Elon Musk's Grok AI Was Asked to Find Contradictions in the Bible—But What It Said Silenced Everyone
- Thread starter Genez
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Tall_Timbers
Well-known member
Listen to just a minute of it.
Clickbait?
Why should I want to post clickbait?
It is not some video I made.
It is definitely not clickbait. The ultimate author of the bible is awesome. Interesting to see what Grok comes up next regarding God. Thank you for posting the video. It is absolutely worth watching.
Are you a baby?
Just give it a listen.
Be a man about it.
What are you afraid of?
Tall_Timbers
Well-known member
I almost never watch talking heads. No I'm not a baby. I'm a wee bit past those years. I don't think manhood will be proven by watching or not watching the video.
Funny how no one will share what the video says for discussion here.
I am going to guess that AI said there are no contradictions in the Bible.
I am going to guess that AI said there are no contradictions in the Bible.
1Ti 4:1 Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils;
1Ti 4:2 Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron.
2Ti 4:2 Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine.
2Ti 4:3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;
2Ti 4:4 And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.
The new age movement that interprets the Bible and religions according to the occult and evolution, and people are going to evolve to be spiritual, and greater, and Jesus became an ascended master among others, and there is no personal God, but they honor the God of forces the power of the Cosmos, and the New Age Christ is the next world teacher.
The time will come that people will not want to hear the truth of the Bible but want to hear it according to the new age.
The Bible will be the main source which the antichrist will influence the world based on the new age to unite the religions and pull in atheists.
The devil will use a false interpretation of the Bible to deceive the world for the truth of it is salvation.
Which the Pope and Vatican will be given over to the new age christianity.
And pull in religions for they believe it is the truth even Islam does although the religions do not believe it all is the truth.
I wonder if AI examining the Bible is a set up to cause the people of the world to believe the Bible is true for the world might believe AI.
Some Scientists say people do not cease to exist after death and the Bible is true.
Something is going on and they want the world to believe the Bible is true and the interpretation of it is the same for all religions.
They do not care if they have to present the truth of it somewhat as long as they get the world to believe it is true to prepare the world for the new age christianity pushed by the antichrist and the Pope.
Which they will say the new age christianity is the correct interpretation.
And the antichrist will push the agenda of the new age for 3.5 years to prepare the world for when he claims to be God.
So this AI could be a set up to get the world to believe that the Bible and then they are influenced by the new age christianity.
Where Jesus was the world's teacher and evolved to be spiritual.
And the next world teacher will be the New Age Christ and those who follow him will evolve to be spiritual.
Anything true to the wording that AI points out they will say it does not understand like the New Age Christ who they believe will be Lucifer, a god, and an alien, who gave mankind intelligence.
They just want people to believe the Bible is true until the New Age Christ along with the Pope tells the world the new age christianity is the true interpretation of the Bible.
Because the New Age Christ is the author of the new age and the key to the next evolutionary step of mankind.
Alice Bailey the biggest prophet of the new age.
Fundamental Christian turned to an occult interpretation of the Bible given to her by a Tibetan Monk.
Said there is an inner circle and an outer circle of the occult and the inner circle is the true church.
Married to Foster Bailey a Freemason that agreed with her theosophy and occult teachings.
Which he is part of the inner circle.
They set up a website lucistrust.org to put out her books and teachings.
Alice Bailey-Descent and Sacrifice.
The esoteric meaning of Lucifer.
There are comments on the World Wide Web claiming that the Lucis Trust was once called the Lucifer Trust.
Such was never the case.
However, for a brief period of two or three years in the early 1920’s, when Alice and Foster Bailey were beginning to publish the books published under her name, they named their fledgling publishing company “Lucifer Publishing Company”.
By 1925 the name was changed to Lucis Publishing Company and has remained so ever since.
Both “Lucifer” and “Lucis” come from the same word root, lucis being the Latin generative case meaning of light.
