Charlie Kirk - so what now ?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
She was specific, she was not talking about in the US but worldwide. She also said this took place with this most recent podcast. So tell me where I would look to see how many people are viewing any given podcast worldwide?

I think one conclusion is certain and that is that she is doing very well ever since leaving Ben Shapiro. Her being fired has been a blessing to her, not a curse. She expressed nothing but thanksgiving to all those who had been involved in having her fired.
yeah because she hates Jews
 
Sometimes, the truth seems offensive to those whose cherished beliefs it disproves. I'd be open to discuss the trustworthiness of Candace Owens' claims on a different thread, if it would be permitted by the site. As I said before, though, she brings receipts. No one can disprove what she says, as she backs it up with proof. Therefore the hateful slander against her, instead of open debate.

Also the reason her podcast has become the world number one - people are looking for the uncomfortable truth, rather than the comfortable lies they have accepted for so many years.
She's been selected by the globalists who own Alphabet Inc. to be #1 and granted millions of views ($$$$). She's one of their agents who can spout all the uncomfortable truths she wants as long as she doesn't support Trump and uses her uncomfortable truths to divide MAGA.
 
she's not the biggest podcast in the world by any stretch of the imagination.
look at Joe rogan's numbers versus Candace Owens
OK, well Joe Rogan also agrees that the official story does not make any sense and is not believable. He said "none of it adds up" and "there is way more going on behind the scenes".

According to the official story this kid broke down the gun, put it in a backpack to get into campus. Problem is that gun will not fit in a backpack. Then after shooting he broke the gun down again, put it back in the backpack, jumped off a roof that is 14 feet off the ground and then reassembled the gun to leave it in a park.


Joe Rogan EXPOSES Erika’s Secret Arrangement.. (Candace Owens Was RIGHT!)
 
Take a look this guy disassembles a 30-06 rifle while on a the roof. According to the official story this is what the shooter did after shooting Charlie Kirk.


This video said he couldn't do it because he couldn't bring his barrel vice.

So this video take 43 seconds to disassemble, but you need to then put the barrel down your pants, store up your tools and the screws so you can reassemble it.


Are we supposed to believe he sat on the roof for the next 43 seconds disassembling this while everyone is looking to see who shot Charlie?
 
"I don't know who did it, but I know who profited from it" Joe Rogan
 
She's been selected by the globalists who own Alphabet Inc. to be #1 and granted millions of views ($$$$).
First, millions of views does not equal $$$$. While Candace Owens may make some money for views (as does everyone else in that industry), far more is to be made by being corrupt. Netanyahu and the Israeli regime is allegedly paying influencers $7000 per propaganda piece, and there are even some "Christian" pastors preaching against Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson in their sermons in return for kickbacks!!! It's far more lucrative to be secretly corrupt than openly honest.

She's one of their agents who can spout all the uncomfortable truths she wants as long as she doesn't support Trump and uses her uncomfortable truths to divide MAGA.
Second, did you notice the prominent "MAGA supporters" like lying Ben Shapiro were once never Trumpers?

("In the spring of 2016, Shapiro wrote an article for the Daily Wire in which he stated he would "never vote for Donald Trump". Shapiro supported Ted Cruz in the 2016 presidential election and opposed Trump's candidacy.")

If anyone has divided MAGA, it's Trump himself by surrounding himself with this ilk of people post election - people who were once his and America's enemies - and going against the base who voted him in to put America first (i.e. not Israel first), amongst other unfulfilled promises, such as holding the pedophiles on the Epstein client list to account.

Yes, it's possible there's a secret plan for Trump to actually be working in America's interests. But the American people should not be relying on this - Trump is clearly putting another country ahead of America's interests, and should be called out for it.
 
OK, well Joe Rogan also agrees that the official story does not make any sense and is not believable. He said "none of it adds up" and "there is way more going on behind the scenes".

According to the official story this kid broke down the gun, put it in a backpack to get into campus. Problem is that gun will not fit in a backpack. Then after shooting he broke the gun down again, put it back in the backpack, jumped off a roof that is 14 feet off the ground and then reassembled the gun to leave it in a park.


