I do understand what you're saying. But seeing as you seem to be especially interested in this, I'd like to ask you again, what would the punishment be for fathers?
I already gave an example from my own life if my own birth father had wanted to abort me.
I'm also asking because I went to a Lutheran school -- and, real-life story -- a couple, as in, both the girl AND the guy -- were caught skipping school after getting an abortion. This was reported to the entire student body, and since it was their senior year, they were not allowed to walk at graduation. They also had to write a letter apologizing to everyone at the school.
What do you believe their punishment should have been for each of them, since obviously both were compliant with the murder?
I've also worked with at least 2 young women who had abortions as well -- one who was very open about it because she nearly, and the other was weeping loudly in the restroom and I asked her what was wrong. Both had made this decision in agreement with the fathers.
If these women were to be punished for murder, the fathers should get the same punishments, no?
What would those be?
Also to Susanna, Tall_Timbers, Magenta, daisyseesthesun and Mem,
I introduced this topic because I hope to help "open the eyes of the blind" (IS 42:7) by sharing my own history. I knew very little about fetal development when I was in my twenties, and "pro-choice" sounded like a good option so I was a "birthist", but when I was confronted by pictures of a seven-month-old fetus in the womb and a seven-month-old premature but viable baby outside the womb, I realized that geographical location is not a valid basis for defining personhood because
there is no qualitative change that occurs at birth, merely a difference in the mode of breathing and feeding.
Thus, I was led to consider
the crucial question:
when does a developing fetus become a human person with the God-given right to civil life so that to kill it is murder and warrants punishment?
The conceptionist viewpoint is certainly right that a qualitative change occurs when the chromosomes in the egg and sperm are united, and learning about fetal development should enable birthists to realize that
the advent of personhood definitely occurs by the seventh month or viability, when a premature baby is frequently able to survive.
Are there any changes between conception and viability that might reasonably/logically be viewed as indicative of the beginning of personality? There is one possibility: the counterpart of the basis doctors use for determining when an adult person no longer is alive. This basis is
brain death or the absence of certain brain wave activity detected by an electroencephalo-gram (EEG). We might call this stage “
sentience”, referring to the level of brain activity which indicates the fetus has
brain life and is therefore a person, who should be granted the civil right to life. If our best definition of sentient death is the cessation of these brain waves, then
it is logical and consistent to view sentient life as beginning at least when these brain waves are detectable. Thus, I think every open-minded and truth-seeking person should agree that the fetus becomes sentient and a legal person at least by that stage of development.
This is only a partial solution, but it is a big step in the right direction toward no abortion except in order to save the life of the mother. It recognizes that
a gray area still exists from conception until sentience, so people may still reasonably disagree about the status of the fetus during this period, which may change as science improves. This view permits most forms of birth control. Implementing
this solution requires educating every post-pubescent person about fetal development until society develops a new consensus that when a fetus becomes sentient, abortion is a type of murder and should be punished appropriately.
Love in Christ, GWH