Exposing the Danger of Following some Modern 'Bible scholars'

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Jon777

Active member
Sep 16, 2025
119
44
28
Virginia
The danger of not knowing the difference between “Free Will” and “Free Agency”. Read the difference –
https://www.monergism.com/inability-free-will-vs-free-agency

Reading a modern commentary by a so-called Bible scholar, one wonders if he is ignorant of the difference between Free Will and Free Agency, or intentionally deceptive, as he ignores the teaching of Calvinists like John Trapp and Charles H. Spurgeon whom he quotes out of overall theological context to support Arminian Free Will? IN WHAT SENSE IS THE PERSON DEAD IN TRESPASSES AND SINS?
https://enduringword.com/bible-commentary/ephesians-2/

From John Trapp (1601-1669), Puritan, from his commentary
- https://studylight.org/commentaries/eng/jtc.html

The whole man is in evil, and whole evil is in man. As the Chaos had the seeds of all creatures, and wanted only the Spirit’s motion to produce them; so our corrupt nature hath all sins in it, and wants but the warmth of Satan’s temptation to bring them into act, if God restrain not. Sure it is, we can stay no more from sinning, than the heart can from punting, and the pulse from beating. The first man defiled the nature; and ever since, the nature defiles the man. As poison put into a cup of wine disperseth itself, and makes it deadly; so original sin polluteth and poisoneth our whole man.” Gen. 3:7

Rev. 20:Ver. 5. But the rest of the dead] Dead in Baal worship, as Ephraim, Hosea 13:1; dead in sins, as Sardis, Revelation 3:1, I know thy works, that thou hast a name that thou livest, and art dead

“He [man] hath by his fall brought upon himself a miserable necessity of sinning, so that he cannot but "do wickedly with both hands earnestly"; which though it be no excuse, but an aggravation rather of his actual sin (that he doth it out of the pravity of his nature)” Gen 8:21

“Spiritual arguments to a carnal heart are but warm clothes to a dead man. He hath brought a miserable necessity of sinning upon himself: his soul and all the powers thereof being but the shop of sin; his body and all the parts thereof tools of sin; his life and all his actions of both soul and body a trade of sin.” Rom 8:7

Charles Haddon Spurgeon in his Defense of Calvinism
https://www.chapellibrary.org/book/doc2/defense-of-calvinism-a[3

“I am bound to the doctrine of the depravity of the human heart, because I find myself depraved in heart, and have daily proofs that in my flesh there dwelleth no good thing. If God enters into covenant with unfallen man, man is so insignificant a creature that it must be an act of gracious condescension on the Lord’s part; but if God enters into covenant with sinful man, he is then so offensive a creature that it must be, on God’s part, an act of pure, free, rich, sovereign grace. When the Lord entered into covenant with me, I am sure that it was all of grace, nothing else but grace. When I remember what a den of unclean beasts and birds my heart was, and how strong was my unrenewed will, how obstinate and rebellious against the sovereignty of the Divine rule, I always feel inclined to take the very lowest room in my Father’s house, and when I enter Heaven, it will be to go among the less than the least of all saints, and with the chief of sinners.”

“I have my own private opinion that there is no such thing as preaching Christ and Him crucified, unless we preach what nowadays is called Calvinism. It is a nickname to call it Calvinism; Calvinism is the gospel, and nothing else.”

Charles H. Spurgeon, from Sermon on Col. 2:13-14:
"The kind of death here spoken of is spiritual death,—death as to higher things than can be grasped by the hand, or seen with the eye, or comprehended by the natural mind. Only the spiritual man knows what spiritual things are, for they have to be spiritually discerned You would not think of teaching a horse the wonders of astronomy, because there is no mind in the horse that could learn that science; neither can we, of ourselves, teach spiritual things to our fellow-men, because, until they are born again, born from above, they do not possess the faculty with which they can grasp spiritual things. Our Lord Jesus said to Nicodemus, "That which is born of the flesh is flesh,"—and therefore can only lay hold of the things that are fleshly;—"and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit;" and until a man is born of the Spirit, he is without the faculty of understanding and enjoying spiritual things. As far as spiritual things are concerned, man's understanding is dead. He can comprehend the highest and most wonderful of sciences, but he cannot,—or, what is tantamount to it, he will not—understand the things of God. He turns on his heel, and says, "I cannot make out what you mean." No, we know that you cannot, and we are not surprised at your lack of apprehension, for it is just what the Bible leads us to expect. We even find. those who consider themselves to be learned divines rejecting the gospel, and saying that it is not consistent with their philosophy. We never thought that it was, and we never imagined that they could receive the gospel until they are converted, and become as little children. The great reason why men reject; the gospel is because they are not born again, because they have not received the life of God into their souls. If they had, they would understand it so as to delight in it; but the understanding, spiritually, is under a cloud of night, which the Word of God calls "death."

