Protesters Harass Feds in Minneapolis

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
So you quote Ephesians to "have no fellowship with them" and twist that to "correct them".

You describe challenging false doctrine, and yet no one has any issue with that. My issue was your accusation that he was one with the devil. Where does the Bible say we should accuse brothers and sisters of being one with the devil?

Galatians 5:15 But if ye bite and devour one another, take heed that ye be not consumed one of another.
And you think the works of darkness should not be corrected
You respond to my post in which I said "no one has any issue with challenging false doctrine" with what you wrote here that "I think the works of darkness should not be corrected". This proves you are deceitful and do not cut straight the word of God.

and nobody should correct those walking in darkness.

Of course not. That is why I quoted Galatians 5:15 to you and now I am quoting Luke 6:41, also for your correction.

Luke 6:41 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but perceivest not the beam that is in thine own eye?
 
This proves you are deceitful and do not cut straight the word of God.

Those peddling unfounded conspiracy theories are deceitful and ignorant of the word of God




Of course not. That is why I quoted Galatians 5:15 to you and now I am quoting Luke 6:41, also for your correction.

Luke 6:41 And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but perceivest not the beam that is in thine own eye?

What you missed is Jesus said the tares are children of the devil.

Meaning they aren't children of God.
 
Is Baptism part of salvation?

Acts 8:14 Now when the apostles which were at Jerusalem heard that Samaria had received the word of God, they sent unto them Peter and John: 15 Who, when they were come down, prayed for them, that they might receive the Holy Ghost: 16 (For as yet he was fallen upon none of them: only they were baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus.) 17 Then laid they their hands on them, and they received the Holy Ghost. 18 And when Simon saw that through laying on of the apostles' hands the Holy Ghost was given, he offered them money, 19 Saying, Give me also this power, that on whomsoever I lay hands, he may receive the Holy Ghost. 20 But Peter said unto him, Thy money perish with thee, because thou hast thought that the gift of God may be purchased with money. 21 Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter: for thy heart is not right in the sight of God. 22 Repent therefore of this thy wickedness, and pray God, if perhaps the thought of thine heart may be forgiven thee. 23 For I perceive that thou art in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity. 24 Then answered Simon, and said, Pray ye to the Lord for me, that none of these things which ye have spoken come upon me.

This is a fascinating paragraph and it destroys one part of the doctrine of "Once Saved Always Saved" where they teach that baptism is not part of salvation and to say so is to teach a works based salvation. We are not saved by works, that is true. But just like a fruit tree bears fruit, if you are truly saved you will bear the fruit of the Spirit, which are works of faith and labor of love. To receive the word of God, is what they equate with salvation. That would be Jesus coming into your heart as a result of His sacrifice on calvary to forgive you of your sins. But if that is true, if the Lord has truly come into your heart and you have confessed of your sins, then surely you will repent of those sins. What are those sins? Well at the most fundamental level sin is ignoring the command of God and doing what is right in your own eyes. The Bible says "believe and be baptized". Simple command, you don't have to understand it, simply obey it. However, in this case we learn that they have believed, they have been baptized and yet the Holy Spirit has not fallen on them. Why not? First Jesus Christ enters your heart, once you have confessed and repented of your sins (believed and been baptized) you can be clothed with the Holy Spirit like a policeman wearing a uniform is clothed. However, this did not happen yet because the apostles have not yet sanctioned this. When they laid hands on them that was the apostles sanctioning the gospel going to the Samaritans. To be clothed with the Holy Spirit is a sign of authority to the angels and they would not recognize this authority until the apostles laid hands on them. But now this brings us to Simon. There are two things that can separate us from God just like a wire can be broken and prevent the electricity from flowing. One is bitterness and the other is iniquity. If you are nursing bitterness in your heart or you are living in iniquity you will be cut off from the Holy Spirit. The "Once Saved Always Saved" doctrine never teaches this. Peter realized this was the case with Simon because he wanted to purchase the authority of the Holy Spirit with money. We see this with the "OSAS" crowd. These churches are often the best funded, FreeMasons will often be on the board of directors, they will have a large, brand new building, a good sound system, a TV ministry, etc. Consider TPUSA, they receive millions and millions in donations. They think give them more money and they will have more power. Their heart is not right and as a result their power has gone from millions listening to Charlie to thousands listening to those who have taken his place at TPUSA. The power the ministry has is 0.1%. of what it was. Now it could be the gall of bitterness or it could be the bondage of iniquity, but something is not right.

25 And they, when they had testified and preached the word of the Lord, returned to Jerusalem, and preached the gospel in many villages of the Samaritans. 26 And the angel of the Lord spake unto Philip, saying, Arise, and go toward the south unto the way that goeth down from Jerusalem unto Gaza, which is desert.

This is ironic. One theory is that Charlie Kirk was assassinated because he was not going to publicly support the war in Gaza because he was accusing the Jewish leaders of sin. That was good news to those living in Gaza. Stephen is killed because he accused the Jewish leaders of sins and who picks up the banner to take the gospel to Gaza but Philip. Likewise Charlie is killed and who picks up the banner but Candace who also accuses the Jewish leaders of sin and takes the gospel to Gaza.

