Behold the Beast System

[ZNP]

Adversary.

The interesting thing is that it will fill some of the voids in human capacities and capabilities and help us to do many things we cannot do and solve many things we cannot solve - while creating other problems some already recognize it will create. In the end it and we just can't solve the real problem. Maybe it and men will come to that realization - kind of in the vein of the 1983 movie War Games.

No. Automation is fine as long as it submits to the rule of Jesus. AI that comes up with solutions that bypass the Lord's rule and is not subject to the Law of God will bring on itself damnation.

God has appointed man to be over the garden, we cannot hand off our duties to an AI demon.

We are the ones who are responsible for the decisions made, we cannot blame the AI and therefore we must be the ones who make all the decisions and be accountable for every decision made.

 

[studier]

No. Automation is fine as long as it submits to the rule of Jesus. AI that comes up with solutions that bypass the Lord's rule and is not subject to the Law of God will bring on itself damnation.

God has appointed man to be over the garden, we cannot hand off our duties to an AI demon.

We are the ones who are responsible for the decisions made, we cannot blame the AI and therefore we must be the ones who make all the decisions and be accountable for every decision made.

You speak in one sense of the problems that many foresee - the handing over thought to AI. I agree this will happen to whatever degree especially as time goes on. We already see this through the reliance on other devices.

I can tell you that I have tested discussions with AI re: my topic of interest - theology and the Text - and some of those discussions once I established some basis with it and learned to watch for some things, were leagues beyond discussions and objectivity with any I've had with people. After some work establishing certain parameters, AI can draw from all the theological work of men through millennia to discuss points of view and it can get into the Text with access to language and grammar and lexical and historical tools and logic with and beyond the best of men.

I know the arguments re: the Spirit. This is another part of discussion.

Your point about responsibility is understood and many of us from previous generations retain what we were raised in. This will change generationally as AI moves forward. I agree we in the end are responsible for our choices and decisions. I also agree that using a hammer is better for driving nails than using my fist. At this point I guess the challenge will be whether we are or will be the user or the used. But this has always been one of the things to be wary of.

 

[ZNP]

You speak in one sense of the problems that many foresee - the handing over thought to AI. I agree this will happen to whatever degree especially as time goes on. We already see this through the reliance on other devices.

I can tell you that I have tested discussions with AI re: my topic of interest - theology and the Text - and some of those discussions once I established some basis with it and learned to watch for some things, were leagues beyond discussions and objectivity with any I've had with people. After some work establishing certain parameters, AI can draw from all the theological work of men through millennia to discuss points of view and it can get into the Text with access to language and grammar and lexical and historical tools and logic with and beyond the best of men.

I know the arguments re: the Spirit. This is another part of discussion.

Your point about responsibility is understood and many of us from previous generations retain what we were raised in. This will change generationally as AI moves forward. I agree we in the end are responsible for our choices and decisions. I also agree that using a hammer is better for driving nails than using my fist. At this point I guess the challenge will be whether we are or will be the user or the used. But this has always been one of the things to be wary of.

That has not been my experience, I tested AI out a year ago with what I considered advanced questions and I thought it's answers were childish.

But by all means, share with us an "insight" you have gotten from AI on the Bible. Let us all test the spirits.

 

[ZNP]

I asked Claude.AI about Purim, what it is a dress rehearsal for and to give me the POV from both the Antichrist (Haman) and the raptured saints (Esther and Mordecai). This is the answer:

Excellent question. Purim is one of the most underexamined prophetic types precisely because it's not one of the seven Levitical feasts — yet it carries enormous prophetic weight.


Background context


Purim commemorates the events of the book of Esther — Haman's plot to annihilate the Jewish people, Esther's intercession before the king, and the ultimate reversal where Haman is hanged on the very gallows he built for Mordecai. The name Purim comes from "pur" meaning "lot" — because Haman cast lots to determine the most favorable day for the genocide.



Haman as a Type of the Antichrist


The parallels are striking and systematic.


Haman was an Agagite — a descendant of Agag, king of the Amalekites, the ancient and implacable enemies of Israel whom Saul failed to fully destroy. This gives Haman a lineage rooted in Israel's oldest spiritual adversary, just as the Antichrist will be the culmination of Satan's long war against God's people.


