Recent content by Psalm1

People saying there is a resurrection at Rev 20 in the millineum are not understanding their Bible. It IN NO WAY says or POINTS TO a resurrection in the millennium. Re read it. However in the NIV bible IT SAYS they "came to life" and is WHERE that erroneous doctrine came from . I am amazed you...

There is tons and tons on end times analogy by Jesus using plants and harvest. To just throw all that down is ignorant. So many of you are not at all bible centered.

Yes. It is saying they lived and reigned. Not that they were resurrected at that time after the second coming

That's like trying to say Jesus taking his bride to heaven in mat 25 is the same as him coming after Jacob's trouble on millions of hoses to kill and slaughter and those 2 obvious different comings are exactly the same thing. Or that the angels in Acts 1 were totally deluded when they...

QUOTE Rev 6:9 And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held: Rev 6:10 And they cried with a loud voice, saying, How long, O Lord, holy and true, dost thou not judge and avenge our blood...

1) Obviously he comes for his bride. 2) The Jewish gathering of Rev 14 is vivid. 3) The second coming in power and glory is also vivid and undeniable. The question I am asking is WHY change all 3 into one??? That is my question. I see them clearly, clearly do it. But WHY?

The verses are in post 8. Easily counted. Coming 1 Coming 2 Coming 3. They aren't going away. They are doctrine destroyers

My experience is that they lump all the comings Jesus declared into one because it interferes with a doctrine they have invested in.

Unable?

See post #8

I did. Post #8.

You put Rev 20 into a made up time slot. Jn say saints that died by the hand of the ac. Jn is referring back to their death and resurrection. In fact jn saw them at the start of the trib As the innumerable number. Re read Rev 20 There is a reference there to a previous event. There is no...

I think all positions agree the dead in christ are part of the rapture. What I am doing here in this thread is just simply declaring what the word of God declares.... that there's 3 separate Commings. I know people wanna make the resurrection a pivotal qualifier for doctrine, But that's not...

There are several comings according to those verses. One in Rev 19 on white horses Rev 19 11 And I saw heaven opened, and behold a white horse; and he that sat upon him was called Faithful and True, and in righteousness he doth judge and make war. 12 His eyes were as a flame of fire, and on...

There's a lot of doctrine placing the rapture of the church at different time frames around the tribulation. In the post tribulation rapture doctrine, as well as ,the post wrath rapture doctrine, they Have a cornerstone of one Singular coming of Jesus. My question is, how do they figure that...