Frankly, I don't understand it.
Maybe the other member does.
OBEY means to OBEY.
Apparently, you don't like that word.
If you don't understand what he said, how can you determine what he likes or doesn't like?
Frankly, I don't understand it.
Maybe the other member does.
OBEY means to OBEY.
Apparently, you don't like that word.
Some people like to apply it to others but not themselves,
Worse yet is when people on here intimate another is arrogant for daring question the status quo of doctrinal dogma among Evangelicals. That hit me yesterday.
MM
My reply was not convoluted. You seem to conflate obeying the Son by choosing to believe in the Son with obeying the Son after one believes and is saved. Again, to obey the Son here in (John 3:36) is to choose to believe in the Son, just as we read in John 3:18. Folks who conflate faith and works and teach salvation by faith and works typically stumble over the word "obey" in John 3:36. (NASB)
That is something I value in a good forum, being challenged by reasonable and knowledgeable Christians, to help me examine my views carefully.Personally, it'd seem to me that I could be surer that I'm right if I carefully examine all the ways that I might possibly be wrong.
It means that faith in Christ is the sole means in which a person is justified or made right with God. It implies that rituals, works, and human effort cannot earn salvation.We ARE saved by ONLY FAITH.
But FAITH ALONE is not biblical.
What does FAITH ALONE mean?
Christ saves us through faith based on the merits of His finished work of redemption "alone" and not based on the merits of our works. (Romans 3:24-26; 4:5-6; 11:6; Ephesians 2:8,9; Titus 3:5; 2 Timothy 1:9)It means that faith in Christ is the sole means in which a person is justified or made right with God. It implies that rituals, works, and human effort cannot earn salvation.
The message Peter presented included quotes from Joel and the Psalms that drew a massive crowd of Jews to the Messiah. The fulfillment was in line with the purpose of the feast:
Acts 2:30-37
Therefore being a prophet, (David) and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne;
He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption.
This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we all are witnesses.
Therefore being by the right hand of God exalted, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath shed forth this, which ye now see and hear.
For David is not ascended into the heavens: but he saith himself, The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand,
Until I make thy foes thy footstool. (Psa. 110:1)
Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ."
Note: The hearers of Peter's message would have understood the connection between Jesus, the risen Messiah, and the Jewish Feast of Pentecost, the second harvest, they were currently attending. Now it all made sense. Jesus was the Passover lamb, and the firstfruit of the Firstfruits harvest; He rose, and others came out of their graves as well when Jesus was resurrected. (Matt. 27:53)
Back to Acts 2, the next verse indicates the hearers wanted to know what they must do in order to be part of this the beginning of the second harvest. Pentecost was the fourth feast held fifty days after Firstfruits; where more crops were harvested then at Firstfruits.
"Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and brethren, what shall we do? Peter said, Repent, and be baptized EVERYONE of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sin and you shall receive the Holy Ghost." (37-38) The same message was then carried into all nations.
Consider, the second harvest in Leviticus is a foreshadow concerning both Jew and Gentile. (23:17) The instruction includes two wave loaves of equal weight and baked with leaven that are called "firstfruits". That the loaves are baked with leaven represents sinful man. And beings they are "firstfruits" they are redeemed men. The harvest that began at Pentecost continues. (3000 died at the giving of the OT law at Mt. Sinai, and 3000 were saved after belief and obedience to the NT gospel.)
"Ye shall bring out of your habitations two wave loaves of two tenth deals: they shall be of fine flour; they shall be baken with leaven; they are the firstfruits unto the Lord."
As you referenced, Paul's comment concerning salvation in 1 Cor. 15:1-4 indicates everyone must believe is that Jesus' died, was buried, and resurrected. And as I pointed out the scripture reveals that is the first thing that all must believe; there is more to the gospel message.
Per your statement concerning the wall of partition. According to Ephesians 2:14-16, Jesus dealt with the wall of partition between Jew and Gentile at the cross, during his crucifixion.
Lastly, water baptism is by no means a badge of merit. But rather God offering forgiveness to everyone who believes and obeys the command in association with Jesus sacrifice; regardless of this fact not a single person deserves it=unmerited favor.
2 of 2
We should not reject baptism or trivialize it or demean it.
We should do everything Jesus said to do.
God bless you too!
Father commands you to believe in His Son, and so you obey Him. The Son commands you to come to Him and He will give you rest, and so you obey Him.
Does the hesitation to understand come from that this can't be because it's way too so easy to do?
Knee jerk defense mechanism happens when men perceive that a foot might be coming too close of risk in grazing their groin. Give a bit of slack in such cases that you're dealing with matters which they have set in their bowels and so closely guard. They may come around if they sense you're only attempting to gird them in strength rather than, well, what most of us are used to.
