Ouch, thank you for taking the time to repeat it.It's the second time I lost everything...the first time I was able to repeat.
When the Israelites were exiled to Babylon after the destruction of the 1st Temple, then there was a large portion of the Mosaic Law that they could no longer obey, but that didn't mean that they shouldn't be faithful to obey the parts that they could obey.This is generally true for all of scripture.
But it was my point exactly...
today, in modern USA..we cannot follow MOST of the laws in the OT Mosaic Law.
You granted that the categories of law are human contracts and are not based on what Paul said, so. you should not interpret him was referring to the moral law, especially when you have no way to establish a list of which laws he considered to be part of the moral law.Right.
One of the reasons for the LAW, was so that we could know when we sin.
Agreed.
BUT
By this I'm referring to the Moral Law and Paul was referring to the moral law too because he stated over and over again that we are not saved by following THE LAW of Moses.
Paul said we are to follow the Law of faith...in Christ, of course.
Romans 1:5
5 Through him we received grace and apostleship to call all the Gentiles to the obedience that comes from[c] faith for his name’s sake.
We are to follow the obedience OF FAITH...for Jesus.
NOT the Law of Moses.
Jesus saves us from our sin (Matthew 1:21) and it is by the Law of Moses that we have knowledge of what sin is, so while we can't earn our salvation even as the result of having perfect obedience to the Law of Moses, Jesus graciously teaching us to be doers of it is intrinsically the way that he is giving us his gift of saving us from not being doers of it. It is contradictory to think that we should have faith in God but not in His instructions or faith in God's Word made flesh but not in God's Word.
We should understand the meaning of "pleroo" in a way that is in accordance with the context of how it is used, so while I grant that it has within its range of meanings to mean essentially the same thing as abolishing or relaxing it, I don't see any justification for understanding "pleroo" as having a meaning that would contradict the context of Jesus saying that he came not to abolish it and Jesus warning against relaxing the least part of it or teaching others to relax the least part of it. The Bible doesn't present the Law of Moses as being specific task that once we have completed or accomplished it, then we no longer need to obey it, but rather it presents it in language like "this is a statue forever throughout your generations". It is not the case for example that if we keep the Sabbath holy, then we have fulfilled our obligation to that command and no longer need to do that, but rather it is something that we need to keep doing in perpetuity. When a husband is fulfilling his marriage vows, then he is correctly acting in accordance with what he has vowed, not ending his marriage. In Galatians 6:2, bearing one another's burdens fulfills the Law of Christ, yet you do not consistently interpret that as abolishing the Law of Christ. If Jesus had meant that he really came to abolish the Law, then why did he immediately proceed to teach how to correctly obey it and continue to live in obedience to it? In Romans 15:18-19, Paul said that he fulfilled the Gospel, so do you think that he abolished it?Yes. It certainly sounds like this.
BUT
Jesus said He did not come to ABOLISH the Law
but to fulfill it. So yes, it's importanat to know what fulfill means.
View attachment 285650
We're not going to agree as to the meaning of the word pleroo.
This is from Strong's no. 4137...pleroo
pléroó: To fill, to make full, to complete, to fulfill
Original Word: πληρόω
Part of Speech: Verb
Transliteration: pléroó
Pronunciation: play-ro'-o
Phonetic Spelling: (play-ro'-o)
KJV: accomplish, X after, (be) complete, end, expire, fill (up), fulfil, (be, make) full (come), fully preach, perfect, supply
NASB: fulfill, fulfilled, filled, made full, completed, fill, made complete
Word Origin: [from G4134 (πλήρης - full)]
1. to fully, completely fill
2. (literally) to cram (a net), level up (a hollow)
3. (figuratively) to fully supply, satisfy, execute (an office), finish (a period or task), verify (or coincide with a prediction), etc.
Strong's Exhaustive Concordance
accomplish, complete, fulfill
From pleres; to make replete, i.e. (literally) to cram (a net), level up (a hollow), or (figuratively) to furnish (or imbue, diffuse, influence), satisfy, execute (an office), finish (a period or task), verify (or coincide with a prediction), etc. -- accomplish, X after, (be) complete, end, expire, fill (up), fulfil, (be, make) full (come), fully preach, perfect, supply.
This, coupled with theological teaching, can only mean that Jesus came to COMPLETE,,,
to SATISFY, to ACCOMPLISH, to END the Law.
Moreover, a number of the definitions that you listed that are in accordance with the definition from the NAS Greek Lexicon that I quoted, such as teaching a complete understanding of how to obey the Law of Moses, filling up our understanding of it, or to fully preach it. The definition that I quoted is the only definition that it listed that is specifically in regard to fulfilling the law, it fits with what Jesus immediately proceeded to do next after he said that he came to fulfill the law, it fits with how other verses use it, and it fits with how other Jewish writings speak about fulfilling the law in the sense of correctly meeting our obligation to it, and it doesn't have Jesus contradicting himself, so please give justification for why you think that my definition is incorrect and for why your definition should be preferred.
Jesus was about to fulfill the law by correcting things that the people had heard the Pharisees teaching by teaching how to correctly obey the law as it was originally intended, so our righteousness must exceed that of the Pharisees because they were not correctly following it.Jesus said in Matthew 5:17......that our righteousness must exceed that of the pharisees, who followed The Law...
what does that mean to you?
Everything in the Law of Moses is either in regard to how to love God and our neighbor, which is why Jesus said in Matthew 22:36-40 that those are the greatest two commandments and that all of the other commandments hang on them, so love fulfills the law because it is showing a correct understanding of what it about how to do. The position that we should obey the greatest two commandments is also the position that we should obey the commandments that hang on them, such as if we love God and our neighbor, then we won't commit idolatry, murder, adultery, theft, favoritism, kidnapping, rape, and so forth for the rest of the Law of Moses. Someone who was correctly living in obedience to the greatest two commandments would be indistinguishable from someone who was correctly living in obedience to the rest of the Law of Moses because they would both be following the same example that Jesus set for us to follow. It would be contradictory for someone to think that we should just obey God's command to love, but not His other commands for how to love.HOW has loving my neighbor fulfilled the LAW,,,,
It DOES fulfill what Jesus taught:
LOVE GOD
LOVE YOUR NEIGHBOR AS YOURSELF
It fulfills what Jesus taught.
It makes what He taught COMPLETE.
This simple command puts AN END to all the other ones.
The word FULFILL retains its proper meaning.
Jesus spent his ministry teaching his followers to obey the Law of Moses by word and by example, so if Paul also taught the same thing that Jesus did, then he also taught to obey the Law of Moses by word and by example.Paul absolutely taught the same as Jesus did.
Agreed.
So what does the Messianic era have to do with following THE LAW.
And I don't know that you ever defined THE LAW of Moses.
Also, if you could find those verses you had posted to me,,,I'd be happy to respond.
(the post I lost).
Acts 20:24-25 “But I do not account my life of any value nor as precious to myself, if only I may finish my course and the ministry that I received from the Lord Jesus, to testify to the gospel of the grace of God. And now, behold, I know that none of you among whom I have gone about proclaiming the kingdom will see my face again.”
Acts 28:23 “When they had appointed a day for him, they came to him at his lodging in greater numbers. From morning till evening he expounded to them, testifying to the kingdom of God and trying to convince them about Jesus both from the Law of Moses and from the Prophets.”