Loss of salvation???

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Same word used in verse 15 as verse 23. Only difference is one is second person plural and one is third person singular. Both uses are future active indicative. You also have to look at v21.

The “must do” is love Him. Following His commandments is a result of the “must do”.


Mind telling us what they are?
 
Then how do you know you're saved?
Golly Gee.
Because my trust is in Christ rather than myself.
We are told in 1 John 3:9 - No one born of God makes a practice of sinning, for God's seed abides in him; and he cannot keep on sinning, because he has been born of God.
Please note: It does not say No one born of God ceases to sin, which is the lie that you continually spew forth. . . . .
No! We are a work in progress and will not be perfected until that day. Phil 1:6
 
Mind telling us what they are?
Jn 14:15
I read it with the same approach as the Pythagorean theorem in regard to right triangles and Geometry where, if you know a and b, and you know they are squared then you know what c is, assuming it is also squared. The love is a given and the Me is a given, then obeying is the result.
 
Mind telling us what they are?
Base verb is:
τηρέω (tēréō)
Meaning:
  • to keep
  • to guard
  • to observe
  • to hold fast
John 14:15
τηρήσετε = future active indicative, 2nd person plural
→ “you (plural) will keep”

John 14:23
τηρήσει = future active indicative, 3rd person singular
→ “he will keep”
 
  • Like
Reactions: mailmandan
Jn 14:15
I read it with the same approach as the Pythagorean theorem in regard to right triangles and Geometry where, if you know a and b, and you know they are squared then you know what c is, assuming it is also squared. The love is a given and the Me is a given, then obeying is the result.
Haven’t ever look at it that way but I guess it works. Geometry wasnt my best subject. 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mem
Did you mean "can't" repent? Because the Gospel of Jesus is all about repenting. Just saying.

Regarding Hebrews 6:4, maybe Gill's Exposition will help you

This gave rise to, and seems to favour the error of Novatus, that those who fall into sin after baptism are to be cut off from the communion of the church, and never more to be restored unto it; contrary to the promises of God to returning backsliders, and contrary to facts, as well as to the directions of Christ, and his apostles, to receive and restore such persons; and such a notion tends to set aside the intercession of Christ for fallen believers, and to plunge them into despair

Found here


Hebrews 6:4 - John Gill's Exposition of the Whole Bible - Bíblia Plus

You might also remember that Jesus Himself taught us to pray...

"forgive us our trespasses/debts as we forgive those who tresspass against us/our debtors... 6th Chapter of Matthew... what is funny is how the next two verses seem to be ignored by so very many...

14For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you:

15But if ye forgive not men their trespasses, neither will your Father forgive your trespasses.

Kinda shines a different light on what a lot of people teach, huh?

Trespassing against others and others trespassing against you is very different from losing faith and falling away! I believe this is the ultimate sin for losing salvation.
 
You continue to err in this with the same lack of understanding. You keep making salvation a matter of our faithfulness rather than that of Christ once a person stands in true faith. It's about the faithfulness of Christ rather than our own.

2 Timothy 2:13
If we believe not, yet he abideth faithful: he cannot deny himself.

MM

If you can't undersand how your understanding of 2 Timothy 2.13 is creating a clear conflcit with verse 12...
then it's clear why you have such a misunderstanding of scripture.




What part of that do you not understand? Why this prideful infatuation with self and what you can do for yourself in relation to salvation?

So stating to another "Christian" that we are to obey God
is
prideful infatuation
and saving myself

Yes sir.
Some would cause Christianity to fall....
but Jesus said He would protect his church
and not even the gates of hell will prevail.

Matthew 16:18
18 And I also say to you that you are [m]Peter, and upon this [n]rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it.


The words of this verse are so very clear, and yet you reject what is written while injecting salvation into other verses where it is not the object in view apart from your false injections of salvation where it is not, all because of this belief that salvation hinges upon the feeble and frail faithfulness in ourselves.
Replied to above.

