Amen Lord, so we call on you to drive out Tobiah's family from the temple court just as Ericka said in likening what is going on to the story of Nehemiah.
Charlie Kirk - so what now ?
- Thread starter the_seeker
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
- Status
That's pretty arrogant. Do you have the source for that?
Yes, I already posted it, she was on an interview on Fox with Faulkner. See Posts 1492 and 1493, I think both of those links had clips from that interview.
TPUSA claims they didn't have drones at the event that would have seen the shooter on the roof, this guy who drove in with Charlie as a friend of his who also did security claims they had drones up an hour before the event and Charlie was getting pictures from the drones texted to his phone.
If a rich woman was murdered, and the husband inherited her estate, and all of the husband's associates kept lying to the investigation team about their strange behaviour after the crime, and then when the heat was on, the husband finally asked the investigation team to stop... That's quite suspicious.
Of course, the husband would be the prime suspect at that point.
But what does that have to do with the lies that TPUSA has said and Erika telling people to stop asking questions?
TPUSA should probably just "stop" because every time the react they dig a deeper hole for themselves.
Someone (hopefully not someone from TPUSA) even went as far as to change her husband's birthday on Wikipedia to try and make it look like she was lying about what she was doing on dec15... this is crazy.
Tim Pool just shouldn't have even gotten involved. Candace didn't force him to have Milo Yianopolis on his show.
I wonder what tricks TPUSA et. al. Might have up their sleeve. I doubt anything CO is saying is actually illegal; so her weak point is probably physical security (which everyone knows now thanks to Tim Pool).
I'm just praying for everyone's safety and hoping the whole truth comes out quickly.
Someone (hopefully not someone from TPUSA) even went as far as to change her husband's birthday on Wikipedia to try and make it look like she was lying about what she was doing on dec15... this is crazy.
Tim Pool just shouldn't have even gotten involved. Candace didn't force him to have Milo Yianopolis on his show.
I wonder what tricks TPUSA et. al. Might have up their sleeve. I doubt anything CO is saying is actually illegal; so her weak point is probably physical security (which everyone knows now thanks to Tim Pool).
I'm just praying for everyone's safety and hoping the whole truth comes out quickly.
CO said the only one who could stop her was Erika. Erika spoke, now CO needs to shut up and let the law do it's work.
Yeah...thanks. I'm just catching up. It seems she has been on FOX like a long running commentary lately. I don't watch her. I kind of start to get the ick and feel sorry at the same time
JMO but Candice Owens is a grifter. She's made Kirks entire death about herself. Now she claims the French Foreign Legion is trying to kill her! Talk about crazy, this woman is nutty as squirrel poo. She's made Erika's life more difficult, the TP staffs lives more difficult, and all for clicks and money. Why would anyone want to unalive Owens? She yaps about all these "receipts" she has and it's all talk. Even her friends are starting to back away from her seeing what she's headed for. She brought it on herself.
Yes, she said she would stop, but she said she needed Erika to be specific, what exactly did CO say that was not true. She said she is human, she makes mistakes, by all means go on record and tell her what errors she has made.
I'm no fan of Candace for sure. I guess the only think I can say for sure, is that I don't know. This thread seems to be doing a fine job of trying to convince people that Erika is fake and possibly got Charlie murdered. I'm not into watching all the stuff going on at FOX;they should just call themself the Trump channel. The world is in a fine mess and this country is no exception even if they want to think so.
The only one who actually does know the whole story and what's what is God. Even if the truth does not come out in this world (whatever it may be) there is the next world where we all will know, finally, all the 'truths'
But no worries, Owens will reap what she sows as will we all.
Yep, no doubt about it, she has probably made 100k in the last three months, not all about Charlie Kirk's assassination, but quite a bit is. Of course TPUSA has made $140 million in donations in those same three months, also as a result of Charlie Kirk's assassination. So if CO is a grifter because she makes money as a podcaster, what does that make TPUSA?
Why is it if you ask questions about the investigation you are a grifter? Why is it that if you are told lies, for example there were no drones up, that was a lie, or that the security team was first rate when they couldn't see this kid on the roof assembling a rifle, why can't you ask questions?
To say that CO has "profited" from her podcast is true, but to say she built it on Charlie's assassination is completely bogus. She has built her podcast over years and years, she already was a top rated podcast when he was killed. She is a close friend of Charlie's so why wouldn't she be focused on the investigation of his assassination?