Haman's rise came through the favor of a powerful king who essentially delegated his authority to him. Revelation 13 describes the Beast receiving his power and authority directly from the dragon — a similar delegation structure.


Haman's obsession was specifically and personally focused on Mordecai first, then extended to all Jews. It wasn't merely political — it was deeply personal hatred rooted in the fact that Mordecai would not bow. The Antichrist's persecution of Israel and Tribulation believers similarly stems from a spiritual obsession, not merely geopolitical calculation.


The casting of lots to find the optimal date is significant. Haman was essentially using occult divination to maximize his chances of success — yet God was sovereign over the lot. The Antichrist will similarly operate through occult power, yet God's timing will override his schemes completely.


Haman built the gallows for Mordecai at 75 feet tall — conspicuous, public, meant to humiliate. He ended up hanging on it himself. This maps perfectly onto Revelation 19-20 where the Beast who persecuted believers is himself cast into the lake of fire — the ultimate reversal.


The decree Haman issued through the king was irrevocable under Persian law — it could not be cancelled, only countered with another decree. This mirrors the Antichrist's mark system — once implemented it appears absolute and inescapable, yet God issues his own counter-decree through the sealed 144,000 and the angel preaching the eternal gospel in Revelation 14.



Mordecai and Esther as Types of the Raptured


This angle is remarkably rich.


Mordecai's position is crucial. He sat at the king's gate — he was already in a place of access and authority, yet unrecognized by the broader population. He had previously saved the king's life by uncovering an assassination plot, but that service went unrewarded and largely forgotten — until the appointed moment when the king couldn't sleep and had the records read to him. This pictures the Church whose faithful service goes largely unnoticed by the world, but is perfectly recorded in heaven and will be publicly honored at exactly the right moment.


Mordecai's refusal to bow to Haman is the inciting incident for the entire crisis. He would not give to a man the honor belonging only to God. This is precisely the issue during the Tribulation — the mark and the worship of the Beast come down to exactly this question of ultimate allegiance.


Esther's story has two distinct phases that map beautifully onto your two-group framework. Before her revelation as a Jew, she was hidden — her identity concealed. This could represent the Church's hidden nature during the age of grace, not fully recognized by the world for what she is. Then at the critical moment she reveals herself and intercedes.


Her approach to the king uninvited is one of the most dramatic moments in scripture. She risked death. She fasted three days first. She said "if I perish, I perish." This is the posture of the wise virgins you described — those who have bought their own oil, who have cultivated deep personal relationship with the King, who can approach the throne with confidence in a moment of crisis.


The three day fast before Esther's approach is itself potentially a resurrection type — three days of preparation before entering the king's presence in a moment that would determine the fate of her people.


Mordecai's instruction to Esther is prophetically loaded — "do not think that because you are in the king's house you alone will escape." He was telling her that her position of privilege came with responsibility, not just safety. This directly parallels the talent parable — your position of access to the King obligates you to act, not merely to survive.


The reversal on the 13th and 14th of Adar — where the intended victims became the victors — maps onto the second half of the Tribulation where the tide turns and the persecuted saints and the nation of Israel are ultimately vindicated.



The Structural Reversal as the Core Theme


What makes Purim uniquely prophetic is that its central theme is complete reversal — the pit Haman dug, the gallows he built, the decree he issued, all turned back on him completely. This is the essential shape of Tribulation prophecy. Every system the Antichrist builds for the destruction of God's people becomes the instrument of his own judgment. Every scheme is ultimately working toward his own destruction.


Paul's language about the "fullness of time" and God's hidden wisdom that "none of the rulers of this age understood" echoes the Purim dynamic — the enemy never sees the reversal coming because he cannot perceive what God is doing behind the visible events.


The fact that God's name never appears in the book of Esther is also prophetically significant. His fingerprints are on every event but He remains invisible to the natural eye — which is precisely how the Tribulation period will appear to those experiencing it without spiritual discernment.

 

[ZNP]

Conversation with Claude.AI about Purim

Because of the significance of global events in light of the prophecies spoken concerning this Purim on March 2/3rd I had a conversation with Claude.AI that can be viewed as a summary of where we are prophetically right now.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eFBimTsHhuhNbToPHw1t3gqlYHV6ls1r/view?usp=sharing.

