Jews ate the bread of angels in the wilderness?
They do not have bodies?
That could just be metaphorical speech, or means the manna came from angels, like AngelDash® or something. You are possibly reading into the text that angels ate the manna
Jews ate the bread of angels in the wilderness?
They do not have bodies?
And, when they appeared to Abraham in Genesis 18?
Guess what Abraham served them to eat?
You need to reconsider your position on that one, and try to figure out that being dematerialized does not mean they do not have
a real body when materialized....
As far as Luke 34:39?
Look at my hands and my feet. It is I myself! Touch me and see; a ghost
does not have flesh and bones, as you see I have.”
Please... surrender to the right side of truth.
Otherwise You are going to regret it someday, when being a rebel will be looked down upon, and no sympathizers will be found.
A big question IMO is why would angels have a reproductive organ? Do they have urinals in heaven? Did the angels who got kicked out of heaven receive that punishment for peeing against the wall of the heavenly Jerusalem instead of using the heavenly bathrooms stocked with Angel Soft TP?
Some of the fallen angels left their own habitation (spiritual body) to take on a lower form of biologial body in order to have sex with the women.
It's not about do they have the plumbing to have sex but that they are generally more responsible beings than man is, just not these fallen angels. Why do people think that Angels must not have the plumbing because they dont have sex? It's as if some''s perspective is if you have the plumbing you have no choice except to do it? That's sort of laughable, lol. Never said no before? Mankind is so irresponsible.
Jews ate the bread of angels in the wilderness?
They do not have bodies?
This is just pagan mythology IMO, and there is no biblical evidence that angels have the capability to become flesh and blood.
There is biblical evidence, I spoke of it in post#36.
This is just pagan mythology IMO, and there is no biblical evidence that angels have the capability to become flesh and blood.
It's not conclusive and not compelling IMO
also I might ask what do you think of the Book of Enoch?
I have not read the whole thing, however found some parts very interesting perhaps the part, that as I remember have the Angels what seems like human form I gather, yet again I am curious you answer for I have only viewed this book quickly... I imagine you saying that it is not a credible Book, yet I digress
how would you answer the Angels in Sodom, or better yet when Paul says that you maybe entertaining Angels
Think Matrix. Agent Smith wasn't a real human, but he looked and acted like one.
Think Matrix. Agent Smith wasn't a real human, but he looked and acted like one.
I replied to fast I read you think Matrix somewhere else, should have read the last part, when you said looked and acted like one, but not one, that is all I was saying, if I would have read further I would have just agreed.. well said I believe
not that I promote movies.... for in my heart of hearts I have been warned off of them, yet I do not judge others on this matter
That could just be metaphorical speech, or means the manna came from angels, like AngelDash® or something. You are possibly reading into the text that angels ate the manna
The Hebrew word does not mean angels; it means mighty ones, ie, food of the mighty ones
Man did eat angels' food: he sent them meat to the full. Psalms 78:25H47 אַבִּיר 'abbiyr (ab-beer') adj.
mighty (spoken of created beings: men, angels, and beasts).
How come you want to claim to know so much?
For that leaves your denials to be without excuse.