AI Has Been Secretly Lying to Christians and Here's How...
AI meets Fermi paradox, so where is everyone?
With a little HP Lovecraft twist.
The interesting question Enrico Fermi ask "where is everybody ?" is from a discussion he and other scientist were in at Los Alamos after the government had them looking at the possibility of extraterrestrial intelligent life It was that if our own galaxy,solar system was considered young and the others as much older then what are the mathematical probabilities of life other than earth. Fermi was born Catholic then migrated towards atheism but then back to agnostic because he could not disprove creation originating from a creator being. If evolution as scientist understand it is correct then life should have begun long before on earth and so evidence of life would be abound by now. We would have already been probed/explored by those beings if they were billions if not trillions of years more advanced than man on earth.
What caught my eye in some of the former post was the references to the Bible's creation narrative(Gen.1:1-2:4) or the information AI would have available to attempt it's decision of life's origin. If one was to take all the ingredients to make biscuits and lay them on a table they will continue to lay there until someone or something measures the flour,salt,liquid ect. and mixes them together and then cooks them. In the same each and every element of a living life form could be placed on earth(or elsewhere) but without someone or something allocating out those elements in their proportions and breathing the breath of life into it then it will also lay there forever without it's heart beating,breathing and without eating or revealing it's self and so will remain not alive. Although the story in Genesis 1:1-2:4 may seem written primitive or as parable if you consider the order of events as it is written it is scientifically sound. The place where the earth would exist is first so heaven proceeds earth in the order of events. Afterwards each event from one day to the next in the creation narrative is presented after the necessary creation for it's existence is created. When it was written water proceeds the creation created to live in it. The land proceeds the plant's and other life forms created to live on it. None of the explanation of the creation narrative is out of order having any of it created in an order incorrectly and existing before the substance it requires for life is created. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis 1&version=KJV
Yea I know the Fermi Paradox that's why I threw you a like plus the little allusion to aliens in the video. Your summary and take of the paradox is really great so I amended my emoji to an award.
You might like this movie, Immanence. It is free on youtube so I will just leave a link. It came out a few years ago but since it was during covid so it didn't really get much traction since obviously theaters were closed, but it's a fantastic movie with themes of creationism versus evolution, belief and perception, religion and science, and a special little twist.
saw it. good movie. a bit slow in spots, but good.
Yea I know the Fermi Paradox that's why I threw you a like plus the little allusion to aliens in the video. Your summary and take of the paradox is really great so I amended my emoji to an award.
You might like this movie, Immanence. It is free on youtube so I will just leave a link. It came out a few years ago but since it was during covid so it didn't really get much traction since obviously theaters were closed, but it's a fantastic movie with themes of creationism versus evolution, belief and perception, religion and science, and a special little twist.
I had not watched it but I did last night after you suggested it. I've never been much of a fan of horror type movies but I see what your seeing in that they try to balance the ET/religion type reasoning in many of these type movies. I think like with Fermi and most other scientist they know that if they begin their explanation with the big bang and mass spreading out in all directions then forming Hydrogen,Helium ect. they can then continue their explanation and most everyone will never spot what the error was. As much as Eisenstein understood that E=Mc2, which it does, it never explains the origin of that energy. Energy has no mass and cannot create matter. So then as with the big bang theory where in a void this energy is ejected outward with heat and force then forming the elements and then later life it never explains that energy's origin. In the first five verses of Genesis though it does not presuppose that light/energy exist of it's own but begins by explaining that from the beginning(the first day of creation) there was, void/formless(no mass) and also darkness(no energy/light) and explains the E=Mc2 issue by pointing out that light/energy must come first before mass. Bare in mind though that this was written some four thousand years ago most probably in proto Sinaitic long before mankind could work iron. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto- Sinaitic_script#:~:text=The%20Proto%2DSinaitic%20script%20is%20a%20Middle%20Bronze,Greek%20alphabet%20and%2C%20subsequently%2C%20the%20Latin%20alphabet. The reason I stated this is to point out that scientist try to dodge the question of where the energy it's self came from(when and how/by whom was it created) but that Genesis does not. In Genesis 1:1-5 it's author understands that in physics light/energy must exist first before mass and so E=Mc2 is only correct if both energy and mass already exist. https://biblehub.com/interlinear/genesis/1.htm
This is an interesting question given that it is already believed that humans are
seeking ways to eliminate those they feel are useless and cull the human herd
from 8 billion to perhaps at least half of that. A 2020 US election poll of 5,500
people found that a fifth of respondents shared this belief in one form or another.