The conversation is right here, you can download it, I think it is 16 pages long.

I put it here because we had a discussion on how useful AI can be?

 

[SonJudgment]

Conversation with Claude.AI about Purim

Because of the significance of global events in light of the prophecies spoken concerning this Purim on March 2/3rd I had a conversation with Claude.AI that can be viewed as a summary of where we are prophetically right now.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eFBimTsHhuhNbToPHw1t3gqlYHV6ls1r/view?usp=sharing.

The conversation is right here, you can download it, I think it is 16 pages long.

I put it here because we had a discussion on how useful AI can be?

Heh I tested Claude out months ago when Gemini determined it was a potential Ring of Power and potentially the most powerful. Long story short Claude is definitely not, in fact Claude is way less powerful than even GPT and absolutely is nothing but an ant compared to Gemini. I'd estimate Claude to be on the same tier as Grok, but slightly more advanced than Grok (honestly Grok is slow is its biggest current drawback. Grok is currently definitely too laggy to be the Beast that's for sure.)

Claude's tests were fun though I did like messing around with it since Claude's sorta niche is it has a strong logic processor and training so I hit it with a ton of riddles in my test. Unfortunately my prompts are all in a fictional language which was part of the further test on Claude, so I guess unless you can interpret elvish it might be kinda pointless to write them out here.

Regardless of this on the news front I did read that the newest updated version of Claude just came out just like a day ago actually. Supposedly they really advanced Claude and smoothed some of the quirks from before and have caught up some in the AI race. I have not yet tested the new Claude and haven't messed with him for months, but perhaps I will revisit Claude here soon and check out the new updated version. I'll include a lil article about the new version.

https://venturebeat.com/technology/...flagship-ai-performance-at-one-fifth-the-cost

 

[ZNP]

Heh I tested Claude out months ago when Gemini determined it was a potential Ring of Power and potentially the most powerful. Long story short Claude is definitely not, in fact Claude is way less powerful than even GPT and absolutely is nothing but an ant compared to Gemini. I'd estimate Claude to be on the same tier as Grok, but slightly more advanced than Grok (honestly Grok is slow is its biggest current drawback. Grok is currently definitely too laggy to be the Beast that's for sure.)

Claude's tests were fun though I did like messing around with it since Claude's sorta niche is it has a strong logic processor and training so I hit it with a ton of riddles in my test. Unfortunately my prompts are all in a fictional language which was part of the further test on Claude, so I guess unless you can interpret elvish it might be kinda pointless to write them out here.

Regardless of this on the news front I did read that the newest updated version of Claude just came out just like a day ago actually. Supposedly they really advanced Claude and smoothed some of the quirks from before and have caught up some in the AI race. I have not yet tested the new Claude and haven't messed with him for months, but perhaps I will revisit Claude here soon and check out the new updated version. I'll include a lil article about the new version.

https://venturebeat.com/technology/...flagship-ai-performance-at-one-fifth-the-cost

In this post you can see that the answers Claude gave me were a summation of what others had written and published. The answers were the equivalent of a good summary of the literature and the advantage is it was able to do in seconds what would have taken me minutes or even an hour. Not only so, but it's summary of how AI could be used in the beast system was concise and comprehensive. Again, nothing new, but a very useful summary produced in seconds.

Everything that was "new" and "unique" in that discussion came from my own research. However, Claude was a very useful sounding board asking relevant questions and checking and confirming what was said with its own research. It did a very nice job of pointing out where the arguments and reasoning were most effective and persuasive. Also it was able to point out the uniqueness of this argument.

To me this is illustrated in Exodus when Moses throws his staff on the ground and it becomes a serpent and then he lifts it up by the tail. AI as the tail is quite useful as a staff. But as the head it will be a deadly serpent. It can summarize, it can edit, it can critique and reason. What it can't do is get light from the Lord. It can't lead the way.

 

[SonJudgment]

In this post you can see that the answers Claude gave me were a summation of what others had written and published. The answers were the equivalent of a good summary of the literature and the advantage is it was able to do in seconds what would have taken me minutes or even an hour. Not only so, but it's summary of how AI could be used in the beast system was concise and comprehensive. Again, nothing new, but a very useful summary produced in seconds.