Joe Rogan EXPOSES Erika’s Secret Arrangement.. (Candace Owens Was RIGHT!)
Are we looking at another JFK/Lee Harvey Oswald conspiracy theory scenario? :unsure:
 
And it all began with everyone trying to figure out how to take a Mauser model 98 that weighs 9 pounds and is 49.2 inches long and make it fit in the backpack he has when jumping off the roof without having 10,000 dollars worth of machine shop work done to it.
 
And it all began with everyone trying to figure out how to take a Mauser model 98 that weighs 9 pounds and is 49.2 inches long and make it fit in the backpack he has when jumping off the roof without having 10,000 dollars worth of machine shop work done to it.

You too? :cry:
 

Oh no not me I believe he had a hacksaw in the backpack too and sawed the rifle into three pieces and then it fit in his backpack. Don't ask me any questions though about how he has it in the backpack and in one piece before he got up on the roof I'm still working on that.
 
Oh no not me I believe he had a hacksaw in the backpack too and sawed the rifle into three pieces and then it fit in his backpack. Don't ask me any questions though about how he has it in the backpack and in one piece before he got up on the roof I'm still working on that.

I'm wondering if i should continue conspiracy theory discussions with you.
It's a tough choice for me but i'm considering it because you show good reason in other areas. You also have said that you do work in behavioral area of the human psyche?
 
I'm wondering if i should continue conspiracy theory discussions with you.
It's a tough choice for me but i'm considering it because you show good reason in other areas. You also have said that you do work in behavioral area of the human psyche?

Now if I was a conspiracy theorist I would have suggested that there were two involved one who actually did it while the other intentionally walked by cameras and climbed on and off roofs to throw them off the other.
 
Now if I was a conspiracy theorist I would have suggested that there were two involved one who actually did it while the other intentionally walked by cameras and climbed on and off roofs to throw them off the other.

 

Ok I was going to play some more but I have stuff to do now so just for the sake of sanity. I bet there's a whole lot of information that those investigating this case has never even told the press like something's color or the actual photo of the rifle but who knows what just to see if anyone else mentions it when they never did. Everyone on the internet is going to go wait that don't make sense about it because they don't have all the facts. If the rifle was heavily modified it may have had one of two breakdown modifications but that's not a DIY project it needs be done by a high quality gunsmith so there's a paper trail. Everyone's going to question everything about a case like this based on the limited information the media has been given until it's all over and everyone has all the facts. In short everyone's left scratching their heads over things they noticed don't make any sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eli1
Ok I was going to play some more but I have stuff to do now so just for the sake of sanity. I bet there's a whole lot of information that those investigating this case has never even told the press like something's color or the actual photo of the rifle but who knows what just to see if anyone else mentions it when they never did. Everyone on the internet is going to go wait that don't make sense about it because they don't have all the facts. If the rifle was heavily modified it may have had one of two breakdown modifications but that's not a DIY project it needs be done by a high quality gunsmith so there's a paper trail. Everyone's going to question everything about a case like this based on the limited information the media has been given until it's all over and everyone has all the facts. In short everyone's left scratching their heads over things they noticed don't make any sense.

When i'm at my 2nd espresso i may choose to engage you in these 3 high-level categories.

1. The mechanics of weapons, where i would need you to explain just what in the world you're talking about, and i would need you to explain them to me like i'm 5, because i don't understand guns and i don't like guns (which is also why i live in Massachusetts).

2. Some basic physical facts (which i'm very good at) about trajectory, cameras etc.

3. The human component itself which may include things like, meaning, purpose and more importantly your point. These things may also include how people process grief. Including family members. I can share some stories of my extended family too.

By the way, the only thing i know about guns is that this video of Val Kilmer in the movie HEAT is still used i'm told (by police and army folks in Mass) for training on how fast one should change a magazine.

Val Kilmer's Rapid Reload Scene in HEAT That Shocked Marines
 
Are we looking at another JFK/Lee Harvey Oswald conspiracy theory scenario? :unsure:
I think the thing we should realize is the people who provide security are not the keystone cops. If they behave like them then something is very wrong.

