Stop it with the superior attitude already.Seriously? You really need to ask that question? Have you read much about God's people, his "sheep" in Scripture?
Your claim was ridiculous.
Stop it with the superior attitude already.Seriously? You really need to ask that question? Have you read much about God's people, his "sheep" in Scripture?
That's ridiculous.
Why would Jewish Christians, that's Christians, need to be convinced why Jesus was a much better way of salvation?
Doesn't the fact that they were Christians already answer that question? Seems so.
My claim is spot on, your tactic was lame. Using the defense (tactic really) that you used is to show oneself unacquainted with Scripture, Ralph~.Stop it with the superior attitude already.
Your claim was ridiculous.
So does that mean you're a gnostic?Here are what some WHO KNEW THE APOSTLES taught about eternal security...a concept that DID NOT exist....FranC, for the mere fact you threw in the "please no Gnostics" derogation...I'll pass.
What's with the Ralph thing? Another insult I suppose.My claim is spot on, your tactic was lame. Using the defense (tactic really) that you used is to show oneself unacquainted with Scripture, Ralph~.
So does that mean you're a gnostic?
This is what you posted in the reply in post no. 345:Typical FranC false accusations.
I'm sure that some reading along will understand the ECF that I posted,,,all of whom were taught by the Apostles themselves that eternal security is not found anywhere in the N.T.You have a real hard time controlling your tongue, don't you, FranC? James 1:26. And full of slander as well. Wonder what such behavior means?
As for your quotes, those have to do with not persevering in the faith and showing ones self to not be truly converted. But cut and paste away, FranC.
Ummm. What did my tongue say that you don't care for?You have a real hard time controlling your tongue, don't you, FranC? James 1:26. And full of slander as well. Wonder what such behavior means?
As for your quotes, those have to do with not persevering in the faith and showing ones self to not be truly converted. But cut and paste away, FranC.
After your slander, Gnostic accusations FranC? I'll pass on answering you. Your tongue gives you away.This is what you posted in the reply in post no. 345:
I highly doubt you'd listen, you've already convinced yourself your interpretations are correct and that salvation is up to man in either losing it, maintaining it, or gaining it.
Since you do not agree that it's up to man to lose, maintan, or gain salvation...
it must surely mean that you believe GOD does it ALL.
Did I misunderstand you?
Do you agree instead that MAN is responsible for losing, maintaining, or gaining salvation?
That would be nice to hear.
Sounds like you don't agree with Jesus.No one is saved because they merely believe.
We are aved because we have faith
If temptation causes us to fall. We had no faith..
I think jesus knows the difference between saving faith and mere belief.
Amen,
Again, it may be hard for us to understand, but to the jew at the time who had the law as their primary belief system, it was not hard at all.
The sacrifice had to be continually offered for those who had sinned (fallen away)
If one could fall away (if it were possible) and Jesus is the only sacrifice which mattered (as the church proclaimed) then if one fell away, Jesus himself would have to be sacrificed in order to bring back the one whose sin his first sacrifice did not cover. Thus saying one could fall away (which the jews were taught from birth concerning the law) would put christ to open shame, it declaires his sacrifice was not enough.
I DO apologize.After your slander, Gnostic accusations FranC? I'll pass on answering you. Your tongue gives you away.
We are in constant need to balance one scripture against another.
The Apostle Paul says it is by grace we are saved through faith, not by works.
James say faith without works is dead. (one example)
Thanks.He's correct. Hebrews is written to exhort believers to stay under the redemption of Christ. They were being persecuted by the Jews. Hebrews is written extensively about the sufficiency found only in Christ. And the author shows systematically why Christ is the fulfillment of the old system. Thus if you look for "another sacrifice" there remains no forgiveness for sins. The destruction of the temple in 70 AD was the fulfillment of this reality. There no longer remains a temple to sacrifice at because Christ alone is the Truth, Way and Life. No other way to God. He is our High Priest. And the Lamb that every other sacrifice pointed towards.
Man, it just seems so Ralphy~ in this thread...
James seems to disagree.AND context dictates the following....
ROMANS speaks to being justified before GOD
James speaks to a man's claim of faith being justified before MEN by our works
The contrast in JAMES is is compared to a mere belief in GOD and was written to the JEWISH STRANGERS scattered abroad....even today the JEWS BELIEVE IN GOD <--as the demons do and tremble (James), yet most have no SAVING FAITH......
JAMES does not teach a faith/works blend salvation...........regardless of any and all that attempt to make that leap....it is not there!
James seems to disagree.
James 2:18
But someone will say, “You have faith; I have deeds.”
Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by my deeds.
I disagree with your view.
Hebrews was written to distinguish to the jewish christians why Jesus is a much better was of salvation.
It is written to Hebrew christians concerning issues they were suffering through in the day it was written.
Taking it any other way causes us to misinterpret the book.