If Paul, who stood Peter face to face to correct him (
Galatians 2:11) , had to get Peter's approval to accept his writings, why did Peter, in
2 Peter 3:16, say that what Paul wrote was " hard to be understood, "? Paul had a greater spiritual understanding of the totality of scripture after spending three years in Arabia and Damascus, being taught by Jesus ( have I not seen the Lord,
1Corinthians 9:1) and/or the Holy Spirit, THEN going to Jerusalem and meeting the other Apostles. BTW, Christianity is NOT A RELIGION. " Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father IS THIS, To visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world."
James 1:27 Anything offered, other than that, as religion, is defiled and impure before God. Religion or religious is only mentioned about 5 times in scripture. So it seems that God doesn't put the importance in religion as men do, if He did I believe He would have included it in His Word much more than 5 times. If you didn't notice religion is works, good works that we should do, but works nonetheless. " Not of works, lest any man should boast."
Ephesians 2:9