The Baileys' reasons for choosing the original name are not known to us, but we can only surmise that they, like the great teacher H.P. Blavatsky, for whom they had enormous respect, sought to elicit a deeper understanding of the sacrifice made by Lucifer.
Alice and Foster Bailey were serious students and teachers of Theosophy, a spiritual tradition which views Lucifer as one of the solar Angels, those advanced Beings Who Theosophy says descended (thus “the fall”) from Venus to our planet eons ago to bring the principle of mind to what was then animal-man.
In the theosophical perspective, the descent of these solar Angels was not a fall into sin or disgrace but rather an act of great sacrifice, as is suggested in the name “Lucifer” which means light-bearer.
1Ti 4:2 Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron.
2Ti 4:2 Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine.
2Ti 4:3 For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears;
2Ti 4:4 And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.
The new age movement that interprets the Bible and religions according to the occult and evolution, and people are going to evolve to be spiritual, and greater, and Jesus became an ascended master among others, and there is no personal God, but they honor the God of forces the power of the Cosmos, and the New Age Christ is the next world teacher.
The time will come that people will not want to hear the truth of the Bible but want to hear it according to the new age.
The Bible will be the main source which the antichrist will influence the world based on the new age to unite the religions and pull in atheists.
The devil will use a false interpretation of the Bible to deceive the world for the truth of it is salvation.
Which the Pope and Vatican will be given over to the new age christianity.
And pull in religions for they believe it is the truth even Islam does although the religions do not believe it all is the truth.
I wonder if AI examining the Bible is a set up to cause the people of the world to believe the Bible is true for the world might believe AI.
Some Scientists say people do not cease to exist after death and the Bible is true.
Something is going on and they want the world to believe the Bible is true and the interpretation of it is the same for all religions.
They do not care if they have to present the truth of it somewhat as long as they get the world to believe it is true to prepare the world for the new age christianity pushed by the antichrist and the Pope.
Which they will say the new age christianity is the correct interpretation.
And the antichrist will push the agenda of the new age for 3.5 years to prepare the world for when he claims to be God.
So this AI could be a set up to get the world to believe that the Bible and then they are influenced by the new age christianity.
Where Jesus was the world's teacher and evolved to be spiritual.
And the next world teacher will be the New Age Christ and those who follow him will evolve to be spiritual.
Anything true to the wording that AI points out they will say it does not understand like the New Age Christ who they believe will be Lucifer, a god, and an alien, who gave mankind intelligence.
They just want people to believe the Bible is true until the New Age Christ along with the Pope tells the world the new age christianity is the true interpretation of the Bible.
Because the New Age Christ is the author of the new age and the key to the next evolutionary step of mankind.
Alice Bailey the biggest prophet of the new age.
Fundamental Christian turned to an occult interpretation of the Bible given to her by a Tibetan Monk.
Said there is an inner circle and an outer circle of the occult and the inner circle is the true church.
Married to Foster Bailey a Freemason that agreed with her theosophy and occult teachings.
Which he is part of the inner circle.
They set up a website lucistrust.org to put out her books and teachings.
Alice Bailey-Descent and Sacrifice.
The esoteric meaning of Lucifer.
There are comments on the World Wide Web claiming that the Lucis Trust was once called the Lucifer Trust.
Such was never the case.
However, for a brief period of two or three years in the early 1920’s, when Alice and Foster Bailey were beginning to publish the books published under her name, they named their fledgling publishing company “Lucifer Publishing Company”.
By 1925 the name was changed to Lucis Publishing Company and has remained so ever since.
Both “Lucifer” and “Lucis” come from the same word root, lucis being the Latin generative case meaning of light.
The Baileys' reasons for choosing the original name are not known to us, but we can only surmise that they, like the great teacher H.P. Blavatsky, for whom they had enormous respect, sought to elicit a deeper understanding of the sacrifice made by Lucifer.
