I do agree with one thing, anyone who allows Ben Shapiro to bully them into submission on this issue is a coward. This video causes me to lose all respect for him and see him as nothing but a shill for some interests that for whatever reason want to shut down the investigation that Candace is doing.
Ben Shapiro CRASHES OUT on Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson at AMFEST! Erika Kirk JABS at Candace!
I disagree that the things Candace is saying are "baseless". She took issue with the "surgeon" saying that Charlie' Kirks neck was like the man of Steel and sure enough it turns out that was a lie, the surgeon never said it, rather it was a fabricated lie by the PR guy for TPUSA.
She took issue with many things that Harpool said about the security and sure enough TPUSA has parted ways with him and now there is an eyewitness placing him at a military base a few days before the assassination, potentially planning for some major military op. I see no reason why we shouldn't be asking about why he was there and who he met with.
Also today we learn that the rifle they found in the woods supposedly left by Tyler Robinson was planted by the police. These are stunning revelations being made and the only person whose complaints are baseless are those of Ben Shapiro.
But what is truly evil and irresponsible is Ben Shapiro saying that these questions should not be asked of TPUSA in "a time of mourning". That is the most idiotic thing I have heard. When do you think the investigation should ask the questions? After some patsy has already been convicted of the crime and everyone is saying that story is over?
I get that people don't like Candace Owens and have no issue with someone not wanting to listen to her show. I have posted links to at least six different channels. Now it cannot be denied that most of the investigations have originated from Candace, and others are simply extrapolating from her. That is also a fair observation which to some would be a complaint.On that blog, Candace Owens wrote — and I quote — about the “bat-sh*t-crazy antics of the Republican Tea Party.”
Wow, we have had 1,000 new visitors to this thread since the last time I pointed this out and it is all due to all the engagement, that is what drives the algorithm which is sending this thread out to the world.! Even if you don't have anything to say there is a little thumbs up emoji at the bottom right and a variety of different emojis you can click. By simply clicking any of those emojis you are giving this thread a thumbs up to the algorithm, and that engagement is what is really helping to push out the truth in this thread to thousands (at this point 45k+). This is important, if no one sees these posts implicating a frame job by the deep state and a coverup of a military operation in this assassination then they can get away with passing off some patsy as the killer. Therefore, thank you to everyone who has engaged in this thread, your contribution has been very helpful at sending out the truth.
4. In a nutshell the whiners and complainers are saying we should: shut up and let the government handle this investigation. Is that what "MAGA" did with the vaccine mandate? Is that what "MAGA" did with the question about election fraud? Of course not. So why on earth would a group of people known for not shutting up and trusting the government to do an investigation be torn apart by people who refuse to shut up and trust the government with the Charlie Kirk assassination investigation?
On that blog, Candace Owens wrote — and I quote — about the “bat-sh*t-crazy antics of the Republican Tea Party.”
She actually wrote those words. She published them. Under her own name.
But there’s more. She also wrote: “The good news is, they will eventually die off (peacefully in their sleep, we hope), and then we can get right on with the OBVIOUS social change that needs to happen, IMMEDIATELY.”
In 2016, Degree180 (Owens Blog) published an article mocking Donald Trump’s anatomy. His penis size, to be specific. The article called Trump’s actions “racist, bigoted and downright offensive.”
SOCIAL AUTOPSY: THE SMOKING GUN
On April 13, 2016, Candace Owens launched a Kickstarter campaign for something called SocialAutopsy.com. The goal was to raise $75,000 to build a database where people could submit screenshots of “offensive posts” to publicly expose internet bullies.
Here’s how she described it in her own words from the Kickstarter pitch: “We attach [people’s] words to their places of employment, and anybody in the entire world can search for them. What we are doing is figuratively lifting the masks up so nobody can hide behind, you know, Twitter handles or privatized profiles.”
Think about that.
After Social Autopsy failed, Candace Owens claimed she “became a conservative overnight.” Her own explanation? She said: “I realized that liberals were actually the racists. Liberals were actually the trolls… Social Autopsy is why I’m conservative.”
