I don't either.
Good then we're in agreement, all Jews aren't culpable for Christs death. No need for further discussion.
I don't either.
I get suspicious when hit by that, because it seems like a strategy to throw the chess pieces off the table by getting people into a ridiculous argument. These things are not always done consciously though.
The emptiness of the argument should be obvious to most.
It is based on the Idea that as part of the government of Palestine has been outside Palestine throughout history it therefore has no right to exist as an entity?
Well part of the Australian government is in the British Crown, and the Crown operates as a separate City State from Britain, just as Washington operates as a separate entity from America. Both have part of their government in the Vatican.
By that sort of logic, if the world becomes governed by a computer none of us have the right to exist.
The British Mandate of Palestine was a joint effort between the Palestinians and British. Many Palestinians also resisted it, but the Mandate none the less became victorious as a joint British/Palestinian state.
Since the British part of the arrangement sailed home the Palestinians have been left with their own independent state, sad as that may sound.
There is still a considerable number of simple minded folk who would compare the Israelis to Caleb, Joshua and David, and compare the Palestinians to Goliath and the Canaanites.
Once people get like that they have itching ears for almost anything that seems to support their view.

Logic, reason and God's word are not enough for the replacement people. Even the fact that Israel exists by a series of miracles does nothing to change their minds. They will discover their error soon enough.
I've asked for people who keep parroting "Replacement Theology" to show me where the replacement is taking place in the picture below:
View attachment 282812
More in a follow-up post...
We do not believe in replacement, but fulfillment.
Brother Steve Gregg, while I do not agree with all of his conclusions, lays out the best scriptural case for our position that I have found thus far.
I'll leave this here for your prayerful consideration.
But ultimately it seems to me the assertion that Palestine was never a nation is really at heart a de-humanizing statement.
Its a two hour presentation. And you gave up before it even began. That does not exhibit a willingness to truly hear from God on these matters.I tried, 13 mins in and he's already going against what the Word teaches. Pity.
And yet the truth is Palestine was never a nation. And that is why this issue is such a difficult one because people are speaking from emotion rather than fact. There has never been a Palestinian nation, facts matter and that is a fact of history that you cannot prove wrong.
Well, I can save you a lot of bother on my part, I never said we aren't one in Christ.
Here's a good example of Replacement Theology that popped up.
"Replacement theology, or supersessionism, teaches that the Christian church has replaced the Jewish people as God's chosen people and that the promises made to Israel in the Old Testament have been fulfilled in the church. This doctrine asserts that God's covenant with Israel is no longer valid, and that a new covenant was established through Jesus Christ for Christians alone. As a result, this view concludes that there are no longer specific future plans for the nation of Israel, and that Old Testament prophecies were redirected to the church.
And the fact that at the time the promise was given, Abraham was neither an Israelite or Jewish. Is he even now, either of those things? An Israelite most certainly in the fulfilled spiritual sense, but definitely not a Jew.You're missing the part where the promises given to Abraham were given to all in Christ.
And the fact that at the time the promise was given, Abraham was neither an Israelite or Jewish.
You're missing the part where the promises given to Abraham were given to all in Christ.
And the fact that at the time the promise was given, Abraham was neither an Israelite or Jewish. Is he even now, either of those things? An Israelite most certainly in the fulfilled spiritual sense, but definitely not a Jew.
I wonder what is worse: speaking from emotion or telling people they don't exist?
You're missing the part where the promises given to Abraham were given to all in Christ.
Yes, from the historical perspective it is not as simple as "it was never a nation" and there is a lot that is not well known unless one takes the time to read the primary source documents.
This indicates a lack of understanding regrading how "nation states" come into existence.
But ultimately it seems to me the assertion that Palestine was never a nation is really at heart a de-humanizing statement.