Are All Angels the Same?

And I name on book that is mentioned there are several books mentions, but you toss those like a toy

I have nothing more to say to neither of you two, burn those Roman shoes

Isaiah 6:1 In the year that king Uzziah died I saw also the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up, and his train filled the temple.

2 Above it stood the seraphims: each one had six wings; with twain he covered his face, and with twain he covered his feet, and with twain he did fly.

After God drove Adam and Eve from the garden of Eden, "He stationed cherubs at the east of the garden of Eden, and a fiery sword which turned every way to guard the way to the tree of life" (Genesis 3:24).

Did you want scripture to state, for your personal satisfaction, that seraphim and cherabim are angels? Scripture tells us they exist, what do you say these are?

And your not a man of word for there are books mentioned but you fail in seeing them as something of God.

I'm not a man of Word for believing the Bible is the infallible inspired Word of God? Lol this is proving my point why these gnostic sources are dangerous.

I name on book? I am not understanding your sentences. Toss what like a Toy? Are you saying because scripture referenced different sources automatically makes them inspired? So does all these books below need to be added in our Bible to be fully equipped for what God's will is for us? Or are we already fully equipped?

1. The Book of Wars, Num. 21:14
2. The Book of Jasher, Josh. 10:13
3. The Chronicles of David, 1 Chron. 27:24
4. The Book of the Kings of Israel and Judah, 2 Chron. 27:7; 35:27; 36:8
5. The Book of the Kings of Israel, I Chron. 9:1; 2 Chron. 20:34.
6. The Words of the Kings of Israel, 2 Chron. 33:18.
7. The Decree of David the King of Israel, 2 Chron. 35:4.
8. The Chronicles of Samuel the Seer, 1 Chron. 29:29
9. The Chronicles of Nathan the Prophet, 1 Chron. 29:29
10. The Book of Gad, 1 Chron. 29:29
11. The Book of the Prophet Iddo, 2 Chron. 13:22
12. The Words of Shemaiah the Prophet, 2 Chron. 12:15
13. The Deeds of Uzziah by Isaiah the Prophet, 2 Chron. 26:22; 32:32
14. The Book of Jehu, 2 Chron. 20:34
15. The Record book of Ahasuerus, Esther 2:23; 6:1
16. The Book of Remembrance, Mal. 3:16
17. The Book of Life, Dan. 12:1; Phil. 4:3; Rev. 20:11; 22:19
18. The Book of Judgment, Dan. 7:10; Rev. 20:12
19. The seven-sealed book, Rev. 5:1, 13.
20. An angel's book, Rev. 10:2

The apostle Paul was well-acquainted with Greek philosophy and often quoted Greek writers as he spread the gospel (Acts 17:23–28). New Testament writers also reference Greek philosophical concepts in order to better explain their ideas.

So does that automatically make the Greek philosophers or philosophical ideas inspired and we should completely digest all there teachings also?

Isaiah 6:1 In the year that king Uzziah died I saw also the Lord sitting upon a throne, high and lifted up, and his train filled the temple.

2 Above it stood the seraphims: each one had six wings; with twain he covered his face, and with twain he covered his feet, and with twain he did fly.

After God drove Adam and Eve from the garden of Eden, "He stationed cherubs at the east of the garden of Eden, and a fiery sword which turned every way to guard the way to the tree of life" (Genesis 3:24).

Did you want scripture to state, for your personal satisfaction, that seraphim and cherabim are angels? Scripture tells us they exist, what do you say these are?

I haven't read a word about Jews rejecting this book, new information to me. I did read the minutes of the council of the church the Catholics claim as theirs who today's scholars follow when they repeat the rejection.

The apostle Paul was well-acquainted with Greek philosophy and often quoted Greek writers as he spread the gospel (Acts 17:23–28). New Testament writers also reference Greek philosophical concepts in order to better explain their ideas.

So does that automatically make the Greek philosophers or philosophical ideas inspired and we should completely digest all there teachings also?

It's an interesting proposition really. Men in their councils and over a period of something near to 1500 years elected what scriptures would become the Bible we know today. Then they closed the Canon so as to declare, by their opinions, that God had no thing else to say to humanity. And yet, the 1611 KJV included the Apocryphal books that are often dismissed by Christians today as not of the true Canon. Though the Etheopian Bible does have the Book of Enoch included as well as other books not found in the Canon.
The Book of Enoch Online - Hidden Bible
And if the scriptures being reviewed were all God breathed, what authority then did mere men have to decide what of that which God said through inspiration to those making record of it, was fit to be later bound and distributed and called, God's word?

Why Did The Vatican Remove 14 Books From The Bible in 1684?

I have great trust in the Bible the Word of God. If you believe the Bible isn't accurate, corrupted or missing information then we have a HUGE problem making the Bible a fallible and inaccurate source because as you said men wrote it. Well, then you best throw out the whole thing because how do you know men ain't corrupted it since the beginning?

I believe from scripture it is obvious to see these are part of the Angelic host within Heaven. But what makes one search outside of the Bible to try and learn things about Angels or Heaven if the Bible doesn't include it?

Faith is required and God doesn't provide all the details. Neither does them details about Angels change anything dealing with soul salvation.

Good point Whispered in my opinion I think the Pharisees did the same with the OT long ago.

what assumptions, what nonsense. I believe in everything the Lord says, I question everything man says.

Some people say God wouldn’t have allowed that to happen. I think God allowed Adam and Eve to do what they did, God gives His word and it’s up to people to use it wisely or not use it at all. And today it is quite the task to read between the lines cause man has mangled things for a long time.

Do you believe the Bible is the inspired 100% infallible Word of God?

Because it couldn't be if books are lefts out. The Spirit would be no longer in it and sustaining it. How could you trust the current Bible? What else has been taken or what else is missing?

I believe God is powerful enough to sustain His Word and protect His message.

Yes, God is powerful enough to sustain His word. But as I said, Enoch was indeed apart of the scriptures up to the third century which is supported by Jude quoting Enoch. It may be that God used those men to retrieve the Ethiopic Enoch version, to restore it to the Holy cannon.

Do you believe the Bible is the inspired 100% infallible Word of God?

Because it couldn't be if books are lefts out. The Spirit would be no longer in it and sustaining it. How could you trust the current Bible? What else has been taken or what else is missing?

I believe God is powerful enough to sustain His Word and protect His message.