Calvinist Kitchen...stirring the pot

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.

NOV25

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2019
977
386
63
No, not even close to the truth.

Man is unable and does not possess "ability", John 6:44, John 6:63, salvation is 100% God and 0% mans ability.
It was sort of close 🤷‍♂️ the regenerate man has the ability to trust in God.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
I don't owe anyone an apology for stating the truth in love the way I did, and stand behind every word I said. I will not be intimidated by the mob here anymore that the BLM and leftest mob. I find it suspicious so many are jumping on me over something I called out someone else for. Someone who NEEDS it because they act a fool on here. I was only offering it to you because you jumped into it like you were offended, so I was just offering the baby a pacifier to be honest, but I know you can't appease the irrational with what they want. My mistake. You've slapped my peace offerings away enough now. I have your number and everyone can clearly read it here. Sorry you couldn't get to me, and I hope you have a nice day.
I consider her a hardcore supporter of dcon, that was why she came in.

That is basically how echo chambers work
 
May 19, 2020
3,050
1,275
113
It was sort of close 🤷‍♂️ the regenerate man has the ability to trust in God.

Of course..we don’t know who God is..until we are born again...that is when life becomes alive...in Christ of course....
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
It was sort of close 🤷‍♂️ the regenerate man has the ability to trust in God.
Wondering if at judgement someone's gonna plead "I thought we were playing horseshoes or hand grenades! This ain't fair!!!"

Or my favorite; "LORD, that twernt me, somebody hacked my account!"
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,788
13,546
113
For He says to Moses, "I will have mercy on whomever I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whomever I will have compassion." So then it is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy. For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, "For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I may show My power in you, and that My name may be declared in all the earth." Therefore He has mercy on whom He wills, and whom He wills He hardens. (Romans 9:15-18)

The difficulty as always is looking at a passage with a predetermined bias, however this entire portion has been pointed out so many times by others is God’s right to reject national Israel for salvation after using them to produce the Messiah. It is case specific!!

You cannot take this verse and then change every other portion of scripture to make it all fit.

Tell me do adhere to this as well....

God has chosen, designed, and prepared certain people for destruction. Their only purpose is to serve as objects of God’s wrath, so the elect can better appreciate God’s mercy toward them and His power. Likewise, the elect were chosen, designed, and prepared to serve - but, they were fashioned to serve as objects of His mercy and therefore glorify Him?
Paul understands the context to be, is God unjust? certainly not - He will have mercy on whom He will: therefore it is not by will, by effort, but by God who has mercy. then Paul points at Pharaoh as a specific example of an individual person who illustrates what he is trying to tell us.
Paul understands the obvious objection someone will bring up from this point to be 'how can God judge, since no one can resist His will?'


that objection arises because of a specific, clear interpretation of what Paul is saying. if Paul is not speaking about sovereign election, that objection he anticipates and cuts off with "who are you o man to answer back to God?" makes no sense.



Pharaoh is an individual. remember, too, that Pharaoh's officials were all pleading with him to let the Israelites leave. but it was Pharaoh - an individual - who, being hardened by God, kept them, until all that God had ordained took place - so that all Egypt would know He is the LORD.
if this is, as many say, only about 'national' hardening and mercy, 'corporate generic election' -- it is hard for me to understand why we have specific individual people like Pharaoh, Jacob & Esau used as examples to illustrate it.
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
You will have some great confos with him when you arrive in heaven :)
...xox...
I thought about meeting him and how it would be such a notable thing, humbling, and I love that man deeply. These are true feelings, yet I ponder how much greater will it be seeing our LORD Jesus Christ face to face? Unimaginable, beyond joy, beyond description, I cannot grasp this at all.
 

NOV25

Well-known member
Nov 23, 2019
977
386
63
Lord willing I’ll be heading to Grace community in SoCal this winter, Johnny Mac isn’t getting any younger.
 
May 19, 2020
3,050
1,275
113
I thought about meeting him and how it would be such a notable thing, humbling, and I love that man deeply. These are true feelings, yet I ponder how much greater will it be seeing our LORD Jesus Christ face to face? Unimaginable, beyond joy, beyond description, I cannot grasp this at all.

Me neither...but one day we will meet our Lord!.xx
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
But as many as have received him, the THEM he gave the power

who did he give the power of adoption or new birth too?
He gave it to those "who were born" of God John 1:13, which is why they received and believed.

The above quoted position? Partly God's glory, man-centered, dependent upon man "doing." This is contrary to John 6:63 and to biblical meteorology.

The Biblical position labeled Calvinism? Exegetical, contextual, all God's glory, not dependent upon man "doing", i.e. Soli Deo Gloria!

In other words man didn't receive and believe, and, due to that become born again, they received and believed because they were born from above, regenerated, quickened &c as studying other texts shed light on this fact ; 1 Peter 1:1-2; Ephesians 2:1-3; 2 Thessalonians 2:13; Luke 23:32-43; 1 Peter 1:3; James 1:18.

