Saint Peter And His Keys

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

GRACE_ambassador

Well-known member
Feb 22, 2021
3,899
2,226
113
Midwest
Precious friends, just released for your prayerful/Careful consideration; and please
pray for all precious roman catholics, as they also should have/know/believe
God's Precious Word Of Truth, Even as we do, eh?:

"Doubtless you have heard of Saint Peter, but you must not believe all that you have
heard about him. He is not here to defend himself against all these false reports, so
it seems unfair to take advantage of him during his absence. He is still living and he
is coming back to earth someday. Now this is not a false report. This is the truth.

Peter has been accused of being the first pope of Rome....

For anyone who really desires to rid the story of Simon Peter of falsehood
and fiction, there is first-hand information, and it will do your soul good to
get acquainted with this intensely human character—not a myth, but a
real-to-goodness natural man, just like the rest of us, who came in contact
with a Supernatural Power that transformed his life...

...Peter never went to Rome. It was Paul who wrote to the Romans and later
visited Rome, where he died. Paul, by no means, preached to the Gentiles at
Rome what Peter preached twenty-five years before at Jerusalem.

The believing Gentiles at Rome were justified without a cause. They received,
through Paul, what uncircumcised Abraham received without the deeds of the
law: the righteousness of God by faith (Rom. 4:3-11)...

...The true Church of God at Rome in the first century believed in God’s truth in
the Epistle to the Romans—but the Roman Catholic Church has drifted far away
from the gospel of grace contained in that epistle. Well, what has this to do with
Simon Peter?

He has been accused of having something to do with the establishment of the
present Church of Rome. Their claim is that the papal authority has been handed
down from Peter and that the present pope is on St. Peter’s throne by the process
of apostolic succession. There is only one case of apostolic succession in the
Bible: Matthias succeeded Judas (Acts 1:21-26).

Certainly, Peter had no God-given authority over the Gentile churches. Therefore,
it is not scriptural to say that Paul succeeded Peter in authority. But it is scriptural
to say that Paul received from Christ in heaven, a commission, a message, a ministry
that superseded the message and ministry committed unto Peter by Christ.

Paul received his authority from heaven without conferring with those who
were apostles before him (Gal. 1:12,17). Both Peter and Paul had their Christ-given
authority and ministry..." (JC O'Hair)

Full study: Saint Peter And His Keys

--------------

And, precious friend(s), Please Be Very Richly Encouraged and Edified
In The Lord Jesus Christ and In His Precious Word Of Truth, Rightly
Divided:


The Bible: The BIG Picture

Amen.

Study to Be APPROVED Open Bible.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: tourist
Eph 1:22 And hath put all things under his feet, and gave him to be the head over all things to the church.

Col 1:18 And he is the head of the body, the church: who is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead; that in all things he might have the preeminence.

Peter was not the first Pope.

Or anybody after him.

There can only be one head of the Church.

Only one person can represent the Church and that is Christ.

The Pope cannot represent the Church.

And the Pope cannot represent the Church along with Christ.

The Bible says one head.

And the Pope cannot represent Christ taking His place for Christ is in heaven and they are 2 separate persons.

Mat 23:9 And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.

Call no man father who claims to operate in a spiritual capacity.

For only God is our Father.

But they call the Pope Father.

Mat 19:16 And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?

Mat 19:17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.

When a man called Jesus Good Master He said why call me good when only God is good.

Which the man Christ Jesus was giving glory to God that He did good because He is causing Him to do good.

But they call the Pope Holy.

If the Pope was representing Christ on earth he would not accept the title Holy Father.
 
Mat 16:19 I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

Instead of a new power, Peter is given an old responsibility. A better translation is "whatsoever thou shall bind on earth shall have already been bound in heaven"

An example of this can be seen in Acts 15 where the burden placed on gentile believers of the kingdom gospel is that they have the same restrictions placed on the gentile sojourners in the Old Testament
 
Precious friends, just released for your prayerful/Careful consideration; and please
pray for all precious roman catholics, as they also should have/know/believe
God's Precious Word Of Truth, Even as we do, eh?:

"Doubtless you have heard of Saint Peter, but you must not believe all that you have
heard about him. He is not here to defend himself against all these false reports, so
it seems unfair to take advantage of him during his absence. He is still living and he
is coming back to earth someday. Now this is not a false report. This is the truth.

Peter has been accused of being the first pope of Rome....

For anyone who really desires to rid the story of Simon Peter of falsehood
and fiction, there is first-hand information, and it will do your soul good to
get acquainted with this intensely human character—not a myth, but a
real-to-goodness natural man, just like the rest of us, who came in contact
with a Supernatural Power that transformed his life...

