First good job with replying and not getting everything mixed up.
Romans, 10:1 starts out this way.
Romans 10:1 Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved.
The reason Paul didn't mention baptism is because he is speaking to the church he started, NOT THE UNSAVED.
In 10:9 he is tells those who are saved to get out and confess JESUS or they will lose their salvation, as you shared
Notice just down a little more,
14 How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?
15 And how shall they preach, except they be sent? as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things!
Being filled with the Holy Ghost didn't start until JESUS ascended the second time, if GOD was going to fill someone with the Holy Ghost Abraham sure would have been on the top of the list.
No debate, we are saved by grace not by works.
JESUS SAID IN,
John 3:5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
Why do you think JESUS said we have to be born of WATER and of SPIRIT TO ENTER?
Being baptized in a commandment not works.
When a person is baptized who is doing the work anyway?
The one walking into the water? Or the one doing HIS will and baptizing you?
Do you understand that Paul was born of water and of spirit and speaks to his churches about both and the importance of it?
If Paul was speaking to you today, don't you think he would ask you like I did, HAVE YOU received the Holy Ghost since YOU HAVE BELIEVED???
So now we know that you have not been baptized in JESUS name for remission of sins or been filled with HIS spirit, why do you think you go to go?
With all of that being said,
If Peters first message IS NOT TRUE,
Acts 2:38-39
38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
39 For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call.
THREE QUESTIONS.
1. Are we still born in sin?
2. Will sin enter Heaven?
3. How do we get rid of them?
You keep assuming your conclusion & then arguing from it. I've already answered your question directly: YES! According to Scripture, I have received the Holy Spirit since I believed (Eph 1:13). You insist that "receiving the Holy Ghost" = speaking in tongues. Scripture doesn't support that notion as a salvation requirement.
What you really mean is: "FD, you haven’t spoken in tongues" (which BTW I've never said) therefore you can't be saved. That's your denomination’s definition, not the Bible's.
You're insistence that "receiving the Holy Ghost" = speaking in tongues. Scripture never cites that action as a salvation requirement.
I'll note just a couple (it's riddled with them) problems with your posts narrative
1 Cori 14:2 is about the gift of tongues in the church, not the new birth. Paul explicitly says not all speak in tongues (1 Cor 12:30). If tongues were required for salvation, Paul would never say that.
Eph 1:13 says believers are sealed with the Spirit when they believe. You’re trying to override Paul’s teaching with selective narrative events. That’s not how doctrine works.
You claim Acts 2, 10 & 19 support your "misguided mandatory tongues are necessary for salvation" doctrine. You're free not to accept the biblical definition unless it matches your denomination’s experience.
As for Acts 2, 8, 10 & 19. 4 special Church expansion events.
Acts 2, Salvations door opened to Jews 1st (Rom 1:16 & 2:10),
Acts 8, Samaritans (Jews that had intermarried/against Mosaic law. Jews viewed them as unclean & outside of covenant protections) Chapter 8 isn't about salvation. Its about the outward manifestation of the Spirit marking the inclusion of Samaritans into the church. They had already believed & been baptized. The Spirit "falling" was a Pentecost like Church expansion event. This actually disproves the idea that tongues are required for salvation. IS THAT WHY YOU LEFT THIS VERSE OUT?
Acts 10, Here God opens the door to salvation to Gentiles (Jews viewed them as unclean dogs, living outside of covenant seals). The Spirit falling, another Pentecost like outward manifestation of the Spirit marking the inclusion of Gentiles into the church.
Acts 19, disciples baptized by John. The Holy Spirit marking the inclusion Old Covenant "believers in Christ" brought into New Covenant.
ORDER OF SPECIAL NT/CHURCH INCLUSION HISTORICAL EVENTS
Passage - Believe - Baptized - Spirit received - Tongues - Hands laid
Acts 2 yes - after - Spirit falls 1st - Yes - No
Acts 8 yes - before - After apostles arrive - No - Yes
Acts 10 yes - spirit falls 1st - Before baptism - Yes - No
Acts 19 after hearing - after - After hands laid - Yes - Yes
Tongues in Acts a special event marking a new group entering the kingdom.
If tongues, water baptism or laying on of hands were required for salvation. Acts would show one consistent pattern. Instead, Acts gives 4 different sequences. These rituals that your sect requires for salvation aren't supported by scripture.
By GRACE are you SAVED thru FAITH & FAITH ALONE. NO rituals required.
None of 4 events cited say tongues are required for salvation, none of them say tongues equals receiving the Spirit.
If laying on of hands is required to receive the Holy Ghost. Then ALL the believers in Acts 2 & Acts 10 were never saved?
Again, you might want to rethink your sects false narratives.