Clever reframe.
To make restoring a believer back to christ THE SAME AS ANIMAL SACRIFICE.
What did you think the OT animal sacrifices were for?
Says nothing at all about what you re engineered those verses to be.
It say ONCE DEPARTING, ( HAVING TASTED OF THE THINGS OF GOD) THEN RETURNING TO THE WORLD, OR THE DEVIL, OR SIN.....IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO RENEW THEM.
Doesn't say "renew". It says "repentance". Repentance is a change of mind. By going back to animal sacrifices shows they had no assurance (in their minds) of Christ's once for all sacrifice. Otherwise, they wouldn't have gone back to animal sacrifices.
If you aren't familiar with what actual Greek scholars comment on Heb 6, I suggest you become familiar. Due to extreme pressure on Jewish Christians to return to observing the Law, many were doing so, or thinking about doing so.
IOW THEY MADE A CHOICE.
THEY CHOSE THE DEVIL OR THEIR FORMER LIFE.
No argument.
YOUR ENTIRE DEAL RELIES ON ONE THING ...THAT NOBODY HAS EVER DEPARTED THE FAITH, AND THAT CHOICE IS IMPOSSIBLE.
Uh, that's not what Heb 6 says. Or any other verse.
Jesus Himself taught very clearly that believers CAN depart the faith.
Luke 8:13 - Those on the rocky ground are the ones who receive the word with joy when they hear it, but they have no root.
They believe for a while, but in the time of testing
they fall away.
The "falling away" refers to "believing for a while". Jesus said NOTHING about losing salvation.
QUOTE """
In fact, Heb 6 makes the point that those who have turned back to animal sacrifice WON'T REPENT"""
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
You made that up out if thin air. It just says they departed the faith.and it is impossible to bring them back.
What you seem to miss is that it is "impossible" for them to repent BECAUSE they have turned back to animal sacrifices.
It goes on to measure men by "bearing fruit vs thorn bushes , that are appointed to burning"
I recommend that you read the text better than you have.
7 Land that drinks in the rain often falling on it and that produces a crop useful to those for whom it is farmed receives the blessing of God.
8 But land that produces thorns and thistles is worthless and is in danger of being cursed. In the end it will be burned.[/QUOTE]
You seem to think it is the "land" that will be burned. Do you really think you can burn land?? Of course you can't.
It is the production, or "thorns and thistles" that is worthless and "will be burned".
Hmm. Kinda sounds familiar, don'cha think?
Oh yeah. Paul wrote something like this.
1 Cor 3-
12 If anyone builds on this foundation using gold, silver, costly stones, wood, hay or straw,
13 their work will be shown for what it is, because the Day will bring it to light. It will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test the quality of each person’s work.
14 If what has been built survives, the builder will receive a reward.
15 If it is burned up, the builder will suffer loss but yet will be saved—even though only as one escaping through the flames.
v.12 contrasts divine good vs human good.
v.13 states that the believer's work will be revealed by "fire" or judgment, referring to the Bema, or Judgment Seat of Christ. 2 Cor 5:10.
v.14 refers to divine good production and the believer will receive a reward.
v.15 refers to human good, which is burned up and the believer will "SUFFER LOSS", but then notice what follows immediately:
BUT YET WILL BE SAVED.
There it is, in black and white. The wood, hay and stubble (human good) will be burned up. But the believer YET will be saved.
Same thing as found in Heb 6.
Osas in all cleverness will not make heb 6 go away
I never tried. That would be ridiculous. In fact, I have explained it to prove that it isn't even about losing salvation.
One has to imagine or ASSUME/PRESUME the text is referring to loss of salvation, because there are NO WORDS to that effect.
Since you don't believe in eternal security, why did you give a thumbs up to my post #43?