You might want to do a very small study on
2 Timothy 2:12-13

But it might upset your odd theology.


If you believe you preserve your salvation on the basis of your own strength and your own faithfulness while never being able to define that alleged line of loss over which one must step to lose it, you're simply standing in the strength of a religion of man's own making.
I'm not a Pelagain.


Come on! Where's your courage? That confidence you exude in the strength of your own faithfulness is meaningless when you can't even define that line. Pretend I'm a potential convert and I ask you about that line of salvation and where it resides. What will you say? How would you define it for me? After all, it behooves you to lay down the most basic of borders wherein I would have to stand in order to know what to avoid as to where all those land mines are located that you seem to think are out there.

Telling someone that the retention of their salvation is based upon their own faithfulness, that's a false gospel that absolutely is not in force today.

What now?

MM
Actually, our salvation IS based on our retention of our faith.
I provided many verses proving this.

The smart persons following along -who do not even post - will understand this from simple reading of the NT.

And I have noticed that you provide no scripture for your understanding of the NT and your idea that we cannot lose our salvation.

This is because you have NO SUPPORT because your idea is not what the NT teaches.
 
Truly and amazing reality. Wish it weren't.
We're works in process . . .

Ephesians 4:11-16 KJV
11) And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers;
12) For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ:
13) Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ:
14) That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;
15) But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, even Christ:
16) From whom the whole body fitly joined together and compacted by that which every joint supplieth, according to the effectual working in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body unto the edifying of itself in love.

If we are seeking to have unity in truth and love we are in a good Way.

Much Love!
 
  • Love
Reactions: GRACE_ambassador
Ouch believes in Oneness Pentecostalism (nontrinitarian). Has He fallen away from the Faith? Has he been deceived by lying spirits? Is he saved?
He should be left alone.
And, he should leave us alone.

He keeps getting attention by re-introducing his false distorted doctrine, and we dummies keep thinking correction is an option.
He serves only as a distraction.

If he were in a good teaching church, they would have him leave, so others could learn.

He really does not think we would believe his teaching.
He just does not want us to keep growing in ours.

It is spiritual warfare.
In warfare, he would be called a saboteur.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BillG
So, then, what does the reader go on other than their own convictions about which reading is correct?

Mainly manuscripts evidence and then comparisons in Scripture and context. You can see how some discuss it in sites like this.

Whatever the decisions, the other verses I listed earlier IMO tell us what the entire teaching ends up being, especially 1John which IMO makes it clear that love & obedience are tied together, essentially meaning love = obedience. Even John14:15 in a future tense does not have to mean obedience is only motivated by love - Jesus can simply be saying with the future tense that 'you will obey Me' because that's what love for me is - obeying Him like 1John makes clear and the imperative would fit with.
 
Because they are running out of arguments. The Holy Spirit is working on them, and their own words do not make sense to them.
Sorry Qt
I just saw your post to me from quite a while ago.

It was regarding John 14:15

I did want your opinon:

If Jesus is saying that IF we love Him we will obey Him....

isn't that the same as saying that if we do not obey Him,,
it means we do not love Him?

Also, when GOD states YOU WILL
isn't that a command?



I understand everything Jesus says to be a command.
When He states in Matthew 5 BLESSED ARE THE HUMBLE....
He is, in effect, saying that we are to be humble....
this is what He wants...to what degree we can achieve this is a totally different matter.

Some seem to want to lighten what Jesus commands by saying that we do this because
we want to.

Yes sir. With the help of the Holy Spirit we will want to and ever so much more.
But we also MUST and that this words bothers some on these Forums does cause me to have concern.
 
We're works in process . . .

Ephesians 4:11-16 KJV
11) And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers;
12) For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ:
13) Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ:
14) That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;
15) But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, even Christ:
16) From whom the whole body fitly joined together and compacted by that which every joint supplieth, according to the effectual working in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body unto the edifying of itself in love.

If we are seeking to have unity in truth and love we are in a good Way.

