Why do Dispensationalists teach Separation Theology?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Sep 1, 2019
64
27
18
Wyoming
Here is an interesting, extended defining of the term seed, by Mr. Zodhiates:

zera`: Seed- A masculine noun meaning sowing, seed, descendants, offspring, children, and posterity. The literal use of the word indicates seed of the field (i.e., seed planted in the field). When Israel entered Egypt, Joseph instructed the Israelites to keep four-fifths of the crop as seed to plant in their fields and to serve as food for them (Ge 47:24); the season for planting seed was guaranteed by God to continue without fail (Ge 8:22); and successful, abundant harvests were promised right up until the sowing season if Israel followed the Lord's laws and commands (Lev 26:5). God had created the seed of the field by decreeing that plants and trees would be self-perpetuating, producing their own seed (Ge 1:11) and that the seed-producing plants would be edible (Ge 1:29). Manna, the heavenly food, resembled coriander seed (Ex 16:31). Any seed could be rendered unclean and not usable if a dead body fell on it after the seed had been moistened (Lev 11:38).



The noun is used to describe the seed (i.e., the offspring) of both people and animals. The seed of Judah and Israel would be united and planted peacefully in the land together with animals in a pleasant setting (Je 31:27). Seed can be translated as son (i.e., seed as when God gives Hannah a promise of a son [1Sa 1:11]). The seed of a woman mentioned in Ge 3:15 is her offspring.



The offspring of humans is described many times by this word. Hannah was given additional children to replace Samuel, whom she gave to the Lord's service (1Sa 2:20). The most important seed that the author of Genesis describes is the seed of Abraham, the promised seed, referring to Isaac, Jacob, and his twelve sons (Ge 12:7; 15:3). The author of Genesis uses the word twenty-one times in this setting (Ex 32:13; Dt 1:8). The seed of the royal line of David was crucial to Israel's existence, and the term is used nine times to refer to David's offspring or descendants (2Sa 7:12). In a figurative sense, seed refers to King Zedekiah and perhaps to Israelites of royal lineage, whom Nebuchadnezzar established in Jerusalem (Eze 17:5). Royal lines or seed were found outside Israel, such as in Edom, where Hadad belonged to the royal line (1Ki 11:14), and in Judah, where the wicked Athaliah attempted to destroy the royal seed (2Ki 11:1; 25:25; Je 41:1).



The seed or offspring of a particular nation can be characterized in moral and religious terms as well. Three verses stand out: The seed of Israel was called a holy seed (Ezr 9:2; Isa 6:13); and, in the case of Ezr 9:2, the seed corrupted itself by mixing with the peoples around them. The seed of Israel is a seed of God or a divine seed (Mal 2:15) through its union with God (cf. 2Pe 1:4). An offspring could be described as deceitful and wicked (Ps 37:28; Isa 57:4). It was important in Israel to prove that one's origin or seed stemmed from an Israelite ancestor, for some Israelites and Israelite priests who returned from exile could not show their origin (Ezr 2:59). The word also refers to the seed or posterity of the Messiah (Isa 53:10).
So, what's your point in saying all that? You seem to have fallen short in your conclusion. ;)
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,887
2,112
113
Hello Gentle-Warrior,

I was wondering where you might disagree with the following article:

http://www.middletownbiblechurch.org/reformed/israelaf.htm

"How is the Term Israel Used in the New Testament?"

Used 73x in the NT, … "The term “Israel” is either used of the nation or the people as a whole, or of the believing remnant within. It is never used of the Church in general or of Gentile believers in particular." [quote from conclusion of the article]
 

Melach

Well-known member
Mar 28, 2019
2,055
1,524
113
i believe everyone is dispensational to some level. dispensationalism means rightly dividing the word of truth, separating bible truths to right time periods. all do it

after resurrection > before resurrection.
noah is told to build a boat not you.

all do it.
 

Melach

Well-known member
Mar 28, 2019
2,055
1,524
113
Blindness IN PART (or partial hardening) TOOK place in Israel (old covenant Israel, not Modern non-covenant Israel) ...

It is my understanding that we have this uncanny ability to make the word of God to fit our western culture instead of adjusting ourselves to the culture of the Bible and how Paul applied then.

So, nowhere was Paul the apostle refers to a post 21st Century, modern and political nation, but the Israel of his day, which by the way, was judged by God for all her sins in AD 70.

Personally, I don't see how you can quote this verse without looking at chapter 9:6-8 first and reorganize your thinking as what Paul said Israel was.

By the way, I do not subject myself to Replacement Theology.
i adjust it to bible culture always. and times of gentiles did not end in 1st century. loook in bible when they end. i give hint: jerusalem
 
Sep 1, 2019
64
27
18
Wyoming
i adjust it to bible culture always. and times of gentiles did not end in 1st century. loook in bible when they end. i give hint: jerusalem

The Times of the Gentiles ended when Jerusalem was destroyed and the city was burned to the ground. That's the correct context of the scriptures. There is no reason to believe that modern and false Israel is somehow a continuation of what God judged as Jesus predicted in Mat. 23:34-39.