One failed Kickstarter. That’s what we’re told turned her from “Republicans should die peacefully in their sleep” to “Trump is the savior of Western civilization.”
And this pattern — this “scorn me and I’ll destroy you” pattern — would repeat itself over and over again:
2016: Liberals reject Social Autopsy → She burns the left and becomes “conservative.”
2018: Charlie finds Erika → She leaves TPUSA and finds George.
2024: Daily Wire rejects her → She burns them down.
2025: Trump doesn’t do what she wants on Israel → She burns him down.
2025: TPUSA doesn’t invite her to the memorial → She burns Erika and TPUSA down.
DAVID HOROWITZ: THE JEWISH MAN WHO MADE HER
Now sit up straight. Because what I’m about to tell you is the key to understanding everything that’s happened since.
Before Candace Owens was anybody — before she had any platform, any connections, any fame — she got an email. An email from David Horowitz, inviting her to speak at one of his Freedom Center events.
Here’s how Candace herself described it: “I started my career, my political career, on YouTube making just funny, satirical videos, and I got an email from David Horowitz inviting me to this conference, and let me just tell you what a big deal it was for me. I had no connections whatsoever.”
Candace joined the Daily Wire in 2021. By 2024, she was gone.
Along the way, she defended Kanye West through his Hitler praise. She took Hamas’s side after October 7, 2023. She liked a tweet promoting medieval blood libel against Jews.
In March 2024, she was fired.
Then came the full unmasking.
“Jews are not demonic.” (Basically, less than human)
“Netanyahu is a demon.”
Let’s look at the résumé:
Three companies started — two failed immediately, one (Social Autopsy) was shut down by Kickstarter in twenty-four hours.
TPUSA (2017-2019) — Couldn’t last two years with her “best friend” Charlie Kirk.
Prager U — Asked to leave.
Daily Wire — “Hated” Ben Shapiro by her own admission. Gone within months of real conflict.
Stephen Crowder — Tried to destroy him on her way out.
Every bridge. Burned.
Every relationship. Ended.
Every organization. Left in flames.
That’s not conviction. That’s a pattern.
THE QURAN: THE FINAL BETRAYAL
Nothing prepared me for this.
Candace Owens — the woman who rode conservative Christianity to fame — is now reading the Quran to her audience.
The book that calls America “the Great Satan.”
The book that calls Christians “infidels.”
The foundational text for every terrorist organization that has attacked American soil.
She’s not studying it academically. She’s promoting it. To conservatives. To Christians.
The mask isn’t slipping anymore. The mask is off.
THE COMPLETE STORY OF CANDACE OWENS: A PATTERN EXPOSED
1. I am the one accused over and over again of not having any evidence and yet I am the one who is posting evidence while the whiners and complainers have not posted anything.
I get that people don't like Candace Owens and have no issue with someone not wanting to listen to her show. I have posted links to at least six different channels. Now it cannot be denied that most of the investigations have originated from Candace, and others are simply extrapolating from her. That is also a fair observation which to some would be a complaint.
I also get that anyone who is a very high rated podcaster like Candace or Tucker will have their very good sources and so the show can be used by these sources to get their story out. In other words they have their own agenda which may or may not be in line with your agenda.
But here are the things that I have observed in this thread.
1. I am the one accused over and over again of not having any evidence and yet I am the one who is posting evidence while the whiners and complainers have not posted anything.
2. I don't simply post links for people to watch, I have heard directly that some of the chief whiners and complainers do not watch any of those links. I have also summarized the questions that have been raised. None of the whiners and complainers addresses those questions.
3. The things the whiners and complainers do say are prima facia absurd. For example, investigators should not be asking these questions of people at TPUSA while they are in mourning. That is the most idiotic thing anyone can say and is an excellent indication of the IQ of these whiners and complainers. A murder investigation needs to begin immediately after a murder. The key people of interest are the ones closest to the victim. Asking questions of the spouse and business associates is the proper protocol for a murder investigation.
