Do you always encourage people to ignore Gods word ?Save your energy and put him on ignore. It will give yourself a peace of mind.
Yes you do your track record of condemning Christians say you do.
Do you always encourage people to ignore Gods word ?Save your energy and put him on ignore. It will give yourself a peace of mind.
No. I always encourage people to ignore false doctrine.Do you always encourage people to ignore Gods word ?
Yes you do your track record of condemning Christians say you do.
Is God a God of ifs and butsDid Adam have free will? If Adam had free will, yet we do not have free will until we are “chosen” (all while being considered chosen from the foundation of the world, via Calvinism) then someone of the elect had free will but at the same time did not. That means the elect were only capable of choosing evil until they were “regenerated” all while being one of “the elect”. And if they were the elect according to Calvinism, then why the need for being born totally depraved or regenerated? Makes no sense.
Self justification in your part againNo. I always encourage people to ignore false doctrine.
Are you one of the elect? Were you chosen before the foundation of the world the way Calvinism teaches?Is God a God of ifs and buts
You can believe that.Self justification in your part again
I've only expressed his will
Can the blind lead the blind
well his word says so.You can believe that.
elect means adoption to the sonAre you one of the elect? Were you chosen before the foundation of the world the way Calvinism teaches?
Absolutely. It flat out goes against Calvinism, so shouldn’t you believe the word?well his word says so.
It should be believed shouldn't it ?
Humorous, but no. Being without unabated freewill doesn't preclude the ability to make choices.
Doesn’t change the main point of my questions.elect means adoption to the son
was satan there when God called Moses out of Midian? Please provide chapter and verse. thanks.Yep it says not only was he anointed in the garden he was also anointed at the time when Moses was at the mountain God, there's a huge amount of time there, wouldn't you say.
you do not believe that the serpent mentioned in Rev 20:2 is the same serpent mentioned in Gen 3:1?Jordon said:There only possibilities that you mention.
Theres many that people mention
The serpent was possessed
The serpent was satan
The serpent was a crafty animal
The serpent ate from the tree of knowledge first before eve
I just wonder tho why should one possibility be any more valid than the other ?
It's because folk law gets imprinted in beliefs is my best guess
Genesis 2:9 And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.we both agree Jesus was the tree of life
But I wonder are you unsure if Jesus was offering them salvation in the garden.
Or to look at another are you unsure if they where already saved in the garden
Just to touch on something you said even tho God knows the future.
Life still has to take it's cause.
I would like to believe it m but I cant believe possibilities with a whole heartwas satan there when God called Moses out of Midian? Please provide chapter and verse. thanks.
you do not believe that the serpent mentioned in Rev 20:2 is the same serpent mentioned in Gen 3:1?
.
Maybe this will this is no difference to God knowing who will be his before the foundations of the worldDoesn’t change the main point of my questions.
so ... is G I Williamson claiming that man will do only evil even though man is free to do good ?No. Thanks to man's disobedience, we have lost the ability to please God.
Now “every imagination of the thoughts of his heart are only evil” (Gen 6:5).
The Bible clearly and consistently teaches (1) man is free to do good or evil, that he is at liberty to do either, but (2) that he is able to do only evil because of his fallen condition.
** G I Williamson **
Acts 9:15 But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of IsraelGalatians 1:15 Paul
But when God, who set me apart from my mother’s womb and called me by his grace
Did God call Paul by grace in his mothers womb.
And set him apart for what ?
when was he chosen mActs 9:15 But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel
.
No, Paul was not a Calvinist. He was an apostle. I already addressed Gal. 1 earlier.Maybe this will this is no difference to God knowing who will be his before the foundations of the world
Was Paul a calvinist ?
Galatians 1:15 Paul
But when God, who set me apart from my mother’s womb and called me by his grace
Did God call Paul by grace in his mothers womb.
And set him apart for what ?
Your answer is here as to what he was set apart for and when he called him by grace,
Acts 9
But the Lord said to Ananias, “Go! This man is my chosen instrument to proclaim my name to the Gentiles and their kings and to the people of Israel. 16 I will show him how much he must suffer for my name.”
Then Ananias went to the house and entered it. Placing his hands on Saul, he said, ‘Brother Saul, the Lord – Jesus, who appeared to you on the road as you were coming here – has sent me so that you may see again and be filled with the Holy Spirit.’ 18 Immediately, something like scales fell from Saul’s eyes, and he could see again. He got up and was baptised, 19 and after taking some food, he regained his strength.
This was God knowing the day when Paul was in his mother's womb he would be called by grace and filled with the holy spirit