Seems Revalations and Book of Enoc are seldom/never preached about today.

Thanks. I will go through these sources and check them out. Thanks again

LOL! there are lots here who can help you with that one . . .

How about you respond to the criticism instead of making unwarranted assumptions about me.

Here is the text from Ratzinger's book - it says nothing about Rome rewriting the text of Matt 28, what it does say is the text of the Creed came out of Rome based on the Matt 28 text:

Thanks for that. Seems like an out-of-context quotation by the oneness individual to support his claims. Sad.

It is my belief and conviction, that even if all you have posted, and indeed all these "August" scholars, labors, not being in vainful pursuits?
Have exposed, for lack of a better term (being as non-educated in (ahem) the "Higher Schools of Biblical Learning"), or put forth the "uncovering" of a "mystery", of the Wisdom of God!

Inasmuch, as God HAS, (whether all this be true, or not), had the foresight, (knowing the end from the beginning), as well as the Power, and AUTHORITY, in the "Carrying ON", if nothing else? The NAME of Jesus Christ of Nazareth. Call it "Providence?" Call it "Preservation of the Saints?" (as an appeasement of sorts to the enemies of God), or whatever other "handle", one may wish to attach to it, in the, or until, "within the council of His GOOD Will", the Proper TIME, or, that His "Servants Prophecies", could be, or would be fulfilled!

One does not have to endeavor very far at all into History, in the finding out that Christians, from now, back to the "very beginnings of the Church", and yea, even Christ Himself, who really had not that many followers of His TRUER "Teachings", outside of the "free food" and "free healthcare." And, when "tribulation/s" came? "POOF!!"....."GONE!!"....In LESS then 60 seconds!

In "short?" This "diddy" you posted, if true? And, I have little doubt as to it being so, explains, (a) WHAT, may, or have may not have, been done! As I also have little doubt there were, or are now, yet "things/changes" hithertofore, not been (how can I say) revealed?

And, if it gives cause for "sheeps, to think?" It can't be all bad, now can it?

But, so oft times, I'll just say this: sometimes? a man's "ego", causes him in the "entertaining of strange (while not the "judging of") bedfellows!"

Praying you are not one of them!

I got "hijacked!"

In regards to the OP, I rather like the book of Enoch. As Enoch not only names names of those in the "attempted overthrow", He also names names, of some of the Holy Angels, aka "archangels", and some hints of "their" placings, in "God's Government!" As in, "entertaining Angels unawares", that Paul spoke of. Of which, in "God's Holy Vetting Process?" Are "there", to help the believer grow Spiritually!

I do.........I teach a lot about the end...every Sunday, 1.5 to 2 hours straight.....

If you take the time to read the examples I gave you will notice there are THREE other Catholic sources confirming the same thing. All of them claim Matthew 28:19 was changed by 2nd/3rd century to the trinity. But if we look at history, it was the Catholic monks who spent day after day writing down verse after verse copying the Bible. This Matthew 28:19 is no different than the story of Lazarus (beggar) and the rich man. In the Catholic Encyclopedia like Matthew 28:19, there is a claim that Christ NEVER told the story of Lazarus and the rich man in a burning hell. After all, the Hebrew/Jews never believed in a literal burning hell. Yahweh never mentioned such a thing to Moses or to the prophets. So clearly, giving Christ credit for this story is an outright lie. And this story of Lazarus/rich man in a burning is nowhere else within the Gospels.

Obviously, you don't want to know the truth concerning the Catholics and changing scripture. If you read the actual Hebrew Old Testament (Torah), you will see changes in the KJV that do not match. So it's rather clear the 2nd/3rd century Catholics added/changed scripture throughout the entire Bible to fit their agenda.

Sometimes getting a clue is having to face the facts you wished never existed!!

Why do I need to make false claims when the Catholics admit within their history to changing scripture?

I will copy/paste the message I left for the individual who you quoted to give the answer you gave ^


If you take the time to read the examples I gave you will notice there are THREE other Catholic sources confirming the same thing. All of them claim Matthew 28:19 was changed by 2nd/3rd century to the trinity. But if we look at history, it was the Catholic monks who spent day after day writing down verse after verse copying the Bible. This Matthew 28:19 is no different than the story of Lazarus (beggar) and the rich man. In the Catholic Encyclopedia like Matthew 28:19, there is a claim that Christ NEVER told the story of Lazarus and the rich man in a burning hell. After all, the Hebrew/Jews never believed in a literal burning hell. Yahweh never mentioned such a thing to Moses or to the prophets. So clearly, giving Christ credit for this story is an outright lie. And this story of Lazarus/rich man in a burning is nowhere else within the Gospels.

