Did Jesus Shed His Blood For Retained Sins (Unremitted Sins)?
- Thread starter Solitude
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
100% is both of us who voted; the rest of you don't count.
Yours don't count either, you hypocrite.
There are no sin(s) Jesus did not go to that cross for willingly. None,
He took all sin away John 1:29, stated he did this John 19:30, Father approved in Jesus being raised from the dead, to never die any more ever. It is finished under Law to now uphold Law as good for me at least to stand in thankfulness to God for it. As I do this between Father, Son and me as Won (One) for me. I can only speak for me, as God has told and tells all others the truth in God's Spirit and Truth, the only way to see, and be made new from Father to you, John 4:23-24 again at least for me.
Now about Blasphemy of the Holy Spirit. Since Christ is risen and took all sin away for everyone, that got done one time for all. No more coming back to die anymore, it is done, where new life gets given to anyone that decides to believe God in risen Son for them too.
Blasphemy is not yet decided in a person, until. When one decides to not believe God in risen Son for them to be new by this done work for them to love all in the same mercy and truth given through Son, these are aware of this decision, then Blasphemy is not forgiven, when physically die in unbelief consciously, What?
We are left with one choice left after the death first took away all sin in Father's sight, not this world's sight at all. Daddy's sight for us to be born new by Father through the resurrected Christ given to us to abide in love and mercy to all, no longer a few, thank you Lord
Thank you Jesus for not wasting your precious blood on unremiited sin.
Why not?
Rom 5:20
Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:
Paul does not say "But where sin abounded, grace abounded less, since Jesus only died for the sins of the repentant."
Rom 5:15
But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many.
How many humans have died brcause of Adam's sin? All.
So, for how many was the gift of justification by grace through Jesus abounded?
It is possible for me graciously to buy tickets for all my family members to fly to Italy, but yet for some to choose not to avail themselves of those tickets. It would not be gracious of me to kidnap them and force them to go to Italy because I have paid for them to go.
Perhaps Jesus did enough to cover the cost of all sins, but some refuse to accept His grace, and so do not walk into the redemption the has purchased for them.
Is it reasonable to insist that all the sins for which Jesus died must be forgiven by Jesus? It does not seem reasonable to me.
Jesus said that the Father has given over all judgment to the Son.
Jhn 5:22
For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son:
How can Jesus have bought sinners who have as yet unremitted sins, so that He not the Father will judge them, if He did not pay for those unremitted sins with His blood. Otherwise, those with unremitted sins would remain under the Father's judgment, and the Father would not have handed over all judgment to the Son.
There isn't any more grace for those whose sins aren't ultimately remitted. THEY WENT TO HELL!
If Jesus did not consider it a waste of spikenard, but considered it an expression of love, for the woman to anoint Him for burial, why would Jesus consider it a waste to shed His blood for those He loves who nevertheless reject His sacrifice.?Thank you Jesus for not wasting your precious blood on unremiited sin.
Those in Hell, chose themselves to be there\
God loved loves us all by Son for all. We make the choice each person. I do not care waht others are doing are not doing, since after the cross no flesh will ever please God anymore ever Romans 8:1-3
So believe to see new in Father's Spirit and Truth, thank you
Whoever is in Hell, chose willingly to be there period Psalm 82
Thank you Jesus for not wasting your precious blood on unremiited sin.
He took it all upon himself once for us all. Left for anyone to choose to believe God in risen Son or not consciously so
Then one can stand humbly so, and not fight in the flesh anymore, thank you Father for the rest
Hebrews 4:9-13
I believe He would have HAD to have shed his blood for unremitted sin because he said it is finished.
Jesus only shed his blood for the elect. The rest are never saved. Hell is clear proof of this.