...Peter never went to Rome. It was Paul who wrote to the Romans and later
visited Rome, where he died. Paul, by no means, preached to the Gentiles at
Rome what Peter preached twenty-five years before at Jerusalem.

The believing Gentiles at Rome were justified without a cause. They received,
through Paul, what uncircumcised Abraham received without the deeds of the
law: the righteousness of God by faith (Rom. 4:3-11)...

...The true Church of God at Rome in the first century believed in God’s truth in
the Epistle to the Romans—but the Roman Catholic Church has drifted far away
from the gospel of grace contained in that epistle. Well, what has this to do with
Simon Peter?

He has been accused of having something to do with the establishment of the
present Church of Rome. Their claim is that the papal authority has been handed
down from Peter and that the present pope is on St. Peter’s throne by the process
of apostolic succession. There is only one case of apostolic succession in the
Bible: Matthias succeeded Judas (Acts 1:21-26).

Certainly, Peter had no God-given authority over the Gentile churches. Therefore,
it is not scriptural to say that Paul succeeded Peter in authority. But it is scriptural
to say that Paul received from Christ in heaven, a commission, a message, a ministry
that superseded the message and ministry committed unto Peter by Christ.

Paul received his authority from heaven without conferring with those who
were apostles before him (Gal. 1:12,17). Both Peter and Paul had their Christ-given
authority and ministry..." (JC O'Hair)

Full study: Saint Peter And His Keys

--------------

And, precious friend(s), Please Be Very Richly Encouraged and Edified
In The Lord Jesus Christ and In His Precious Word Of Truth, Rightly
Divided:


The Bible: The BIG Picture

Amen.

View attachment 285378
Precious friends, just released for your prayerful/Careful consideration; and please
pray for all precious roman catholics, as they also should have/know/believe
God's Precious Word Of Truth, Even as we do, eh?:

"Doubtless you have heard of Saint Peter, but you must not believe all that you have
heard about him. He is not here to defend himself against all these false reports, so
it seems unfair to take advantage of him during his absence. He is still living and he
is coming back to earth someday. Now this is not a false report. This is the truth.

Peter has been accused of being the first pope of Rome....

For anyone who really desires to rid the story of Simon Peter of falsehood
and fiction, there is first-hand information, and it will do your soul good to
get acquainted with this intensely human character—not a myth, but a
real-to-goodness natural man, just like the rest of us, who came in contact
with a Supernatural Power that transformed his life...

...Peter never went to Rome. It was Paul who wrote to the Romans and later
visited Rome, where he died. Paul, by no means, preached to the Gentiles at
Rome what Peter preached twenty-five years before at Jerusalem.

The believing Gentiles at Rome were justified without a cause. They received,
through Paul, what uncircumcised Abraham received without the deeds of the
law: the righteousness of God by faith (Rom. 4:3-11)...

...The true Church of God at Rome in the first century believed in God’s truth in
the Epistle to the Romans—but the Roman Catholic Church has drifted far away
from the gospel of grace contained in that epistle. Well, what has this to do with
Simon Peter?

He has been accused of having something to do with the establishment of the
present Church of Rome. Their claim is that the papal authority has been handed
down from Peter and that the present pope is on St. Peter’s throne by the process
of apostolic succession. There is only one case of apostolic succession in the
Bible: Matthias succeeded Judas (Acts 1:21-26).

Certainly, Peter had no God-given authority over the Gentile churches. Therefore,
it is not scriptural to say that Paul succeeded Peter in authority. But it is scriptural
to say that Paul received from Christ in heaven, a commission, a message, a ministry
that superseded the message and ministry committed unto Peter by Christ.

Paul received his authority from heaven without conferring with those who
were apostles before him (Gal. 1:12,17). Both Peter and Paul had their Christ-given
authority and ministry..." (JC O'Hair)

Full study: Saint Peter And His Keys

--------------

And, precious friend(s), Please Be Very Richly Encouraged and Edified
In The Lord Jesus Christ and In His Precious Word Of Truth, Rightly
Divided:


The Bible: The BIG Picture

Amen.

View attachment 285378
thanks GRACE ambassador.i found the story really interesting.
 
Precious friends, just released for your prayerful/Careful consideration; and please
pray for all precious roman catholics, as they also should have/know/believe
God's Precious Word Of Truth, Even as we do, eh?:

"Doubtless you have heard of Saint Peter, but you must not believe all that you have
heard about him. He is not here to defend himself against all these false reports, so
it seems unfair to take advantage of him during his absence. He is still living and he
is coming back to earth someday. Now this is not a false report. This is the truth.

Peter has been accused of being the first pope of Rome....

