So now you are a licensed clinician who can diagnose, and you wonder why you have no peace?
Not likely. You and all of us invite trouble into our lives when we reject the life of tranquility and peace He offers those who are truly His.
best wishes
Charlie Kirk - so what now ?
- Thread starter the_seeker
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
- Status
So now you are a licensed clinician who can diagnose, and you wonder why you have no peace?
Not likely. You and all of us invite trouble into our lives when we reject the life of tranquility and peace He offers those who are truly His.
best wishes
We are spirit, soul, and body, the body wears out and we go home. We go home before our time is we miss the mark, and/or those who are required to intercede for us fail in they're God given responsibility. Last one I knew personally the Lord honored the prayer He guided me in and the tumor died, he is still with us about 10 years since that event with no recurrence. Would that you had grown the way the Lord teaches in the Word that you would have had that same experience. What He does for one He will do for another.
goodbye
DOJ Launches Full Investigation into UC Berkeley After University FAILED to Protect Conservatives at TPUSA Event — Antifa Terrorists Turn Campus Into War Zone | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft https://share.google/iJW4cX5xwXZK1gaDt
Just look at our troubled contributors!
Good thing Bigfoot is here to offset the TDS drivel!
As I said, "Fun times". Creative good and evil blurring reality. Best to know what's real and true.
that is the key- we have to try to always get our truth from His unchanging truth!
He declared that the final week has begun! Does this mean the oblations and sacrifices have been resumed?
If Trump did it by himself, then I agree. But I believe given the same support, anyone of us who are not corrupt could have - even an anonymous, 2-month old social media account (Biden "won" his election from his basement, afterall, and I don't think Kamala was even subject to a vote for party candidate?) The question for me is are the hands that put Trump in place going to deal with the Epstein pedophiles like was promised in the election, and stop this America second nonsense which has been going on since Kennedy's assassination. If not, Trump is just trading a rock for a hard place.
I don't have absolute faith in the guy, no. He's not God, and I believe the American people have a duty to voice their displeasure at his not meeting his election promises of holding Epstein's clients to account, and putting America second instead of first. He's done some good things, but if it's at the expense of children and America, he will cost more lives that he saves. As this thread is on Charlie Kirk's public execution, I'll expand on this point the obvious corruption of the FBI and that it shouldn't be trusted to do anything - and it would seem Trump is enabling it?
they're not. it's just more anti-Semitic
, par for the course for a grifter like Owens
I don't know who "they" are but you've got her pegged.
FBI whistleblower pans bureau for alleged ‘gross misconduct’ and ‘fraud’ in early Jan. 6 pipe-bomb investigation
Joseph M. HannemanSteve Baker
November 12, 2025
The Biden FBI is guilty of “gross misconduct and/or fraud” for calling off surveillance of an early person of interest in the Jan. 6 pipe-bomb case, an FBI whistleblower alleges in a letter to Congress. The letter refers to events that occurred nearly five years before Blaze News disclosed that the surveillance subject lived next door to a Capitol Police officer who is now a potential forensic match to the gait of the bomb suspect.
After reading the Nov. 10 protected whistleblower disclosure from an FBI supervisory special agent who is still at the bureau and a Nov. 8 Blaze News investigation of the pipe-bombs case, U.S. Rep. Thomas Massie believes the FBI “has been engaged in a cover-up” or has been “grossly incompetent.”
“Either way,” Massie (R-Ky.) told Blaze News in a statement, “these latest revelations about the pipe-bomb investigation require answers from the new FBI director.”
The Blaze News investigation said former Capitol Police Officer Shauni Rae Kerkhoff, 31, appears to be a forensic match to the gait of the pipe-bomb suspect. A forensic gait analysis arranged by Blaze News rated Kerkhoff’s stride as a 94% match to the individual shown on video planting pipe bombs the night of Jan. 5, 2021.
The gait analysis used a computer algorithm to analyze walking parameters including flexion (knee bend), hip extension, speed, step length, cadence, and variance. The veteran analyst who ran the study said based on visual observations the program can struggle with, he personally pegged the match at closer to 98%.