The official story does not fly any longer. We have video of the supposed killer jumping off the roof. He throws down his bag first and we can be very certain there is no rifle disassembled in that bag, that is a certainty. Then we see him climb down and jump off a 14 foot roof. There was no disassembled rifle in his pants, that also is very certain. So he did not come off that roof with the 30-06 rifle.

Second, the idea that he sat on the roof and disassembled the rifle after shooting Charlie, a process that would have taken him at least 43 seconds if not more, that is laughably absurd. You had a courtyard with a couple of hundred people turning around and looking for a shooter within seconds of him being shot.

The third thing you need to know is that the security is trained to check rooftops, windows, etc. In a ministry like this we would expect them to have a drone that is flying in the air and observing what is going on. It reminds me of the assassination attempt on Trump in Pa. Why was a shooter able to get within the perimeter? In the same way why was this person able to get so close with a rifle?

What Joe Rogan said cuts to the heart of this. "I don't know who killed him, but I do know who profited". We know that as much as $40 million had been embezzled from TPUSA and Charlie had ordered a full audit 8 days before the assassination, but after his death that audit was cancelled. We also know that several very big, wealthy donors were putting pressure on Charlie to cut off Tucker Carlson and Charlie refused, saying he was not going to censor free speech. Their concern was over Tucker Carlson's stance on Israel. Charlie was also reevaluating his position on Israel and the conflict. Because of this several very big donors withdrew their support from TPUSA. They wanted their donations to allow them to control the ministry, Charlie refused. Of course Erika became CEO and inherited everything Charlie had when he died. We will see if she makes changes to win those donors back or if she stays on the same path that Charlie was on. Tucker was invited to speak at the Memorial, so there is that.
 
Oh no not me I believe he had a hacksaw in the backpack too and sawed the rifle into three pieces and then it fit in his backpack. Don't ask me any questions though about how he has it in the backpack and in one piece before he got up on the roof I'm still working on that.
You do know that they claim he then reassembled the rifle and left it in the park somewhere. Are you saying the reassembled rifle has been cut into three pieces with a hacksaw? Or did he then use superglue to put it back together?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Charlesiii
Now if I was a conspiracy theorist I would have suggested that there were two involved one who actually did it while the other intentionally walked by cameras and climbed on and off roofs to throw them off the other.
Are you referring to the man who shouted that he had shot Charlie right after he was shot and then to keep people focused on him dropped his pants?
 
Ok I was going to play some more but I have stuff to do now so just for the sake of sanity. I bet there's a whole lot of information that those investigating this case has never even told the press like something's color or the actual photo of the rifle but who knows what just to see if anyone else mentions it when they never did. Everyone on the internet is going to go wait that don't make sense about it because they don't have all the facts. If the rifle was heavily modified it may have had one of two breakdown modifications but that's not a DIY project it needs be done by a high quality gunsmith so there's a paper trail. Everyone's going to question everything about a case like this based on the limited information the media has been given until it's all over and everyone has all the facts. In short everyone's left scratching their heads over things they noticed don't make any sense.
It would be simple for the FBI to debunk all this speculating by simply showing us that the rifle had been cut into three pieces. Therefore not showing us this either means it is not true, or that the FBI is at fault in letting rampant speculation take hold. BTW, wouldn't cutting the rifle into three pieces make the rifle less accurate?
 
You do know that they claim he then reassembled the rifle and left it in the park
Are you referring to the man who shouted that he had shot Charlie right after he was shot and then to keep people focused on him dropped his pants?
It would be simple for the FBI to debunk all this speculating by simply showing us that the rifle had been cut into three pieces. Therefore not showing us this either means it is not true, or that the FBI is at fault in letting rampant speculation take hold. BTW, wouldn't cutting the rifle into three pieces make the rifle less accurate?

somewhere. Are you saying the reassembled rifle has been cut into three pieces with a hacksaw? Or did he then use superglue to put it back together?

Satire ZNP think satire no one who has ever used a bolt action Mauser of any caliber knows it wont fit in a backpack.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Charlesiii
Status
Not open for further replies.