Women Equality

It's the same question for Christian men. Your comment reveals your sexism.

That completely changes your parameters. The Church (the Body of Christ) is at odds with modern society. Indeed there is enmity between the two.

Since the title of the thread is *Women Equality* let stick to the subject instead of going off on a tangent.

Christian women must base their beliefs on what is revealed in the Bible.

Not what Betty Frieden had to say.

Based on the parable you quoted, the whole lesson was based on, don’t worry what somebody else is getting. If the female agrees to work for $1 less an hour than her male co worker, or the other way around, you are getting what was offered and accepted. To run to the government and complain of inequality is unbiblical. It’s the owners money and he has the right to spend it as he wants.

I'm pro-woman, therefore I am anti-feminist.

I'm reminded of the show Parks and Rec when I hear of feminism. The star character, a self proclaimed feminist, is quick to put down women that don't fall into her view of what women "should" be. And was known for showing favoritism towards women with lines like "I'm leaving you in charge, because you're a woman". Even to the point of becoming a hypocrite and putting down boys, while elevating girls. All while spouting about "equality". And desperately trying to fit in with the men.
Anytime I see a woman actually promoting feminism this is always what I see. Then there are those who use the title, but don't hold to the modern stance of it. Rather clinging on to this outdated notion of what they believed feminism really was. Without realizing what feminism was is what lead to what it IS. Female domination. Women criticizing men, by acting like men... 🙄

I'm pro-woman, therefore I am anti-feminist.

I'm reminded of the show Parks and Rec when I hear of feminism. The star character, a self proclaimed feminist, is quick to put down women that don't fall into her view of what women "should" be. And was known for showing favoritism towards women with lines like "I'm leaving you in charge, because you're a woman". Even to the point of becoming a hypocrite and putting down boys, while elevating girls. All while spouting about "equality". And desperately trying to fit in with the men.
Anytime I see a woman actually promoting feminism this is always what I see. Then there are those who use the title, but don't hold to the modern stance of it. Rather clinging on to this outdated notion of what they believed feminism really was. Without realizing what feminism was is what lead to what it IS. Female domination. Women criticizing men, by acting like men... 🙄

Ironically , Women lead the sexual revolution! Lol... seriously, I don't know how you all do this constant typing thing. Having a conversation with someone in person was so much more intimate. And I'm not talking about since this pandemic. And I get It. I've got a teenage daughter. With her texting with her friends. When they do have to get on the phone ( I need to speak to there parent's for a sleepover or something.) they never know what to say to one another. This, People not interacting in person or on the cell. You can know how they are feeling by the tone of their voice. Or their attitude. I truly miss those day's and to think that this is gone forever. Well...Kinda S.....

Some of us like writing/typing. Some of us have a lot to share, encourage or hungry to learn. Some are introverts and find this easier than talking in person. Some enjoy helping those who reach out not knowing that one post could stop a suicide or give someone hope. Some find friendships, spouses, or simply companionship when feeling alone. Some love to debate. Some feel called or see the internet as just another evangelism tool as most young people go to the internet to find such answers to questions. Some are here to learn, to grow, to teach, or all 3 hopefully.

So according to why the individual is here, typing may come quite easily.

As for the sexual revolution. I believe it was a group effort by men and women during the 1960s and 70s. The freedom to love or hippie movements consisted of both genders.

It's the same question for Christian men. Your comment reveals your sexism.

For the Christian women do you want 100% equality within your country to that of man? Do you want a slight increase in equality? Or are you happy where you are?

How does your Biblical worldview see the feminist movements of today? Reasonable or radical?

Biblical worldview.... what is that?
The world does what it has always done fumble around in the dark.

I really do not understood your question?

Do you believe critical theory has a play in the modern feminist movements?

What would womens equality within government look like in a Biblical worldview?

spiritually the Bible promotes equality.......we are not to be unequally yoked after all..

There aren't enough options. What about 'less equality' or 'no equality.' How about 'long live the patriarcy.'

Honestly, I'd rather see wives submission to husbands being reflected in law, in buying land, opening bank accounts, and stuff like that. Combined with some stronger marriage law, it might stabilize society, but there would have to be some kind of major sociological and philosophical shifts, probably, for that to work, or a totalitarian regieme taking over with that as part of it's overall legal framework.

What do you disagree with? Please enlighten me.

There is a gender pay gap, if you are talking equal pay for equal work. But in most cases, it is men who are underpaid.

Feminism is a big lie. It's not about equality, or women, its about men and women who push the goals of Communism/Fascism/the NWO. If it wasn't, stay at home mums and mothers wouldn't have been left behind.

I don’t believe critical theory has as much a play in feminism as propaganda does. Critical theory from my understanding has more to do with liberating the oppressed, and bending social construct to make necessary change for functionality. Since I’m not a woman, much less a woman in the 1960s, my perception of their oppression is incomplete. Clearly there was a double standard and their voice was mute. Change was needed in order to increase perceived value, absolutely! However, I feel the champions of feminism just threw gas on a fire. Instead of creating a symbiotic environment where men and women could exist in harmony, they created a competition for supremacy. Competition is a fantastic way to cause dormant skills to surface. The cost for most people of becoming excellent at something is being inadequate at other things. What the women gained in workforce presence they lost on the homefront. Since men are biologically and psychologically more engineered for protecting and providing and women for tending and nurturing, there is imbalance, in the home and the individual. When my daughter told me she wanted to be a firefighter I asked her a question. If our house was on fire and someone had to bust down the door and carry her family out safely, would she prefer a six foot, 220 lb, muscular man show up, or a 5’-4”, 140 lb woman? I didn’t tell her not to but there’s a good chance she would have got the position because of her marks, and gender, not her ability to do the job better.

Your final question isn’t even biblical. Equality isn’t even a consideration. It’s like the family is a unit, and the Church is a unit. We all have our roles, and play our parts. Seeking power that is not given to us, whether male or female is unbiblical.

Your final question isn’t even biblical. Equality isn’t even a consideration. It’s like the family is a unit, and the Church is a unit. We all have our roles, and play our parts. Seeking power that is not given to us, whether male or female is unbiblical