Erika Kirk's Story Fell Apart on Charlie Kirk's Final Message! Candace Was Right!
He goes into the allegation that Charlie was telling people that they were going to kill him prior to the assassination.
He gives you a clip coming from Erika saying she has Charlie's phone and it wasn't like that, she checked.
He also gives you one man who said that Charlie told him this one month before the assassination and he called him and asked if he had added to his security and Charlie said yes.
So when I heard Erika I had this nagging question. She went through all his text messages and emails and found what people were referring to and according to her they are misrepresenting what he said. OK, show us the text or email. Right? I mean you found it, you already did all the work. If you need to redact the name of who it was said to, fine.
Instead of telling CO to stop asking for this, just give it to us. You have already confirmed that you saw the text or email and there is another witness who has already gone public that he got this message, as well as three sources that CO has that want to remain anonymous. Altogether there are 5 people confirming they know about this, and only Erika says they are misunderstanding. So walk us through it so that we can all see and we can put this to bed.
Yeah, but a lot has happened in between now and then; and as CO said, EK said stop "lying", without actually pointing out any lies. TPUSA has lied about her, and the things they are saying aren't mistaken misinformation in several instances they look like blatant lies.... so I really don't even see candace stopping because of EK.
In the last few days going back to Tuesday I have posted links to 6 channels, different youtube channels, to this thread.
These six different videos have the following number of views:
40,000
150,000
9,600
43,000
1,800,000
129,000
I then looked at the last video the Charlie Kirk show posted, it has been up 18 hours, longer than some of these but obviously less than those from Tuesday or Wednesday.
They had 6,000 views.
My point is not that the number of views proves who is telling the truth, my point is that the Charlie Kirk show is being destroyed because they are not answering the questions about the assassination. For example:
1. You had drones up before the event, why couldn't you see a shooter on the roof assembling a rifle?
2. You had a security team that had active death threats. Why didn't they see the man on the roof when many in the event saw him?
and
3. Erika says she saw the messages that Charlie sent saying they were planning to kill him. Why doesn't she go ahead and reveal them, even if she wants to redact the name of the recipient. She has been doing one talk show after another, this is what would interest people.
The legacy of Charlie Kirk was that he took any and all questions. If they are going to honor Charlie we don't need them to build a whited sepulchre, we don't need them to build some grand tomb. The best way to honor his legacy is to answer any and all questions.
These six different videos have the following number of views:
40,000
150,000
9,600
43,000
1,800,000
129,000
I then looked at the last video the Charlie Kirk show posted, it has been up 18 hours, longer than some of these but obviously less than those from Tuesday or Wednesday.
They had 6,000 views.
My point is not that the number of views proves who is telling the truth, my point is that the Charlie Kirk show is being destroyed because they are not answering the questions about the assassination. For example:
1. You had drones up before the event, why couldn't you see a shooter on the roof assembling a rifle?
2. You had a security team that had active death threats. Why didn't they see the man on the roof when many in the event saw him?
and
3. Erika says she saw the messages that Charlie sent saying they were planning to kill him. Why doesn't she go ahead and reveal them, even if she wants to redact the name of the recipient. She has been doing one talk show after another, this is what would interest people.
The legacy of Charlie Kirk was that he took any and all questions. If they are going to honor Charlie we don't need them to build a whited sepulchre, we don't need them to build some grand tomb. The best way to honor his legacy is to answer any and all questions.
TP is Charlies organization!! Of course they are going to have donations after his tragic death!! CO is a podcaster and there's hundreds of them out there. That's why she's a grifter, cause she knows dang well the outrageous things she's saying is getting her likes and clicks and follows because she's made herself part of the story!! She's made herself more important than his own wife!!
She's doing more than asking questions, she's muddying the water with outrageous claims. She making it near impossible to get a jury because it's all over social media and TV. No one owes Candice a dang thing. No one has to answer her questions. She is not the law, she is no one, she's not important to the case in any way.
She hasn't shut her mouth since the man died. And she has gained clicks, likes and follows like crazy because of this one topic. It's between this and hate the Jews. She's rollin' in the dough.
She was a close friend, they had parted ways according to people who knew them both. BUT even if they were best buddies at his death she is not focused on the investigation, she is focused on her own ideas, theories and anything that can bring her to the front of the conversation. The French want to murder her. Seriously.
- Status