John 3:18
King James Version
18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
Is simply believing in Jesus (like that he is a person and that he exists) enough to be saved considering what he says here in John 3:18? He says those who believe not are condemned already because they have not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. If you only must know his name then I think what Jesus might be saying here is that you must simply believe in him, if you follow my logic. It's just that for Jesus to say that those who believe not are condemned because they have not believed in his name seems to take all requisites for salvation away from the believing part, as many like to say you must believe the gospel and etc. when it might be the truth you simply have to believe in Jesus as a person. I'm interested in what other people have to say about this part of the Bible (namely John 3 and John 3:18) as it interests me how people can come to different views of salvation and what is truly required.
Just to flesh out what I'm talking about if it's not clear. Jesus is saying if you believe in him you are saved, but those who don't believe are condemned already because they have not believed in his name (like literally that he has a name and that it's Jesus). This seems like a sort of poetic way of putting that if you don't believe in him you won't be saved since the bar is so low here that people will be condemned for simply not having believed in his name. I think I'm getting this right but I know there is another view that Jesus means his fame or reputation when he says name, but it confuses me why he would use such a derelict term when he was talking about something so important. Like most people would not know that if I'm not mistaken.
Anyways, hopefully what I wrote was understandable. Really really sorry if it wasn't.
King James Version
18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
Is simply believing in Jesus (like that he is a person and that he exists) enough to be saved considering what he says here in John 3:18? He says those who believe not are condemned already because they have not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. If you only must know his name then I think what Jesus might be saying here is that you must simply believe in him, if you follow my logic. It's just that for Jesus to say that those who believe not are condemned because they have not believed in his name seems to take all requisites for salvation away from the believing part, as many like to say you must believe the gospel and etc. when it might be the truth you simply have to believe in Jesus as a person. I'm interested in what other people have to say about this part of the Bible (namely John 3 and John 3:18) as it interests me how people can come to different views of salvation and what is truly required.
Just to flesh out what I'm talking about if it's not clear. Jesus is saying if you believe in him you are saved, but those who don't believe are condemned already because they have not believed in his name (like literally that he has a name and that it's Jesus). This seems like a sort of poetic way of putting that if you don't believe in him you won't be saved since the bar is so low here that people will be condemned for simply not having believed in his name. I think I'm getting this right but I know there is another view that Jesus means his fame or reputation when he says name, but it confuses me why he would use such a derelict term when he was talking about something so important. Like most people would not know that if I'm not mistaken.
Anyways, hopefully what I wrote was understandable. Really really sorry if it wasn't.