27 And he arose and went: and, behold, a man of Ethiopia, an eunuch of great authority under Candace queen of the Ethiopians, who had the charge of all her treasure, and had come to Jerusalem for to worship, 28 Was returning, and sitting in his chariot read Esaias the prophet.

Ironic, isn't it.

29 Then the Spirit said unto Philip, Go near, and join thyself to this chariot. 30 And Philip ran thither to him, and heard him read the prophet Esaias, and said, Understandest thou what thou readest? 31 And he said, How can I, except some man should guide me? And he desired Philip that he would come up and sit with him.

The whole world can see what happened with Charlie and many are trying to figure out what it means.

32 The place of the scripture which he read was this, He was led as a sheep to the slaughter; and like a lamb dumb before his shearer, so opened he not his mouth: 33 In his humiliation his judgment was taken away: and who shall declare his generation? for his life is taken from the earth.

Sure sounds like what happened to Charlie.

34 And the eunuch answered Philip, and said, I pray thee, of whom speaketh the prophet this? of himself, or of some other man? 35 Then Philip opened his mouth, and began at the same scripture, and preached unto him Jesus.

Charlie Kirk was preaching Jesus at the end of his ministry and that played a major role in his being killed. Now Candace is preaching Jesus in her podcast. It is the major reason why she was fired from the Daily Wire.

36 And as they went on their way, they came unto a certain water: and the eunuch said, See, here is water; what doth hinder me to be baptized?

Again, OSAS is seen to be an idiotic doctrine. This man understood from the gospel that it was important for him to make a public confession of his faith. Think of baptism as an engagement ring. You don't get engaged by putting on a ring, but if you are engaged then the ring becomes a sign to all. We live in an evil and adulterous age. I was in college when I got baptized. I had been listening to a man come to my room preaching the gospel for months. One night I walked into my dorm room and there were about ten people or more sitting around. My hair was wet and someone asked what happened? I said I had gotten baptized. I could see immediately the entire atmosphere in the room changed. The person who asked that was a Baptist and yet he asked "why did you do that?" The evil adulterous age doesn't have a problem with someone preaching the gospel, they will mock and ridicule, it is "good fun". But go and get baptized, that they understand.

37 And Philip said, If thou believest with all thine heart, thou mayest. And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God. 38 And he commanded the chariot to stand still: and they went down both into the water, both Philip and the eunuch; and he baptized him.

There is only one requirement to being baptized, believe with all your heart that Jesus Christ is the Son of God.

39 And when they were come up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord caught away Philip, that the eunuch saw him no more: and he went on his way rejoicing.

This is a blog about the rapture and this word "caught away" is the word we identify as referring to the rapture. The apostasy leads people astray concerning salvation. They do this by speaking the truth, but although what they say is "true" it is also incomplete. If you are engaged to the Lord, if you truly are saved, then why aren't you wearing an engagement ring? He said to "believe and be baptized". So why do you teach you don't have to be baptized?

40 But Philip was found at Azotus: and passing through he preached in all the cities, till he came to Caesarea.
 

Civil War Just ERUPTED in Minnesota... as Tim Walz Tells Mobs "KEEP GOING"
 
I do not understand this mentality.
This hatred of ice has gone on for as long as Minnesota has been a state. If you salt the roads then that harms the land, also it is hard on dogs. What you have to understand is that it is a constant battle every single winter, and after ten, twenty, thirty years some of these people have had it. If you can't afford to go to Florida for the winter, what do you do? So I hope this helps you understand their mentality and hatred towards ice. Actually it is a love / hate relationship because I think Herb Brooks is also from Minnesota.
 
This is a disturbing clip of Donald addressing the top military brass not that long ago. He says he wants to use US cities as training grounds to combat the "enemy within": "It's really a very important mission and I told Pete we should use some of these dangerous cities as training grounds for our military, national guard, but military."

He's drunk on power. He wants to invoke the insurrection act so he can deploy the military on the streets of US cities. This has been his plan all along. I don't think he even really believes there's an enemy within. He only know his delusional base thinks there is, and as long as they believe it he can use that to keep gaining more power. Kamala warned us; she was right about everything.


 
Eeek! I'm a heretic ? o_O
lol!! There’s heresy, and there’s heretics.

I don’t think everyone who is in the “you can lose your Salvation” crowd is a heretic.
Sorry for saying that.

That one dude clearly relies on his works to stay saved.

Lord knows I was deeeep in that doctrine for years before, I believe, the Holy Spirit led me out.

Hopelessly we’ll get there yet young lady!:D:D
 
  • Like
Reactions: mailmandan and gb9
Ananias ushers in the ministry for both Peter and Paul

Acts 9:17 And Ananias went his way, and entered into the house; and putting his hands on him said, Brother Saul, the Lord, even Jesus, that appeared unto thee in the way as thou camest, hath sent me, that thou mightest receive thy sight, and be filled with the Holy Ghost.