For anyone who really desires to rid the story of Simon Peter of falsehood
and fiction, there is first-hand information, and it will do your soul good to
get acquainted with this intensely human character—not a myth, but a
real-to-goodness natural man, just like the rest of us, who came in contact
with a Supernatural Power that transformed his life...

...Peter never went to Rome. It was Paul who wrote to the Romans and later
visited Rome, where he died. Paul, by no means, preached to the Gentiles at
Rome what Peter preached twenty-five years before at Jerusalem.

The believing Gentiles at Rome were justified without a cause. They received,
through Paul, what uncircumcised Abraham received without the deeds of the
law: the righteousness of God by faith (Rom. 4:3-11)...

...The true Church of God at Rome in the first century believed in God’s truth in
the Epistle to the Romans—but the Roman Catholic Church has drifted far away
from the gospel of grace contained in that epistle. Well, what has this to do with
Simon Peter?

He has been accused of having something to do with the establishment of the
present Church of Rome. Their claim is that the papal authority has been handed
down from Peter and that the present pope is on St. Peter’s throne by the process
of apostolic succession. There is only one case of apostolic succession in the
Bible: Matthias succeeded Judas (Acts 1:21-26).

Certainly, Peter had no God-given authority over the Gentile churches. Therefore,
it is not scriptural to say that Paul succeeded Peter in authority. But it is scriptural
to say that Paul received from Christ in heaven, a commission, a message, a ministry
that superseded the message and ministry committed unto Peter by Christ.

Paul received his authority from heaven without conferring with those who
were apostles before him (Gal. 1:12,17). Both Peter and Paul had their Christ-given
authority and ministry..." (JC O'Hair)

Full study: Saint Peter And His Keys

--------------

And, precious friend(s), Please Be Very Richly Encouraged and Edified
In The Lord Jesus Christ and In His Precious Word Of Truth, Rightly
Divided:


The Bible: The BIG Picture

Amen.

View attachment 285378

it is amazing to me to see, God has not ever gotten taken out of from the truth of his love and mercy given to all through Son Jesus our Savior
Peter of the flesh weak as said to him from Jesus, The Spirit willing yet the flesh weak in that garden, before going to his crucifixion willingly mind you!

Peter, slow to (the unredeemed flesh in the way) the whole truth, Yet God continued to give Peter nothing but the truth from God, who gave Peter three dreams.

Was told when he saw unclean animals come out in his dream. And was told to eat. He would not being under Law, no way. then had another dream the same and still would not eat. then a third one, and still refused, stuck under Law. Hoew many of us all are still stuck as well, even under new man made Laws?

Then he hears from God in that dream say
"Do not call anything unclean, that God has cleaned"
What??????????? I would have thought, but I would've said, being in traditions I have learned from birth forward, no way, I do not understand, anyone else?

Then he is led to the Gentiles to preach truth to them, not him himself, rather Father doing that through him, Luke 21:14-15
He shows up at Cornelius's house. Cornelius answers the door. Peter knows he is led and still does not understand. He frist says, It is illegal for me to enter a Gentile House, yet I know God is leading me. So he enters, God speaks truth through him to the gentiles there.
And they show they heard and believe God speaking through Peter. I mean for Peter to know this, the tongues spoken through them to Peter was Peter's language, as Peter, did not speak the Gentile Language, yet God did through him, The Gentiles heard this without any water Baptism, or any rituals, and were saved by God alone for them. Done! yes water Baptism happened afterwords, yet they were still already saved with out any Water Baptism by God for them. Amazing yes? Thank you Father and Son as Won (One( for us all 1 John 2:1-27
Then Peter afterwords went to the other disciples and told them what happened.
That is when those other disciples questioned and wondered and would not let go of being under Law either.
That is when James and I think John went to Galatia, to spy out this liberty they heard of from Peter. And we see Peter not yet in full assurance afraid he left eating with, excused himself to not eat with the Gentiles, hearing his other brothers James and John were coming
He could not face this, and was afraid. the same as we saw in the day they took Jesus away, and Jesus told him he would deny him, and he did three times, yet still saved by God through it all, can anyone else see this in them too, God's faithfulness?
This be where Paul who was Saul stepped in. Who had been preaching truth about being not under Law any more, Rather to just Love all. John 13:34 and rebuked Peter. Which I bet made Peter angry.
Then we see after growing up into maturity the Epistles Peter wrote who says in 3 Peter at the end to listen to Paul, who is not easy to understand
That was Peter leaving Law behind him, learning to and to stand not afraid anymore

About the Papacy. They use Peter to be in charge to give credit to their views, the self flesh in the way of truth as this world cannot function well without Law

Law is good, if used correctly and only father knows how, time to trust God personally, not self or anyone else thank you