I agree.
Even the Justices on SCOTUS noticed that Phillips was inconsistent in arguing his religious convictions in his refusal of the wedding cake special design for two gay men and long time customers. It's in the first part of the entire case here.
The first part of this opening by Phillips attorney should have had the decision rule against Phillips.
Phillips speech was completed when he had completed that cake with rainbow design that was on public display. However, after refusing to make a special designed wedding cake for the gay men Phillips, who knew they were committing two sins already and that clearly did not make him object to serving or supplying them, gifted the men that premade cake, a rainbow layered cake, for what Phillips knew was a gay wedding.
Phillips is a bigot. He didn't win religious freedom for Christians in this case. He gained victory as a bigot who used the faith of Christ as his disguise. He's a shame. Not a hero.
Anyone who takes time to opine on gays seeking a wedding cake and because there is no such thing as a gay wedding cake, should take time to listen to this case.
Even Phillips attorney struggles to make Phillips standpoint make legal sense for the court. She sounds really at a loss. But boy was she paid!
Remember too that state courts in Phillips own home state ruled against him. Rightly so.