So also is the human will dead to spiritual things. When a person is literally dead, he cannot will to come to life; neither does any man ever will to come to Christ till the Spirit of God gives him that will, for his natural will is exerted in quite another direction, as our Lord said to the Jews, "Ye will not come to me that ye might have life." The will is a slave, it is held in chains, it is set on mischief, and resolved not to subject itself to the will of the Most High. Not morally, nor mentally, but spiritually, the will of man is dead.

So, too is it true of the affections that they are dead to spiritual things. Men, in their unregenerate state, will not love that which is good; alas! they will not love Christ. He is altogether lovely, yet unrenewed men see nothing in him that they should love. Holiness, purity, the will of God,—all these things are worthy of being loved, yet men do not love them; nay, they love the very opposite until the grace of God comes and quickens them."
https://www.biblebb.com/files/spurgeon/2605.htm
 
Dont listen to the scholars unless they agree with calvinism. All the other ones are intentionally deceptive. Does this include the ante-nicene church fathers, none of whom was a calvinist and all argued in favor of free will?
 
Dont listen to the scholars unless they agree with calvinism. All the other ones are intentionally deceptive. Does this include the ante-nicene church fathers, none of whom was a calvinist and all argued in favor of free will?

To understand a person’s beliefs in a vacuum lead to errors. There is the historical context to keep in mind.

The ante-Nicene Fathers emphasized free will to counter Gnostic fatalism, pagan determinism, and dualistic heresies that denied human moral responsibility. Gnosticism taught a deterministic dualism where salvation was for an elite class predestined by nature, while Manichaeism and Stoicism emphasized fate or cosmic forces overriding the will. Fathers like Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tertullian, and Origen countered this by insisting God created humans free to choose righteousness or sin, preserving divine justice in judgment and the reality of repentance.

The historical context of Augustine was a different problem then what the ante-Nicene Fathers faced. Pelagius denied original sin's full impact, claiming humans retain sufficient natural ability to choose faith and obedience without special grace. Augustine countered (c. 412–430 AD) that all are born in Adam's sin, incapable of seeking God (Romans 3:11), making salvation entirely God's gracious initiative via predestination.

Early Augustine based predestination on foreknowledge of free choices, influenced by Platonism. Later, against semi-Pelagians, he stressed unconditional election as the cause of grace, rejecting merit-based views while affirming wills are freed efficaciously for the elect. Upon deeper reflection on Paul—Romans 8–9, Ephesians 1—convinced Augustine that election precedes merit, with God choosing the elect for salvation while passing over others justly, as no one deserves grace.

The ante-Nicene Fathers did not write in the organized, systematic theology format typical of later church fathers like Athanasius, the Cappadocians, or Aquinas. There is a major difference between the free will that Adam had when he was created, but that changed once sin entered in, and man died that very day. "And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it. And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." (Gen 2:15-17, KJV)
 
  • Like
Reactions: rewriter
Considering we are all born helpless, ignorant, and selfish, we rely on instruction from parents and teachers.

As we learn that both parents and teachers are flawed, we begin to sift through what we are told for that which is true and useful. Those who are immature can be blown by every wind of doctrine. Maturity comes from Christ-likeness which is selfless love rather than the selfishness of the flesh.

The key to avoiding intentional or even unintentional error is maturity and the exercise of discernment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rewriter
The story of the man born blind in John's Gospel absolutely trashed Calvinism before it got supposedly born. Because it was already hashed and rehashed before Calvin even had a daddy...
Summed up in the question "Who Sinned?"

And if you don't understand the answer....then you do not understand God.
.......Despite all the heavy breathing....

Despite the claims of the supposedly most studious....those who claim the knowledge of the most scripture.....

There sits that parable that constitutes about a third of the Gospel of John.
And Calvinists want to dismiss it as "Just another miracle" and unimportant next to their TULIP or THEIR doctrines of grace.

But it absolutely trashes the calvinist notions of free will and free moral agency.


However...
Arguing with Calvinists (who believe they have nothing else to learn) is pointless. The truth staring them in the face is like the truth with flat earthers.

Because they claim that they know the truth. And they are the most pathetic type of people....those who refuse to learn.or believe they have learned everything they need to know.
 
Just like a people's language is spoken differently, even the interpretation and understanding of things can be different from person to person. The same thing can be interpreted in many different meanings or concepts. Confusion I guess.
 
By all means, do away with the scholars. We will learn to read the scriptures as they were first written, in koine Greek and biblical Hebrew, and without scholars we can learn by osmosis or direct revelation from God, just like God deposits money in our bank accounts whenever we need it.

Now if God does not deposit money in your bank account whenever you need it, it might well be smart to rely on scholars to provide context and background for your bible studies. Read those you wish but read with enough care that you can filter out what seems wrong. There are no absolute authorities, even the people of the day when the scriptures were written were flawed. But it is also true that they knew their current events, which included not only what had occurred, but also what was safe to admit to and what needed to be lied about in order to be safe.