The advances in camersa and photography equipment over the last couple of decades has been nothing less than AMAZING!!!!!!!!!!
Cameras can now be placed on sattellites and sent into space, capture clear pictures of the deepest stars/galaxies in space or even the license plate number on your car as you drive along. And everbody has an advanced camera today. What's puzzling is that nobody can seem to capture a really clear/undisputable photo of the aliens or their craft.
These advances in photography lead me to believe that the UFOs/ETs are so advanced that they've created a 'Star Trek Like' cloaking device which makes it impossible to capture a clear picture of them, despite the miracles of today's cameras.
PS, I suspect that Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster have the same type 'cloaking device' that prevents their picture from being taken. A little like Dracula and the mirror effect. JMOH
Hey Arthur you seem genuine in your response so I will try to explain this fuzzy camera phenomenon that everyone says trollingly without understanding technological details.
The advances in cameras in the last 20 years as you said have been phenomenal. Think of the days of Polaroids. With a Polaroid camera when you were sitting still you could take amazing pictures for the standard back then but as you know everything far away more than a few feet was very blurry. Because that was the lens capacity.
With a common iPhone nowadays you could take extreme high resolution details when you’re taking stationary photos. But for far away objects like clouds or trees in the far background … that’s still blurry. That’s because the camera is still not good enough.
Now if we take these two basic comparisons and add Movements into the mix, then the blurry effect is maximized 10 fold.
‘As your driving with your car, try opening your passenger window and take a picture while driving like 30mph. You will see nothing but a blurr. That’s because movement is the factor here and you need a very specialized high speed camera to give you some sort of clear picture. A camera that takes 1000 frames per second. An average phone camera takes 30 frames per second.
Now taking this up one more level, into the cameras of jets flying at the speed of sound (almost) where they took the videos of those flying objects that the congress is now interested. They are commonly referred to as Tic Tacs.
The cameras as still so good that even with the insane amount of speed of a flying jet and the twists and turns in mid-air causing massive G forces for pilots …. The camera is still able to record a somewhat clear but a little blurry image.
So this isn’t some sort of cloaking device but how the cameras work in relation to speed distance and depth.
I hope this gives you some understanding in this blurry issue.