The Israel of God is and will always be a people of faith that are united to Christ via the Holy Spirit. No one belongs to God without having the Spirit of Christ in them (Ro. 8:9, Heb. 11:6).
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
The Times of the Gentiles ended when Jerusalem was destroyed and the city was burned to the ground. That's the correct context of the scriptures. There is no reason to believe that modern and false Israel is somehow a continuation of what God judged as Jesus predicted in Mat. 23:34-39.

The Israel of God is and will always be a people of faith that are united to Christ via the Holy Spirit. No one belongs to God without having the Spirit of Christ in them (Ro. 8:9, Heb. 11:6).

The mark of the beast,,where do you say it is,,here now,in the past,or here after?
 

Melach

Well-known member
Mar 28, 2019
2,055
1,524
113
The Times of the Gentiles ended when Jerusalem was destroyed and the city was burned to the ground. That's the correct context of the scriptures. There is no reason to believe that modern and false Israel is somehow a continuation of what God judged as Jesus predicted in Mat. 23:34-39.

The Israel of God is and will always be a people of faith that are united to Christ via the Holy Spirit. No one belongs to God without having the Spirit of Christ in them (Ro. 8:9, Heb. 11:6).
ok now i see. if you are calling modern israel false ok but on a secular level who do you want to support? peaceful israel who is striving for peace giving food to gazans who shoot missiles at them or people who say they wont stop until all jews are gone? in other words israel wants peace and has agreed to many concessions, israel's neighbors just want them dead and are evil and racist and have not made any concessions, only want war. if you support israel's racist neighbors that makes you supporting unrighteousness which is evil as well.

if i was in charge of israel i would just take over gaza, but they are more patient than me. enough is enough, their grace period has lasted so long.
 

UnitedWithChrist

Well-known member
Aug 12, 2019
3,739
1,928
113
Which particular prophecies are you referring to?
i believe everyone is dispensational to some level. dispensationalism means rightly dividing the word of truth, separating bible truths to right time periods. all do it

after resurrection > before resurrection.
noah is told to build a boat not you.


all do it.
You are correct from the standpoint that all believe that there are different "dispensations" in one sense. For instance, God was using the Mosaic Covenant as a type of the New Covenant with ancient Israel. He is no longer doing that, and ancient Israel is no longer bound to it.

However, what I am addressing is the position that Israelites and non-Israelites are somehow separate in God's sight and his intentions for them. That is why I use the phrase "separation theology".

I don't like their phrase "replacement theology" and instead insist that "fulfillment theology" is a more honest description of our position.
 

UnitedWithChrist

Well-known member
Aug 12, 2019
3,739
1,928
113
ok now i see. if you are calling modern israel false ok but on a secular level who do you want to support? peaceful israel who is striving for peace giving food to gazans who shoot missiles at them or people who say they wont stop until all jews are gone? in other words israel wants peace and has agreed to many concessions, israel's neighbors just want them dead and are evil and racist and have not made any concessions, only want war. if you support israel's racist neighbors that makes you supporting unrighteousness which is evil as well.

if i was in charge of israel i would just take over gaza, but they are more patient than me. enough is enough, their grace period has lasted so long.
I am not dispensationalist but I still support Israel as an ally, as long as their actions are reasonably moral.

For instance, I think it is reasonably moral for the Israeli government to bulldoze the family homes of terrorists if their families are praising their terrorist offspring or family members as heroes.

I wouldn't prefer Israel over a Christian nation in a similar position, though.

Additionally, we must keep in mind that Christians are persecuted sometimes in Israel, and there are Palestinian Christians who are treated poorly. I imagine they are much safer in Israel, though.
 

Melach

Well-known member
Mar 28, 2019
2,055
1,524
113
Which particular prophecies are you referring to?


You are correct from the standpoint that all believe that there are different "dispensations" in one sense. For instance, God was using the Mosaic Covenant as a type of the New Covenant with ancient Israel. He is no longer doing that, and ancient Israel is no longer bound to it.

However, what I am addressing is the position that Israelites and non-Israelites are somehow separate in God's sight and his intentions for them. That is why I use the phrase "separation theology".

I don't like their phrase "replacement theology" and instead insist that "fulfillment theology" is a more honest description of our position.
in church there is no jew or gentile. but you are still japanese if you become christian.

God promised one people real-estate
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
I
Hello Gentle-Warrior,

I was wondering where you might disagree with the following article:

http://www.middletownbiblechurch.org/reformed/israelaf.htm

"How is the Term Israel Used in the New Testament?"

Used 73x in the NT, … "The term “Israel” is either used of the nation or the people as a whole, or of the believing remnant within. It is never used of the Church in general or of Gentile believers in particular." [quote from conclusion of the article]

Scripture defines the words giving us his spiritual understanding.

All Israel is not born again Israel. A Jew is one inwardly born again of the Spirit of Christ. Not one outwardly pertaining to the flesh (no faith)

The word Israel is used to represent those born again . Previous named after a word that means faithless deceiver. Jacob .(no faith that alone comes from hearing God. . One who walks by sight flesh and blood against flesh and blood .The things seen against the things seen as in out of sight out of mind. .(no faith)

Genesis 32:28And he said, Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel: for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast prevailed.