4. In a nutshell the whiners and complainers are saying we should: shut up and let the government handle this investigation. Is that what "MAGA" did with the vaccine mandate? Is that what "MAGA" did with the question about election fraud? Of course not. So why on earth would a group of people known for not shutting up and trusting the government to do an investigation be torn apart by people who refuse to shut up and trust the government with the Charlie Kirk assassination investigation?
I get that people don't like Candace Owens
Well I can't argue with the basic points you are making.FWIW, I have only a few main problems with your content. You can obviously post and think whatever you choose to. One issue we've been through before and I'm not repeating here. Another issue I can identify in your above post - you post some of the most offbeat sources. Many of the videos you post have the most bizarre, doctored photographs of supposed catastrophes with mainstream media names imbedded as if they're from such media, and then they're actually from some obscure presenter who is just not worth watching. Couple this with your videos of "prophets" and such, and it becomes the boy who cried wolf and the chicken little sky is falling. You're so prolific as to be your own worst enemy.
Well, you people sure are working over time to pollute the jury pool with lies and deceptions in your efforts to try to get everyone to believe Tyler Robinson is an innocent fall guy who has been false accused.you must really be out of your mind if you think that anyone's goal is to have Tyler Robinson acquitted
Fake news! Pretty funny how slow people are to fall for this garbage.Eyewitness account pointing to a military operation to take out Charlie Kirk
Yes, all the evidence does add up to Tyler Robinson as being the lone assassinAll the evidence adds up to Tyler Robinson as being the lone assassin.
Thank you for that fake and false laughing hilarious list of claims you cannot prove.Actually the only evidence they have is an affidavit. Even the gun they claimed he left was actually planted. The claim that Charlie was killed with a 30-06 is also being questioned. According to the surgeon the only way it could have been a 30-06 was with a frangible bullet, but that is not the bullet that they found stopped by his neck bone, so that bullet also is hokey. Everything about the official report is falling apart. Was Tyler Robinson involved? Yes, that is very likely. But was he the lone assassin? That is almost surely false. Was he even an assassin? That is also looking less and less likely.

Did Candace Owens pay to have Charlie Kirk ass*ss*nated?
She definitely has something to hide.How come Candace Owens hasn't released her banking information to show that she didn't pay Tyler Robinson or his family to take out Charlie Kirk?
Well, he never did switch to being catholic so..How come there are multiple people telling us that Candace Owens actually hated Charlie Kirk?
That's EXACTLY what is going on.Is she purposefully leveraging her so-called friend's death for profit?
YES, that's what this is all about.To me, it's weird that Candace Owens was actually really struggling to be in the spotlight... until Charlie Kirk was taken out, and now all of a sudden she's relevant again. Do you guys think she planned all of this to rejuvenate her ratings?
She's tossed about by every wind of doctrine having been deceived by the old devil.is there anything CO hasn't flipped on?
I think the the left has been exposed. If somebody hasn't figured it out by now, I don't see anything changing that. And besides, the christian-patriot-truthers called checkmate against them alreadyI DESPISE all the conservative back biting. The left is so glaringly evil that we spend any time deviating on exposing them is shameful.
Yes, one thing I completely agree with Candace on is "I don't care about the mid terms". Tim Poole seems to think that everyone needs to stop investigating the Charlie Kirk assassination because for some reason it could hurt the mid terms. I could care less, that is the worst reason I have ever heard to justify telling people to shut up and trust the government investigation.I think the the left has been exposed. If somebody hasn't figured it out by now, I don't see anything changing that. And besides, the christian-patriot-truthers called checkmate against them already
The electorate isn't going to settle for a republican party that merely stops things from getting worse or be won over by gimmicky little hand-out schemes. No amount of pointing out the Democrats' failures will make the Republicans a success.
No amount of pointing out the Democrats' failures will make the Republicans a success.
Yes, one thing I completely agree with Candace on is "I don't care about the mid terms".