Nailed it! She is awesome.Melissa Dougherty wrote the following description [in part] for the above video:
"I don’t care if this makes me lose followers. We must learn to think critically. Honor Charlie Kirk’s memory by thinking the way he did: not blindly believing, getting swept up in conspiracy, but following the truth through verified evidence, not what one person claims is true. Paranoia is not discernment. Confidence is not competence. Charisma is not credibility. When someone needs to be the hero, the victim, and the authority all at once, then I have a hard time believing that truth is their goal. Seems like they're after power and control.
I fully expect a wave of backlash from Candace’s followers. I think that’s exactly why so many people stay silent. But I just don’t care. Remember: the ones trying to bring people back to reality aren’t being divisive. It’s the ones disconnected from reality who are. This is a core reason why I have such strong issues with unfounded and sensationalized conspiracy theories.
I will GLADLY take this video down and publicly repent if Candace Owens can prove, with verifiable evidence:
1. How TPUSA executives or associates were directly involved in Charlie Kirk’s murder with specific, detailed, and corroborated facts verified by law enforcement, journalists, or court proceedings beyond Candace Owens' personal claims.
2. That her claim that Tyler Robinson did not commit the murder is backed by credible, independently verified evidence... not speculation, assumptions, or anonymous claims, and beyond Candace Owens' personal claims.
3. That her alleged “inside sources” or “federal leaks” actually exist, and that they’ve provided verifiable, legally obtained, and independently confirmed information. Simply asserting “I have sources” or “I know people on both sides” without documentation, names, or corroboration does not count as proof beyond Candace Owens' personal claims.
4. That multiple reputable, independent investigators or journalists, outside of Candace Owens herself and her own media network, have verified her claims through credible, documented evidence.
5. That none of her public statements or implications have recklessly misled her audience, defamed innocent people, or emotionally exploited a murder case for engagement or personal branding.
I implore everyone to understand this: logic and critical thinking apply everywhere in life. This is a part of apologetics, testing what we believe and why we believe it, and seeking out objective truth. I've made multiple videos over the years talking about mind control tactics and how having a deeeeEEEP mistrust can cause paranoia under the guise of discernment. People fall into conspiracies and idolize those who start them because chronic mistrust warps their ability to interpret reality. When you’re convinced everything is rigged, everything starts looking like a clue. That paranoia becomes a worldview. And once someone believes they have “special knowledge,” it feeds their ego and they feel smarter, safer, and more in control than everyone else. The consequences? They stop looking for truth altogether. They instead start looking for confirmation. Evidence becomes optional. Relationships fracture. Dialogue dies. And they become vulnerable to manipulation by anyone who can exploit their fear and flatter their sense of “secret insight.”
She speaks for me. She has expressed my exact same thoughts and questions on CO's 'theories'. Critical, logical thinking and discernment needs to be a part of every conversation, especially when it comes to public accusations and rumor-mongering that can destroy lives.
"I don’t care if this makes me lose followers. We must learn to think critically. Honor Charlie Kirk’s memory by thinking the way he did: not blindly believing, getting swept up in conspiracy, but following the truth through verified evidence, not what one person claims is true. Paranoia is not discernment. Confidence is not competence. Charisma is not credibility. When someone needs to be the hero, the victim, and the authority all at once, then I have a hard time believing that truth is their goal. Seems like they're after power and control.
I fully expect a wave of backlash from Candace’s followers. I think that’s exactly why so many people stay silent. But I just don’t care. Remember: the ones trying to bring people back to reality aren’t being divisive. It’s the ones disconnected from reality who are. This is a core reason why I have such strong issues with unfounded and sensationalized conspiracy theories.
I will GLADLY take this video down and publicly repent if Candace Owens can prove, with verifiable evidence:
1. How TPUSA executives or associates were directly involved in Charlie Kirk’s murder with specific, detailed, and corroborated facts verified by law enforcement, journalists, or court proceedings beyond Candace Owens' personal claims.
2. That her claim that Tyler Robinson did not commit the murder is backed by credible, independently verified evidence... not speculation, assumptions, or anonymous claims, and beyond Candace Owens' personal claims.
3. That her alleged “inside sources” or “federal leaks” actually exist, and that they’ve provided verifiable, legally obtained, and independently confirmed information. Simply asserting “I have sources” or “I know people on both sides” without documentation, names, or corroboration does not count as proof beyond Candace Owens' personal claims.