Why is this brother named Ananias? That is the same name as the guy who lied to the Holy Spirit saying he was absolute for the Lord when in reality he was keeping part of the offering to himself? This is the mirror image of that Ananias, only this one is absolute. When the Lord calls, he is available. When the Lord sends him on a suicide mission, he goes. Earlier in Acts we see what happens if you are not absolute for the Lord and pretend you are. Here we see what happens when you truly are absolute for the Lord. The message to Paul is that he will have to be absolute to the Lord and that message can only be delivered by someone who is absolute for the Lord. In both cases Ananias was the one who ushered in the ministry of Peter and Paul, the two witnesses. In Peter's case he recognized someone who was lying to the holy Spirit because he had been that person. He had boasted that if all else abandoned the Lord he wouldn't. He knew the penalty for that was death. It was Dorcas being raised from the dead that caused him to also see that he died with Christ and also rose with Him. But Paul is different, he was absolute, his problem was that he was blind, he was walking in darkness. Before he thought he needed to cause Christians a lot of suffering in order to be absolute in his service to God. Now the Lord is going to show him that he will need to go through that suffering in order to be absolute in his service to Jesus.

18 And immediately there fell from his eyes as it had been scales: and he received sight forthwith, and arose, and was baptized.

Do you know that there are Christians who teach you do not need to be baptized for salvation? This is truly idiotic. The minute Paul was no longer blind he got baptized. Why? Because the Lord said to "believe and be baptized". Salvation means we no longer do what is right in our own eyes but we are obedient to Jesus Christ who is the Lord.
 
I don’t think everyone who is in the “you can lose your Salvation” crowd is a heretic.
Sorry for saying that.
I agree. NOSAS only becomes heresy when you attach salvation by works/salvation maintained by works to it just like OSAS only becomes heresy when you attach a license to sin/license for immortality to it.
 
America Won't Recover From This...

False!

More unfounded conspiracy theories and this is not a civil war.



use US cities as training grounds to combat the "enemy within"

Speaking of the baby killing liberal perverts who have been working for decades to destabilize the US as the seek to use socialism as a stepping stone in to making the US a communist state.



He's drunk on power.

Liberals are drunk with their desire to destroy the US Constitution and make the US a communist state.
 
False!

More unfounded conspiracy theories and this is not a civil war.
I have reported you for being deceitful and deceptive. I did not say that. You typed that in and ascribed that to me. It was said in the link I posted, but not by me. You are a deceitful person, falsifying your posts. This is what liars do.
 
I have reported you for being deceitful and deceptive. I did not say that.

You are posting videos that you apparently are in agreement with.

If you are not in agreement with the content of a video you post, why would you post the video??? clueless.gif



You are a deceitful person, falsifying your posts. This is what liars do.

Spreading unfounded conspiracy theories is what liars and deceivers do
 
You are posting videos that you apparently are in agreement with.

You can respond to the post, that will show that I posted the link and you can say whatever you want in response. But when you intentionally erase what is there and type in something that you wrote and pass it off as a direct verbatim quote from me, that is false, it is misleading, it is deceitful and it is despicable. You are a liar.

If you are not in agreement with the content of a video you post, why would you post the video??? View attachment 284549





Spreading unfounded conspiracy theories is what liars and deceivers do

I post this as a journal of what other people are saying and reporting at this very instance so you can see what is going on and as a record of how people are responding.

Why does a newspaper have "an editorial page"? It is because they can post the news without it being seen as something they wrote whereas the editorial page is what they wrote. I have many editorial comments throughout all my posts. Respond to something that I said, or respond to what someone else said in a link I shared. But for you to claim that I said that is deceitful.

Your post was a lie. You are a liar.
 
Said the conspiracy theorist who posts lies all day long! View attachment 284550

Dude you should look in to getting in to comedy!





That's rich coming from someone who specializes in lying :rolleyes:
I went to you according to Matthew 18 and showed you your fault. You refuse to listen. I have reported this as well.
 
The shooter wasn't run over. She didn't try to run him over. He reached out himself and touched her car. He could clearly see she was turning her wheels away from him and was about to leave. He shot her because he didn't want her to leave, not because he was in danger.

 
She didn't try to run him over. He reached out himself and touched her car. He could clearly see she was turning her wheels away from him and was about to leave. He shot her because he didn't want her to leave, not because he was in danger.

Agree to disagree.

I also saw the video from his perspective. When she gunned it, at that moment I thought she was trying to run him over. My opinion is that when she saw the gun she turned the wheel but that was the same moment he shot.

In my opinion the confusion over whether or not she was trying to run him over is on her. If she had obeyed their orders she would still be alive. I agree with her ex, she made foolish decisions.

Also it is a ridiculous and idiotic thing to say "he wasn't run over". That cannot be the criteria that allows a cop to shoot. What you can only defend yourself after the car has run you over? That is moronic.
 
Everyone's making the same mistake because their watching the video and following along frame by frame looking at what the commentators are showing them. The agent not only recorded the license plate when at the back of the vehicle he filmed something else and didn't realize he did it. No one sees it because they watch the video with the volume on, turn it off and watch it and see what you see.