Then its not eternal, it is conditional.
Reaping means reaping rewards.. Eternal life is not a reward, it is a gift. Do you understand the diffference?
This is why you all end up in the error you are in.Instead of accepting the scriptures for what they say you end up inventing your own doctrine.The passage in question says:
Galatians 6:
7Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.
8For he that soweth to his
flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the
Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting.
9And let us not be weary in well doing: for in due season we shall reap,
if we faint not.
You claim, "
Reaping means reaping rewards". Why distort the passage?Why add to the word of God?It says, "
reap life everlasting", not rewards as you claim. What is life everlasting?
life:
Strong
zōē
dzo-ay'
From G2198; life (literally or figuratively):
Thayer Definition:
1) life
1a) the state of one who is possessed of vitality or is animate
1b) every living soul
2) life
2a) of the absolute fulness of life, both essential and ethical, which belongs to God, and through him both to the hypostatic “logos” and to Christ in whom the “logos” put on human nature
2b) life real and genuine, a life active and vigorous, devoted to God, blessed, in the portion even in this world of those who put their trust in Christ, but after the resurrection to be consummated by new accessions (among them a more perfect body), and to last for ever.
everlasting:
Strong
aiōnios
ahee-o'-nee-os
From G165; perpetual (also used of past time, or past and future as well):
Thayer Definition:
1) without beginning and end, that which always has been and always will be
2) without beginning
3) without end, never to cease, everlasting
That is eternal life and contrary to your opinion it is reaped.
Um no. People followed jesus, yet even in John 6, Jesus knew who believed and who did not believe, The people who departed departed because they lacked faith. Many people believe in jesus, bit they do not have faith in jesus
Do you understand the difference?
Here you enter the realm of superior faith,which saves,of which you boast.LOL Your attempt to belitle the faith of some is understandable in your quest to support your doctrine.The fact is,any initial belief in Jesus,even like that of the thief on the cross,is saving faith.The actions which follow will determine if that faith is maintained.This is unlike the thief on the cross who died at that point and more like the woman caught in adultery,who continued in life.Do you understand the difference?It is as Paul says:
Romans 6:
1What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
2God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?
Also as the scripture said:
Hebrews 3:
12Take heed,
brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of UNBELIEF, in
departing from the living God.
The persons being warned here are brethren,hence they have believed and they are saved.They could depart and hence they were with God and they are saved.The reason for departing was a breakdown or loss of faith.What would be the evidence of this?It would be the same as it was for those being used as the example.(Hebrews 3:16-19)
Hebrews 3:
13But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day;
lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin.
14For we are made partakers of Christ,
if we hold the beginning of our confidence stedfast unto the end;
Sin would be the evidence of that breakdown or loss of faith.Hence it is not a case of superior faith as you and others imply by your statements but a case of enduring faith as the scriptures teach.
John also said he who sins has never seen or known. God, whoever is born of God can not sin.
People who are saved BY their NEW nature doeth righteousness.
People who are not saved BY their NATURE sins.
Again, do you know the difference?
Remember you had written:
"
Remember, God said your works are as filthy bloody rags, if that is what you think you can offer God and expect him to save you, Your mistaken my friend."
Hence my response,which you have ignored with your response above.So I ask again:
Do you understand the context in which this was said?Do you understand the change in context which the advent of Jesus brought?As I wrote before:
"Without the sacrifice of Christ that is very true but God also said:
I John 3:
7Little children, let no man deceive you:
he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous.
John is writing to those who are sons of God.(I John 3:1-5)Do you understand why the sacrifice of Christ makes a difference?Do you understand why the person outside of Christ will have no hope regardless of how perfect he has been,but that this is not so for those in Christ as the scripture above shows?"
Answering these questions by using the scriptures and not your opinion will lead you to the truth.