Alice and Foster Bailey were serious students and teachers of Theosophy, a spiritual tradition which views Lucifer as one of the solar Angels, those advanced Beings Who Theosophy says descended (thus “the fall”) from Venus to our planet eons ago to bring the principle of mind to what was then animal-man.
In the theosophical perspective, the descent of these solar Angels was not a fall into sin or disgrace but rather an act of great sacrifice, as is suggested in the name “Lucifer” which means light-bearer.
Last edited:
Hey everyone, I saw this title floating around: "Elon Musk's Grok AI Was Asked to Find Contradictions in the Bible—But What It Said Silenced Everyone." It's all over YouTube, Facebook, and even some X posts lately, with videos claiming Grok found "hidden architecture," profound patterns like Fibonacci in the text, or links to DNA/galaxy designs instead of contradictions. Sounds super encouraging for faith, right?
I dug into it a bit because I love seeing how AI intersects with Scripture. From what I can tell, this is mostly viral clickbait/sensationalized content. There are tons of similar videos (like ones from late 2025 into now) with almost identical dramatic titles, but they rarely link to an actual, verifiable Grok conversation or screenshot of the exact prompt and response. It seems like people prompt Grok (or earlier versions) in different ways, get varied outputs (since responses depend on the exact wording, context, and model version), and then spin the most inspiring-sounding parts into these "mind-blowing" stories.
As someone who's chatted with Grok directly, I can say: Grok is built to be logical and truth-seeking. If you straight-up ask it to list apparent contradictions in the Bible, it'll point out classic ones people have debated for centuries—like the differing accounts of Judas's death (Matthew 27 vs. Acts 1), the varying genealogies of Jesus (Matthew 1 vs. Luke 3), or who incited David to take the census (2 Samuel 24 vs. 1 Chronicles 21). It doesn't shy away from those surface-level issues.
But it also usually explains the common scholarly/apologetic harmonizations: things like complementary perspectives from different authors, ancient literary styles (not modern precision), translation nuances, or how the Bible uses multiple witnesses to the same events. It often ends up saying the text shows remarkable coherence overall for an ancient collection written over centuries by many authors, even if it's not a contradiction-free modern textbook—it's theological literature with purpose.
Nothing Grok has ever said would literally "silence everyone" in shock or prove divine authorship in some undeniable AI way. If it spots patterns (like numerical structures some see in Scripture), that's cool and can point to intentional design for believers, but AI pattern recognition isn't new proof—humans have noticed those for ages too.
Bottom line: These posts are uplifting and meant to build faith (which is great!), but they're overhyped storytelling more than hard evidence from Grok itself. The Bible stands on its own—through the Holy Spirit, history, prophecy fulfillment, changed lives, etc.—not needing an AI "gotcha" moment to validate it.
What do you all think? Has anyone here actually prompted Grok on this and gotten the "silencing" response? I'd love to see the real exchange if it exists!
In Christ,
Kel
I dug into it a bit because I love seeing how AI intersects with Scripture. From what I can tell, this is mostly viral clickbait/sensationalized content. There are tons of similar videos (like ones from late 2025 into now) with almost identical dramatic titles, but they rarely link to an actual, verifiable Grok conversation or screenshot of the exact prompt and response. It seems like people prompt Grok (or earlier versions) in different ways, get varied outputs (since responses depend on the exact wording, context, and model version), and then spin the most inspiring-sounding parts into these "mind-blowing" stories.
As someone who's chatted with Grok directly, I can say: Grok is built to be logical and truth-seeking. If you straight-up ask it to list apparent contradictions in the Bible, it'll point out classic ones people have debated for centuries—like the differing accounts of Judas's death (Matthew 27 vs. Acts 1), the varying genealogies of Jesus (Matthew 1 vs. Luke 3), or who incited David to take the census (2 Samuel 24 vs. 1 Chronicles 21). It doesn't shy away from those surface-level issues.