Obviously, you don't want to know the truth concerning the Catholics and changing scripture. If you read the actual Hebrew Old Testament (Torah), you will see changes in the KJV that do not match. So it's rather clear the 2nd/3rd century Catholics added/changed scripture throughout the entire Bible to fit their agenda.

Sometimes getting a clue is having to face the facts you wished never existed!!

And how many years? lol

There is no logic in you response to my post about the canon.

You have just one agenda ("Trinity is false") and you are putting it everywhere without a proper context.

Started with devotionals and witnessing in 1990, devotionals, witnessing and teaching since 1992 and full bore teaching, preaching, witnessing since 95...3 times a week

You are proving what I said earlier, if Matthew 28:19 is corrupted, WHAT ELSE IS? Yea, hath God saith? Now you are admitting that catholis supposedly added/changed scripture throughout the ENTIRE Bible to fit their agenda.
So now we dont know what verses are true. We need a special guru like you to tell us what is and what isnt.

This is how cults start. Beware.

I've been studying the history of preaching and following the teaching of Alistair begg of Truth for life.
Bringing in other books or rather sprucing up a sermon to the point of entertaining it's hearers is exactly what the enemy wants you to do.
We have 3 or more generations that are far from God due to the fact that their parents have not been the best examples.
Lost generations...side tracked and entertained by the cares of this world.
Going to church used to be a family tradition ( this is what we do) now it's come to a matter of choice.
Many parents have said I'll let my child make up his own mind. What😨.
Our worship has become a entertaining enterprises. A more cowbell thing. Saints stop pointing the finger at this church or that.
Jesus left us to over see this place in his absence. Yes he is the head but if the body has made it's mind up on it's broke let's move on then what use is the head?
Of course we're being attacked.....thats suppose to happen....we are not to adjust to make things comfortable. God sakes were talking about life or death here.
It's not about the numbers it's about the relationship with our heavenly father. He will do the work if we remain faithful.
The letters to the 7 churches should be a warning to us all. Guess what???? They don't exsist no more. They were not taken over they were removed. Ended. Get serious saints, if you car or truck or house is in need of repair do you walk away from it or do ya find the problem and fix it? Better yet find some one to fix it if you are unable.
Problem is we look at ourselves as lay people if we're not a pastor, teacher elder, no such thing. We are all Gods people.

Alistair Begg truth for life ministry....the pastors study. Check it out.

The church usually uses scripture. And not the private interpretation of some person called Enoch as a guess.

The scriptures refer to the prophecies of Enoch, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints.

If we call the saying below as a book . It is a very short book (47 words)

Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints,To execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him.

To prophecy is simply to declare the will of God. But it does not tell us which prophecy. Enoch could of used the books of the law as the words God gave to Moses as a reminder.

It does mean we are given a blank piece of paper and just fill in what a person might think Enoch said if he did say more than what scripture accredits to him.

Deuteronomy 33:1-3 King James Version (KJV) And this is the blessing, wherewith Moses the man of God blessed the children of Israel before his death.And he said, The Lord came from Sinai, and rose up from Seir unto them; he shined forth from mount Paran, and he came with ten thousands of saints: from his right hand went a fiery law for them. Yea, he loved the people; all his saints are in thy hand: and they sat down at thy feet; every one shall receive of thy words.

Catholicism is founded on necromancy .It makes the word of God without effect. There is a animated movie called "Coco" from the help of Disney that describes that foundation of necromancy that a Catholic must follow when following the legion (3500 and rising) workers with familiar spirits that must be called "patron saints".

I checked one of your supposed sources you gleaned off the internet and established it was taken out of context and totally misapplied - I've no doubt if I checked the other "sauces" I'd find a similar misrepresentation.

Poor research on your part.

Here's what Strong's Concordance says of the H6944 word ['holy'] in Deuteronomy 33:2 -

[quote taken from Bible Hub]

"Strong's Exhaustive Concordance

consecrated thing, dedicated thing, hallowed thing, holiness, most holy day, portion, thing, saint,

From qadash; a sacred place or thing; rarely abstract, sanctity -- consecrated (thing), dedicated (thing), hallowed (thing), holiness, (X most) holy (X day, portion, thing), saint, sanctuary.'

[end quoting]