No power no prevail

The new name he purposed according to the meaning of the world is Israel the one bride of Christ the church. .No longer called Jacob. In Isaiah he promise to renamed his wife called Israel and fulfilled that promise naming her Christian in Acts. A word that means residents of the city of Christ named after her husband Christ .The city coming down on the last day

Having the born again power to prevail. Previously no power. . . no faith. (not little none. . the deceiver, Jacob)

Isaiah 62 For Zion's sake will I not hold my peace, and for Jerusalem's sake I will not rest, until the righteousness thereof go forth as brightness, and the salvation thereof as a lamp that burneth. And the Gentiles shall see thy righteousness, and all kings thy glory: and thou shalt be called by a new name, which the mouth of the Lord shall name. Thou shalt also be a crown of glory in the hand of the Lord, and a royal diadem in the hand of thy God. ...

The promised new final name of His bride the church."Christians"

Acts 11:26 And when he had found him, he brought him unto Antioch. And it came to pass, that a whole year they assembled themselves with the church, and taught much people. And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch.
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
in church there is no jew or gentile. but you are still japanese if you become christian.

God promised one people real-estate
Yes and still remain male even though we are called the bride. The females remain female . We know no person after the flesh.

Yes and fulfilled the one people real-estate. They did not keep up there side of the bargain. It ended with David, God's choice. Not the rebels choice.

Yes one nation was used to represent all of mankind in types as shadows. Using the temporal seen as a form of paganism until the time of reformation.

God gave them over temporally to do that which should not of been demanded. "Give us a king" like that of the surrounding pagan nation that have no faith that alone comes from hearing God.

God giving over the faithless Jew that were used to represent natural unconverted mankind. The time of reformation had come. . . removing the temporal as a parable for the time when there was kings in Israel (a pagan or gentile design) .

We must use the proper prescription when rightly dividing the parables if we are seeking His approval. He has not left us as orphans with interpretation tools..

2 Corinthians 4:18While we look not at the things which are seen, but at the things which are not seen: for the things which are seen are temporal; but the things which are not seen are eternal.

The temporal revealing the unseen eternal that stood in the place of abomination of desolation . When the word it is finished came . . .the veil was rent the graves were opened returning to the restored order of government before their were pagan kings.. rendering it useless as something to feast eyes on a time period long gone. Like antique road show today. Interesting artifacts as shadow of the unseen eternal but no substance. . .. our new incorruptible bodies neither male not female Jew nor gentile ..
 
Sep 1, 2019
64
27
18
Wyoming
The mark of the beast,,where do you say it is,,here now,in the past,or here after?
The mark of the beast is a 2,000-year account of what John saw in his vision. For me to say that Revelation was written for an intergalactic generation of the future, it would only serve to deny the historical context of the scriptures.
 

iamsoandso

Senior Member
Oct 6, 2011
8,048
1,609
113
The mark of the beast is a 2,000-year account of what John saw in his vision. For me to say that Revelation was written for an intergalactic generation of the future, it would only serve to deny the historical context of the scriptures.

Who though received the mark and worshiped the image and were destroyed by the brightness of the Lords coming,, someone did this 2000 years ago in your eschatology?
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,887
2,112
113
Revelation 1:1 -

"The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him [/unto Jesus], to shew unto his servants [see 7:3] things which must come to pass [see 1:19c/4:1] IN QUICKNESS [NOUN]…"


["IN QUICKNESS [NOUN]" not things which would unfold over the course of some 2000 years, nor "immediately/soon [ADVERBS]"... the same "IN QUICKNESS [NOUN]" told of in Lk18:8 ("AVENGE in quickness," not happening NOW) and Romans 16:20 (also not taking place in the NOW, but WILL...in the future, specific, limited time-period being spoken of [/prophesied of] in these CONTEXTS ;) )--recall how "prophecy" works...]
 

Sipsey

Well-known member
Sep 27, 2018
1,476
690
113
So, what's your point in saying all that? You seem to have fallen short in your conclusion. ;)
This was a simple relay of information concerning the definition & use of the term “seed,” in Scripture. If you think my conclusion is somehow “short,” then maybe you missed the purpose of my post; to inform.
 
Sep 1, 2019
64
27
18
Wyoming
This was a simple relay of information concerning the definition & use of the term “seed,” in Scripture. If you think my conclusion is somehow “short,” then maybe you missed the purpose of my post; to inform.
I was waiting for you to mention that Jesus is the seed of Abraham while we are an expression and a result of God'sd seed in us.
 
Nov 23, 2013
13,684
1,212
113
i believe everyone is dispensational to some level. dispensationalism means rightly dividing the word of truth, separating bible truths to right time periods. all do it

after resurrection > before resurrection.
noah is told to build a boat not you.


all do it.
Or rightly dividing means dividing between earthly shadows and the heavenly fulfillment - Flesh descendants of Israel and spiritual descendants of Israel..... this is where the whole dispensational heresy comes from. They can't rightly divide between the two.