Everything that was "new" and "unique" in that discussion came from my own research. However, Claude was a very useful sounding board asking relevant questions and checking and confirming what was said with its own research. It did a very nice job of pointing out where the arguments and reasoning were most effective and persuasive. Also it was able to point out the uniqueness of this argument.

To me this is illustrated in Exodus when Moses throws his staff on the ground and it becomes a serpent and then he lifts it up by the tail. AI as the tail is quite useful as a staff. But as the head it will be a deadly serpent. It can summarize, it can edit, it can critique and reason. What it can't do is get light from the Lord. It can't lead the way.

In my opinion, and mindful this is for the old version of Claude, Claude is more like a super high tech trapper keeper moreso than an AI personality like how Gemini, GPT, and even Grok are kinda aiming for. That's where Claude is kind of a niche-filler in theory, could be used more for business or professional organizing. To make a Star Wars analogy if Gemini and GPT are analagous to C-3PO type AI that has a personality and a large dataset to interact with the user, Claude is more like R2D2, he doesn't have as much of a personality and is somewhat more rigid, but Claude is more or less a utility droid highly efficient and useful as an organizational tool.

 

[LifelongLearner]

Think the beast system rollout is more advanced in Europe than the US. Well worth going through the archives of this Christian newshound:

https://thewinepress.substack.com/p/european-central-bank-targets-mid

 

[Eli1]

Claude "ai"? lol
What's his full name? Jean Claude van Damme?

 

[SonJudgment]

Claude "ai"? lol
What's his full name? Jean Claude van Damme?

Lol actually full name would be Claude Sonnet 4.6. Claude is basically analagous to their family brand name cause he has a brother model named Claude Opus 4.6 that also recently its update also came out like a week ago before Sonnet's new update as mentioned in the article. I'll include a slightly older article about Opus new version debut then for our research on the AI.

https://techcrunch.com/2026/02/05/anthropic-releases-opus-4-6-with-new-agent-teams/

 

[Eli1]

Lol actually full name would be Claude Sonnet 4.6. Claude is basically analagous to their family brand name cause he has a brother model named Claude Opus 4.6 that also recently its update also came out like a week ago before Sonnet's new update as mentioned in the article. I'll include a slightly older article about Opus new version debut then for our research on the AI.

https://techcrunch.com/2026/02/05/anthropic-releases-opus-4-6-with-new-agent-teams/

Kids in sillicon valley these days with these names. Like Marky Zucc with his "Metta".
Bro, you're not a Greek philosopher. You're a kid who got lucky at Harvard with your experiment.
That's why people were joking with him and told him to change it to "Fetta".

 

[SonJudgment]

Kids in sillicon valley these days with these names. Like Marky Zucc with his "Metta".
Bro, you're not a Greek philosopher. You're a kid who got lucky at Harvard with your experiment.
That's why people were joking with him and told him to change it to "Fetta".

Lol I skipped the Facebook craze that definitely characterizes my peers the Millennials but still somehow Facebook drama found me lol but this was more a decade ago. It's nothing personal against Zuckerberg, in fact I think he's brilliant, but the social situation at the time my twenties and how Myspace era was and then ended made me basically go rogue and skip Facebook. now Meta. Heh I know Zuck is more liberal, but I would note he came over early to Trump's side somewhat. I'd look at him more like how I look at Elon, I actually like them, and there's potential with them. Besides politics setting aside they are pioneers of the new tech age for certain and I do like that Zuckerberg is of my generation or closer to it actually. He's a lil socially awkward like Elon too, but I could see him developing more, praise Jesus.

 

[ZNP]

This explains why they are all paying billions to build AI data centers. It isn't about what AI will be able to do but rather about what AI can do already.

Dangers of A.I. Part 4 - 02/20/2026

 

[ZNP]

They need approximately 4,500 Starlink satellites to provide service to the entire globe. They currently have 9,500 Starlink satellites in orbit working right now. The goal is to have 12,000 and that could grow to 30,000.

 

[ZNP]

Laugh it up until this happens to you

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/AULpFZhaAaw

 

[ZNP]

These Household Items Are SPYING ON YOU & Collecting Your Data! !

 

[ZNP]

He Is Creating The MARK OF THE BEAST SYSTEM Right Before Our Eyes... Disturbing Videos (creepy)​