That said, John 1:13 qualifies the why of the persons receiving in the preceding text as being due to the fact they were first born of God, showing it was, is, and always is to Gods glory alone, that the only reason man believes or receives is due to the work of God in regeneration and rebirth.
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
26,074
13,773
113
You could have added "...of the worst sort". Whenever the true Gospel of God is perverted, it is an extremely serious error. And that is plain from this passage:

GALATIANS 1: THERE IS A CURSE ON ANY OTHER GOSPEL AND ITS PREACHERS
6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.


Calvinists pervert the Gospel and trouble other Christians by making some wonder whether on not they were elected for salvation or damnation. If any gospel teaches that men are elected for damnation, it is indeed from the pit of Hell.

As I have shown in other posts when John Calvin had to actually do an exposition of Bible verses, he had no choice but to present the truth. In spite of that he perverted the Gospel (or perhaps his followers deliberately perverted Calvin's theology).
 
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
You could have added "...of the worst sort". Whenever the true Gospel of God is perrted, it is an extremely serious error. And that is plain from this passage:

GALATIANS 1: THERE IS A CURSE ON ANY OTHER GOSPEL AND ITS PREACHERS
6 I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the grace of Christ unto another gospel:
7 Which is not another; but there be some that trouble you, and would pervert the gospel of Christ.
8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.


Calvinists pervert the Gospel and trouble other Christians by making some wonder whether on not they were elected for salvation or damnation. If any gospel teaches that men are elected for damnation, it is indeed from the pit of Hell.

As I have shown in other posts when John Calvin had to actually do an exposition of Bible verses, he had no choice but to present the truth. In spite of that he perverted the Gospel (or perhaps his followers deliberately perverted Calvin's theology).
Lot's of straw man and emotional pleas up above. Thinking biblical people can see past that, those who live and react emotionally, as many on here do, will buy it up. Rationally biblical people will recognise the above is irrational, has some falsities, and isn't biblically accurate.

First, we believe salvation is only by grace, through faith, and by Christ alone, excluding any works, and that the Gospel is the life, death, burial and resurrection of Christ.

That is not an accursed gospel.

Secondly, any person teaching and knowing that Biblically God passes over some, not showing them mercy, is not adding to the Gospel at all. It is a biblical doctrine that is not part of the Gospel message we preach. It is the meat of the word, however, and a solemn truth to consider in light of the Gospel message.

For the record, the Gospel I preach is the historic Gospel of Orthodox Christianity. It gives all glory to God, salvation being all Him, all due to His glory, that he according to his purpose, counsel and will elects unto salvation whom He wills. Ephesians 1; 1 Thessalonians 1:4, James 1:18; Romans 9:11; 2 Thessalonians 2:13 and many other passages teach this truth.

Therefore, the curse you've attempted to place on us, taking Galatians out of context is misplaced. It isn't on me no matter how badly you wish it to be.

This may "only be a forum", yet you will give an account for your words here in an attempt to sow discord, division, along with a misplaced attempt to place a curse on many who believe the Biblical Gospel. In the past you've called Reformed folks lost, you're doing so yet again. Not that it concerns my souls security, but the shamelessness of your words ought really become shameful to you.

Onto some other biblical truths.

Scripture is clear, only the elect are saved. Election is in the will and purpose of God, pictured in how He chose Israel, Abram and many others throughout Scripture. Note Deuteronomy 7:7; Genesis 12&c.

All true believers are elect, that is, that God chose them based upon nothing they've done, but only by grace. Note 1 Corinthians 1:26-31.

Once you and others lose your scare tactics of wondering if you're elect, or making it into something to be feared because of the false decisional regeneration you preach, and accept Scripture you'd do yourself a huge favor. That you still fail to see that being saved and elect are the same you'll continue your callow tirades of unfamiliarity.

Knowing God chose us is a great comfort, it is completely biblical. Taking more comfort in man, thinking man chose flies not only in the face of Scripture, but God himself whom we should take greater comfort in knowing He chose us.

Lastly God does pass over some, not showing them mercy. The man in Romans 9:19-20 reflects these persons. That is God's right to exercise His justice at will, and I will in now way challenge him on that as the man in the passage above has.

Now, point me to where you posted the following:

As I have shown in other posts when John Calvin had to actually do an exposition of Bible verses, he had no choice but to present the truth. In spite of that he perverted the Gospel (or perhaps his followers deliberately perverted Calvin's theology).
 

Butterflyyy

Well-known member
Oct 31, 2019
1,610
1,318
113
Ugh... as if the pot needs stirring... what's the pint? Calvinists normally don't consider anything contrary said to them anyways.
Read Dave Hunt's book 'What Love Is This?' ...
if you truly want real answers that is.
Otherwise, the Bible tells us not to strive to debate, but to endeavour to live peaceably with all men so far as it is possible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.