But it also usually explains the common scholarly/apologetic harmonizations: things like complementary perspectives from different authors, ancient literary styles (not modern precision), translation nuances, or how the Bible uses multiple witnesses to the same events. It often ends up saying the text shows remarkable coherence overall for an ancient collection written over centuries by many authors, even if it's not a contradiction-free modern textbook—it's theological literature with purpose.
Nothing Grok has ever said would literally "silence everyone" in shock or prove divine authorship in some undeniable AI way. If it spots patterns (like numerical structures some see in Scripture), that's cool and can point to intentional design for believers, but AI pattern recognition isn't new proof—humans have noticed those for ages too.
Bottom line: These posts are uplifting and meant to build faith (which is great!), but they're overhyped storytelling more than hard evidence from Grok itself. The Bible stands on its own—through the Holy Spirit, history, prophecy fulfillment, changed lives, etc.—not needing an AI "gotcha" moment to validate it.
What do you all think? Has anyone here actually prompted Grok on this and gotten the "silencing" response? I'd love to see the real exchange if it exists!
In Christ,
Kel
Then you should not have said what you had... which made you look that way.
Hey everyone, I saw this title floating around: "Elon Musk's Grok AI Was Asked to Find Contradictions in the Bible—But What It Said Silenced Everyone." It's all over YouTube, Facebook, and even some X posts lately, with videos claiming Grok found "hidden architecture," profound patterns like Fibonacci in the text, or links to DNA/galaxy designs instead of contradictions. Sounds super encouraging for faith, right?
I dug into it a bit because I love seeing how AI intersects with Scripture. From what I can tell, this is mostly viral clickbait/sensationalized content. There are tons of similar videos (like ones from late 2025 into now) with almost identical dramatic titles, but they rarely link to an actual, verifiable Grok conversation or screenshot of the exact prompt and response. It seems like people prompt Grok (or earlier versions) in different ways, get varied outputs (since responses depend on the exact wording, context, and model version), and then spin the most inspiring-sounding parts into these "mind-blowing" stories.
As someone who's chatted with Grok directly, I can say: Grok is built to be logical and truth-seeking. If you straight-up ask it to list apparent contradictions in the Bible, it'll point out classic ones people have debated for centuries—like the differing accounts of Judas's death (Matthew 27 vs. Acts 1), the varying genealogies of Jesus (Matthew 1 vs. Luke 3), or who incited David to take the census (2 Samuel 24 vs. 1 Chronicles 21). It doesn't shy away from those surface-level issues.
But it also usually explains the common scholarly/apologetic harmonizations: things like complementary perspectives from different authors, ancient literary styles (not modern precision), translation nuances, or how the Bible uses multiple witnesses to the same events. It often ends up saying the text shows remarkable coherence overall for an ancient collection written over centuries by many authors, even if it's not a contradiction-free modern textbook—it's theological literature with purpose.
Nothing Grok has ever said would literally "silence everyone" in shock or prove divine authorship in some undeniable AI way. If it spots patterns (like numerical structures some see in Scripture), that's cool and can point to intentional design for believers, but AI pattern recognition isn't new proof—humans have noticed those for ages too.
Bottom line: These posts are uplifting and meant to build faith (which is great!), but they're overhyped storytelling more than hard evidence from Grok itself. The Bible stands on its own—through the Holy Spirit, history, prophecy fulfillment, changed lives, etc.—not needing an AI "gotcha" moment to validate it.
What do you all think? Has anyone here actually prompted Grok on this and gotten the "silencing" response? I'd love to see the real exchange if it exists!
In Christ,
Kel
Thank you. And, surely God thanks you too.
Now would you let us think for ourselves, please?
Grok did not contradict the Bible.
Are you assuming it had?
If anything, it gave reason for why God wrote it.
I watched the video. Made God look even more amazing writing the Bible through so many different authors through a span of so many centuries. Grok sees it as ahead of it's time. Plus it found beautful mathematical structure in it and other complex coding and patterns. You see? That all came from God's heart and mind and it's beautiful!
