In order to be fair and balanced, and to honor Charlie Kirk's legacy of being open to answer any and all questions I am posting this link, a question that was asked of Erika Kirk by a person on the left wing, who was also the last person to ask Charlie a question before he was assassinated.
Erika Kirk STUNNED by SIMPLE Charlie QUESTION!
After saying he condemned the hateful and violent rhetoric from people in his camp who applauded the assassination he asked if she would condemn the violent rhetoric of Donald Trump and he gave an example of Trump accusing six lawmakers of treason and saying on his X feed "hang them".
First, Erika answered his question with a question, then muddled around like it is a much bigger problem than just one person, it starts with the home. [That was a bizarre and completely irrelevant twist]. She asks "how are you raising your kids?" Ultimately her answer to "will you condemn the rhetoric of Donald Trump" was "Parent's step up!" What does this have to do with anything? Well she concludes with "do you want your children to be thought leaders or assassins?" So she forgives Tyler Robinson but guilts Tyler's parents while completely sidestepping the question.
Now when you include the fact that Trump paid $40 million for the Charlie Kirk Memorial it sure seems like she is not going to condemn him for anything.
To be fair and I hope everyone who decides to comment on this will also be fair, and by that I mean you tell us how you would have answered that question.
I would have said this.
1. What those six did had the appearance of treason. It is not for me to say whether or not they are guilty of treason, but I can certainly say "It looks like treason to me and I would like the military and DOJ to investigate whether or not it is".
2. I would definitely not say "Hang them". That is inflammatory, everyone is innocent until proven guilty, and in a climate where people are being assassinated daily his speech can certainly be seen as inciting others to violence.