Much Love!

Doesn't say much for current collective/corporate maturity, does it...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toknow and markss
Mainly manuscripts evidence and then comparisons in Scripture and context. You can see how some discuss it in sites like this.

Whatever the decisions, the other verses I listed earlier IMO tell us what the entire teaching ends up being, especially 1John which IMO makes it clear that love & obedience are tied together, essentially meaning love = obedience. Even John14:15 in a future tense does not have to mean obedience is only motivated by love - Jesus can simply be saying with the future tense that 'you will obey Me' because that's what love for me is - obeying Him like 1John makes clear and the imperative would fit with.
Just caught this while replying to another member.

This would be also for @Mem who asked a good question.

What to do with conflicting scripure?

First, I don't believe there is conflicting scripture,,,,
just that not every single teaching could be repeated in every single sentence.

The bible is to be read as a whole thought and not to be cut up into different divisions.

I started reading the Early Fathers...Apostolic to be precise, pre-nicene,
and have found it to be very helpful.

Protestants that have studied church history also mention them and refer to them.
Wes Huff comes to mind, and just yesterday, GodLogic mentioned them.

For instance, I like Ignatius of Antioch. He was a student of John and Peter.

Everyone might not agree...I found it to be helpful and those that I read are teaching
right out of the bible and just after the Apostolic age.
And of course,,,,it's the Apostles that taught them...
the same Apostles that wrote the NT.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2ndTimeIsTheCharm
If Jesus is saying that IF we love Him we will obey Him....

And?

What is He telling us to obey?

The many Christians who walk in human confidence can not obey what is required of them.

Jesus answered,
“It is written:
‘Man shall not live on bread alone, but on every word that comes from the mouth of God.’”

Mat 4:4​

How much have we stored in our spirit?
Are we learning more and more every day?
Or, is it the same thing, over and over again?
Always arguing.... Never knowing the truth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TruthDefender
MM

If you can't undersand how your understanding of 2 Timothy 2.13 is creating a clear conflcit with verse 12...
then it's clear why you have such a misunderstanding of scripture.






So stating to another "Christian" that we are to obey God
is
prideful infatuation
and saving myself

Yes sir.
Some would cause Christianity to fall....
but Jesus said He would protect his church
and not even the gates of hell will prevail.

Matthew 16:18
18 And I also say to you that you are [m]Peter, and upon this [n]rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it.


Replied to above.

You might want to do a very small study on
2 Timothy 2:12-13

But it might upset your odd theology.



I'm not a Pelagain.



Actually, our salvation IS based on our retention of our faith.
I provided many verses proving this.

The smart persons following along -who do not even post - will understand this from simple reading of the NT.

And I have noticed that you provide no scripture for your understanding of the NT and your idea that we cannot lose our salvation.

This is because you have NO SUPPORT because your idea is not what the NT teaches.

I agree with your last few paragraphs (1, 3, and 4) with an additional statement:

Salvation is dependent on faith plus doing His will in the NT.
 
Just caught this while replying to another member.

This would be also for @Mem who asked a good question.

What to do with conflicting scripure?

First, I don't believe there is conflicting scripture,,,,
just that not every single teaching could be repeated in every single sentence.

The bible is to be read as a whole thought and not to be cut up into different divisions.

I started reading the Early Fathers...Apostolic to be precise, pre-nicene,
and have found it to be very helpful.

Protestants that have studied church history also mention them and refer to them.
Wes Huff comes to mind, and just yesterday, GodLogic mentioned them.

For instance, I like Ignatius of Antioch. He was a student of John and Peter.

Everyone might not agree...I found it to be helpful and those that I read are teaching
right out of the bible and just after the Apostolic age.
And of course,,,,it's the Apostles that taught them...
the same Apostles that wrote the NT.

Beware of men’s writings and ideas!!
This is where we can error and get away from what God teaches.

We have all that we need from the Bible! We don’t need men’s opinions.