4. That multiple reputable, independent investigators or journalists, outside of Candace Owens herself and her own media network, have verified her claims through credible, documented evidence.
5. That none of her public statements or implications have recklessly misled her audience, defamed innocent people, or emotionally exploited a murder case for engagement or personal branding.
I implore everyone to understand this: logic and critical thinking apply everywhere in life. This is a part of apologetics, testing what we believe and why we believe it, and seeking out objective truth. I've made multiple videos over the years talking about mind control tactics and how having a deeeeEEEP mistrust can cause paranoia under the guise of discernment. People fall into conspiracies and idolize those who start them because chronic mistrust warps their ability to interpret reality. When you’re convinced everything is rigged, everything starts looking like a clue. That paranoia becomes a worldview. And once someone believes they have “special knowledge,” it feeds their ego and they feel smarter, safer, and more in control than everyone else. The consequences? They stop looking for truth altogether. They instead start looking for confirmation. Evidence becomes optional. Relationships fracture. Dialogue dies. And they become vulnerable to manipulation by anyone who can exploit their fear and flatter their sense of “secret insight.”
She speaks for me. She has expressed my exact same thoughts and questions on CO's 'theories'. Critical, logical thinking and discernment needs to be a part of every conversation, especially when it comes to public accusations and rumor-mongering that can destroy lives.
That's pretty funny right there!
I wonder if Candance will fill a lawsuit against Melissa Dougherty
It might be good if someone draws Candice in to court to force here to prove her claims
I saw this same logic during the Pandemic.
I had questions about why they were mandating an experimental vaccine and I was told to show them the proof that something was wrong with the vaccine. That is backwards. It is their job to show me the proof that the vaccine was safe and effective, not my job to show proof it isn't.
So then, with Charlie Kirk's assassination the FBI is investigating, not me. They tell me this guy shot Charlie. OK, how did he get that close to Charlie Kirk with a rifle? Logical question. They say he disassembled the rifle, put it in his backpack and carried it in. OK, so I check and sure enough even if you take the rifle apart it does not fit in a backpack. But this explanation now raises more questions. Why does your explanation not make sense? Also, when did he reassemble it? Was he on the roof with his tools putting the rifle together or was he inside a college building putting together a rifle, walking down the hall and through a window, or did he use a ladder to get onto the roof? If it is a ladder, where did he get the ladder from. If he is in the building why does no one inside this college building not see a man with a rifle climbing out onto a roof? Also, from 200 feet away he was easily visible on that roof to security. Why didn't the security see him?
It is not my job to investigate this murder, but if you give me an explanation where the gloves don't fit, then of course I am going to ask questions about that.
Also, why would the killer, after shooting Charlie and everyone is looking for him stop and disassemble the gun again? Surely at this point he must still be on the roof in plain sight. He then goes to a park and puts the rifle back together again and leaves it there? If he was going to leave the rifle why not just leave it at the site and flee immediately. If it is hard to sneak a rifle into a college campus think how hard it must be to sneak it out after assassinating someone.
These are reasonable questions, and fully my right to ask them so that I can understand. It is the FBI's job to answer them, not to tell me that it is my job to prove their explanation is false. No, it is there job to prove it is true.
Of course there are other questions like how does a rifle that powerful hit Charlie's neck and spine without severing it?
Also, whose career and reputation is being ruined by asking simple and logical questions?
We don't know who killed Charlie Kirk (at this point there has not been a trial or a conviction for the murder yet). We don't know why he was assassinated. But we do know who profited. We do know that an audit was called for by Charlie 8 days before the assassination and that audit was canceled after the assassination. We also know that the amount of fraud is estimated at $40 million, so that is certainly a sizable sum which could be a motive. If someone was going to be exposed by that fraud they profited when Charlie died. We also know that several very large donors had withdrawn their support from TPUSA because of Charlie's refusal to ditch Tucker Carlson. If TPUSA changes policies as a result of the assassination and those donors return to them then that would also be a significant consideration as a motive. Finally Erika Kirk has become CEO as a result of Charlie's assassination. As a new CEO it is perfectly reasonable to check out her resume. No one is ruining her reputation by examining her resume.
Finally, no journalist is going to reveal sources and whistleblowers. What an evil request this lady is asking for.
- Status