Personally, it'd seem to me that I could be surer that I'm right if I carefully examine all the ways that I might possibly be wrong.
What does the fulness of the Godhead have to do with the FORMULA for baptism.Jesus gave the command to baptize in the name of... What name was Jesus referring to? The actions of His apostles supply the answer. They obeyed His command by consistently baptizing people in the name of Jesus. It is clear they understood a truth Paul reveals to the Colossians; In Jesus dwells all the fulness of the Godhead. (Col. 2:9-13)
Agreed. But we're not ignorant of scripture.What I was pointing out about ignorance being no excuse is that receiving the Holy Ghost, and having one's sin remitted in obedience to water baptism are essential elements of the NT rebirth. (John 3:3-5)
I believe Luke 12 references different degrees of punishment regarding ignorance relative to a born again believer's walk in general.
Why Cornelius and others were required to be water baptized in order to be saved is attested to in various places within scripture, Note first, God's truth concerning any topic is established by at least 2-3 scriptures. (Matt. 18:16, 2 Cor. 13:1) And scripture reveals (Acts 2:38) and confirms (Acts 8:12-18, 19:1-7) both receiving the Holy Ghost and being water baptized in the name of Jesus are requirements for everyone regardless of nationality. As such the same was required of Cornelius and those with him in order to be granted repentance unto life. (Acts 10:43-48, 11:15-18) Personally, I have come to believe in the possibility that the gospel requirements first presented in Acts 2:38, acted upon by those who placed their trust in Jesus, may actually address man's spirit, soul and body individually. (1 Thess. 5:23)
Lastly, I believe God will shine light on what He requires pertaining to the NT rebirth when hungry hearts seek Him. (Cornelius is a perfect example)
Jesus said; those who hunger and thirst after righteousness will be filled.
OKIf you don't understand what he said, how can you determine what he likes or doesn't like?
Convoluted and not understandable?OK
I wasn't going to respond,
but I see that @mailmandan gave you a LIKE.
Let me assure you sawdust...
I know what mailmandan believes since I've been posting to him
for about 10 years.
The reason I didn't UNDERSTAND what he wrote...
is because what he wrote is CONVOLUTED and not understandable.
Except by those who vehemently agree with ANYTHING HE STATES.
I, OTOH, like to understand to what I'm replying.
I'm not here to waste my time ...
I'm here to have serious convesation.
OKYeah, this topic needed some humor. I don't see it ending any time soon.
Romans 8:30
And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified
View attachment 285836
View attachment 285837
![]()
View attachment 285840
View attachment 285841
View attachment 285842
No Dan...Convoluted and not understandable?This is actually very simple to understand.
John 3:36 - The one who believes in the Son has eternal life; but the one who does not obey the Son will not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him. (NASB)
DOES NOT OBEY THE SON = REFUSES TO BELIEVE IN THE SON.
John 3:36 - The one who believes in the Son has eternal life, but the one who refuses to believe in the Son will not see life; instead, the wrath of God remains on him. (HCSB)
You meanMy reply was not convoluted. You seem to conflate obeying the Son by choosing to believe in the Son with obeying the Son after one believes and is saved. Again, to obey the Son here in (John 3:36) is to choose to believe in the Son, just as we read in John 3:18. Folks who conflate faith and works and teach salvation by faith and works typically stumble over the word "obey" in John 3:36. (NASB)
Well, you got 3 LIKES.It means that faith in Christ is the sole means in which a person is justified or made right with God. It implies that rituals, works, and human effort cannot earn salvation.
Clouds.There was a point in studies some time ago where I began understanding that "if" was one of the biggest words in Scripture. The Greek has a few different ways to word it to indicate what type of argument is being put forth when it's being stated. I began seeing some of its uses as no different than commands or instruction on what to do or not do - what to think or not think.
There are right ways to use it and wrong ways to use it. Speculation seems to be used a bit too much and one of the bigger flaws in reasoning seems to be drawing conclusions based upon arguments from silence, which at times is just a hypothetical "if" being asserted as fact.
Think I'll start watching clouds more... One of my earliest recollections about God was being very young laying in a field on a beautiful day watching the clouds do what they do and wondering where they came from - who made them. I kind of inherently knew it was a "who".
No Dan...
other posters stated that it was difficult to understand.
You don't care for the word OBEY.
You fight it tooth and nail.
THOSE WHO DO NOT OBEY,,,will see the wrath of God.
OBEY = DOING GOOD WORKS.
Works...another word you don't like.
We must believe in the Son in order to be saved.
IF we do NOT OBEY the Son....we will see the wrath of God.
If BELIEVERS do not obey.....
the non-believers are ALREADY LOST.
OK
Wait.
I'm not reformed.
But I still like your sense of humor!