i dont think so, I think Jesus really wanted equality amongst brethren, which is why, the city of new Jerusalem, the most holy of holies, lies foursquare and all the measurements of the holy city are equal. Its also why, he told the parable of the workers, everyone was paid the same, even if some had worked more hours than others.
Satan didnt actually want equality, he wanted to Be ABOVE God. Thats not realistic. when he attacked Job, he really got Job to thinking he was above everyone else, just cos he was so wealthy and blessed. it got so bad that Job thought in his self righteousness he could tell God what to do.
It's important to remember that God's "equality" (if He calls it that, I'm not sure) is defined much differently than how you seem to be defining it. God does not automatically "even everything out" -- in fact, He often seems to choose to do things in ways that most people would call "unfair."
In the parable of the vineyards, which you mention above (Matthew 20:1-16), the workers did indeed work varying hours but were all paid the same. I believe you've mentioned that you work at a library, right? Would you call it equal if you had worked there for a full 8-hour day, and a co-worker sauntered in for the last 2 hours, but you were both paid the same?
I understand what you're saying in that the parable paints a picture of both people receiving equal pay, but most people would not call this "equal". (I'm just pointing this out to illustrate that God's definition of equality is different.)
One person has more money for less time, which is basically what you are calling out in this thread -- those who have more of something, while others have less. They both might have the same amount of money, but there is still an inequality of time. So even this "equality" was produced "unequally."
In the story of the talents (Matthew 25:14-30), one person is given 1 talent, another 2 talents, and the third person, 5 talents, according to their ability. The first person buries his talent, while the other two double theirs, and in the end, the master says to take the 1 talent from the first person and to give it to the person who now has the most (5 original talents + 5 talents of interest.)
Again, to most people, this would seem unfair. Some would say, "Oh, give the poor first person a chance; maybe he's learned a lesson. and deserves to start over with another talent." Many would be rallying to give it to the person who doubled his 2 talented, so that he could "catch up" with and "be more equal" with the one who now has 10. Most would probably argue, ""Aw c'mon, the one with 10 talents has more than enough, why would he need more?" (Even the servants in the story bristled at the thought.) But God says specifically in verse 29, "For the one who has will be given more, and he will be given more than enough. But the one who has, even what he has will be taken from him."
Sometimes things AREN'T equal, and for whatever His reasons are, God chooses it that way.
Even 1 Corinthians 12:11 says the Holy Spirit will give His gifts to those He chooses, with no mention of an "equal" distribution.
I think it's great that you get us to think about what we have and how we can be serving God with it, but some inequalities are actually what God Himself has decided to do.
Now, I completely agree that if we have more than enough, we should use it to help others.
But I have often wondered: if Sarah and Abraham were alive today, would they shop at Walmart?
I've read estimations that men like Abraham and especially Solomon had wealth that would likely be counted in the billions today. Not just millions, but BILLIONS.
And I often wonder what God asked the to do with all of that excess (because Solomon obviously still had plenty to spare, even after building the temple.)