Eternal Security/OSAS is Bad Doctrine

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Cee

Senior Member
May 14, 2010
2,169
473
83
Thanks.
What do you make of this?
In what spiritual state are those who have fallen away?

Hebrews 6:4-6
It is impossible for those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit, 5 who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the coming age 6 and who have fallen away, to be brought back to repentance. To their loss they are crucifying the Son of God all over again and subjecting him to public disgrace.
Well, before I answer that, let me agree with you the most literal interpretation would seem to say that if we sin, we can't be forgiven. But I don't believe that. Do you? I don't think that's the proper interpretation. Especially since so much of NT Scripture is written to believers who are sinning to remind them they are free.
 

Sketch

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2018
1,278
300
83
Yep..he does disagree with your view and aligns perfectly with my view.......

Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by FAITH without the deeds/works of the law.
James 2:14
What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them?
 

Sketch

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2018
1,278
300
83
Well, before I answer that, let me agree with you the most literal interpretation would seem to say that if we sin, we can't be forgiven. But I don't believe that. Do you? I don't think that's the proper interpretation. Especially since so much of NT Scripture is written to believers who are sinning to remind them they are free.
I would agree that it does not say/mean that. What does it mean then?
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,726
13,522
113
Well, before I answer that, let me agree with you the most literal interpretation would seem to say that if we sin, we can't be forgiven. But I don't believe that. Do you? I don't think that's the proper interpretation. Especially since so much of NT Scripture is written to believers who are sinning to remind them they are free.
if the historical context is indeed as i mentioned in the previous post, then what we are seeing being addressed in ch. 6 may be the idea of continuing in the law, making sacrifices for guilt and sin, which would be to discard & disbelieve the grace our Lord demonstrated to us, putting Him to open shame. it would be to 'fall away' from the sure hope of our salvation and forgiveness of sin through His perfect work, exchanging it for the blood of bulls and goats as it were, which would be to effectively declare that Christ must be crucified again for sin, because His work was ineffective/insufficient.
 

Sketch

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2018
1,278
300
83
if the historical context is indeed as i mentioned in the previous post, then what we are seeing being addressed in ch. 6 may be the idea of continuing in the law, making sacrifices for guilt and sin, which would be to discard & disbelieve the grace our Lord demonstrated to us, putting Him to open shame. it would be to 'fall away' from the sure hope of our salvation and forgiveness of sin through His perfect work, exchanging it for the blood of bulls and goats as it were, which would be to effectively declare that Christ must be crucified again for sin, because His work was ineffective/insufficient.
It clearly has nothing to do with the law.

Hebrews 6:4-6
It is impossible for those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit, 5 who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the coming age 6 and who have fallen away, to be brought back to repentance. To their loss they are crucifying the Son of God all over again and subjecting him to public disgrace.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,726
13,522
113
It clearly has nothing to do with the law.
oh? this is the book in which it is written, 'the priesthood having been changed, there is of necessity a change in the law' -- chapter 7 actually has quite a bit to do with the law.

why does the author write this to the recipients? isn't he perhaps explicitly saying so because the people he's writing to didn't think this is the case? there are no chapter nor verse distinctions in the manuscripts. the arguments being made in chapter 6 flow directly into the conclusions and continuing rhetoric of chapter 7, and follow logically from what has just been said in chapter 5: which is, that Christ is our priest. why are we talking about priesthood and its legal justification & purposes in ch.5 and ch. 7 yet ch.6 has absolutely nothing to do with either subject?
 

GodsGrace101

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2018
2,225
517
113
AND context dictates the following....

ROMANS speaks to being justified before GOD
James speaks to a man's claim of faith being justified before MEN by our works

The contrast in JAMES is is compared to a mere belief in GOD and was written to the JEWISH STRANGERS scattered abroad....even today the JEWS BELIEVE IN GOD <--as the demons do and tremble (James), yet most have no SAVING FAITH......

JAMES does not teach a faith/works blend salvation...........regardless of any and all that attempt to make that leap....it is not there!
James 1:1-4


1James, a bond-servant of God and of the Lord Jesus Christ,
To the twelve tribes who are dispersed abroad: Greetings.
2Consider it all joy, my brethren, when you encounter various trials,
3knowing that the testing of your faith produces endurance.
4And let endurance have its perfect result, so that you may be perfect and complete, lacking in nothing.


D, James is speaking to his brethren in Christ, even though they are dispersed abroad. Some theologians believe this phrase to mean the ENTIRETY of the Jewish nation, I myself like the former better.

He is telling his Jewish brethren in Christ that they should not only be HEARERS of the word, but DOERS of the word. This totally destroys your idea that he is speaking for man's purpose and not for God's purpose.
James 1:22

I like James 2:5 also

5Listen, my beloved brethren: did not God choose the poor of this world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom which He promised to those who love Him?

Here James plainly tells his BRETHREN that they are rich in FAITH.
Then James goes into his works teaching.
Faith without works is dead.


Why? Because those who love Jesus will do what He commanded.

And what did Jesus command? More than can be listed here...

Worship the Lord your God and SERVE Him only Luke 4:8
Do the will of Him who sent me and accomplish His work John 4:34
Reap when the fields are ready for harvest John 4:36
Come and follow Me Mark 1:7
Preach Mark 1:18
Show mercy Mathew 5:7
Let your light shine before men Mathew 5:16
Go the extra mile Mathew 5:41
Give to everyone who asks you of something Luke 6:30
Love your enemies Mathew 5:44
Give to the needy Mathew 6:2,3,4
Do what I say Mathew 7:21


I have plenty more...the list can be found online.
source: http://cvi2.org/paul-timothy/pages/jesus/docs/300_commands_of_jesus.html

Jesus spoke about heaven and hell. He came here to teach us how to get to heaven...not how to get rewards, so I'm hoping you don't go there.

He came to teach salvation --- getting to heaven.,
He came to teach the Kingdom of God ----
 

Sketch

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2018
1,278
300
83
oh? this is the book in which it is written, 'the priesthood having been changed, there is of necessity a change in the law' -- chapter 7 actually has quite a bit to do with the law.

why does the author write this to the recipients? isn't he perhaps explicitly saying so because the people he's writing to didn't think this is the case? there are no chapter nor verse distinctions in the manuscripts. the arguments being made in chapter 6 flow directly into the conclusions and continuing rhetoric of chapter 7, and follow logically from what has just been said in chapter 5: which is, that Christ is our priest. why are we talking about priesthood and its legal justification & purposes in ch.5 and ch. 7 yet ch.6 has absolutely nothing to do with either subject?
What does Hebrews chapter eleven have to do with the law?
Not EVERYTHING in Hebrews is about the law.
 

posthuman

Senior Member
Jul 31, 2013
37,726
13,522
113
What does Hebrews chapter eleven have to do with the law?
Not EVERYTHING in Hebrews is about the law.
what i'm saying is ask yourself the question, why is this passage found exactly where it's found, in the midst of a discussion that obviously has a lot to do with a change in priesthood and the setting aside of the former commandment?
 

preacher4truth

Senior Member
Dec 28, 2016
9,171
2,718
113
That proves my point. And that you were lying to me. What's next?
Your point hasn't been proven. And now you're accusing of lying? Wow, Ralph~, what's with your false accusations? Show me where I lied...
 

Sketch

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2018
1,278
300
83
what i'm saying is ask yourself the question, why is this passage found exactly where it's found, in the midst of a discussion that obviously has a lot to do with a change in priesthood and the setting aside of the former commandment?
Where is the love chapter located? Between I Corinthians chapters twelve and fourteen. Does that make sense? (nope)
Same thing happening here. The faith chapter is in Hebrews eleven. What does that have to do with the law?
 

Sketch

Well-known member
Nov 1, 2018
1,278
300
83
Your point hasn't been proven. And now you're accusing of lying? Wow, Ralph~, what's with your false accusations? Show me where I lied...
I'm new here. I have never been here before. You have been treating me like crap ever since I arrived. What is wrong with you?
And yes, you lied to me. Your behavior is indeed unchristian.
 

GodsGrace101

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2018
2,225
517
113
i have heard some say that Hebrews was written to believers who had fled Jerusalem when the temple was destroyed, who were considering whether that they should go back, and try to rebuild, even to restart the sacrifices, continuing in the law of Moses as they had before the advent of Christ. it actually makes a certain sense, what the content of the epistle is, if this is is indeed the context. it's not something i feel qualified to come to a conclusion about tho
This is exactly what Hebrews 6 is speaking of.
This is why it says that IF the Jews returned to the sacrificial system there would be no more recourse for them since they would be trampling on the sacrifice of Jesus.

They were so used to the old system that they began to worry that they might be making a mistake by following this new idea of trusting in Jesus.
 

GodsGrace101

Well-known member
Sep 14, 2018
2,225
517
113
I'm new here. I have never been here before. You have been treating me like crap ever since I arrived. What is wrong with you?
And yes, you lied to me. Your behavior is indeed unchristian.
It's not you, it's him.
He seems to treat everybody like that.
It's unfortunate because Jesus said we're to love one another.