Charlie Kirk - so what now ?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Lest we forget what this "Christian" poster said the day after he was brutally murdered in front of his family, and thousands of others:

RESIDENT ALIEN:
"He was a right-wing extremist and activist. Not to mention a racist and a bigot. Don't let his boyish good looks fool you. It's not known if it was politically motivated, though that would be a reasonable guess.

I have compassion for those he left behind, who loved him; but I'm not at all shocked or surprised by this. It was predictable. You reap what you sow."

@PennEd : On the other hand: what if what @ResidentAlien said is true?!
 
@PennEd : On the other hand: what if what @ResidentAlien said is true?!

That’s impossible.
Because RA’s compass is broken.
It doesn’t point north anymore. Just goes crazy and rotates.
Because he’s said many crazy things like Trump is Hitler etc and in true leftist fashion he isolates himself and can’t engage when questioned.
So yes, that’s impossible.
 
That’s impossible.
Because RA’s compass is broken.
It doesn’t point north anymore. Just goes crazy and rotates.
Because he’s said many crazy things like Trump is Hitler etc and in true leftist fashion he isolates himself and can’t engage when questioned.
So yes, that’s impossible.

Oh, dear!

Well, as @ResidentAlien's brothers and sisters in Christ, we should be here to give him love and understanding and support!
 
Oh, dear!

Well, as @ResidentAlien's brothers and sisters in Christ, we should be here to give him love and understanding and support!

That’s what we’re doing bro.
We’re telling him to wake up but like I said earlier Trump’s hair bothers him a lot. I mean A LOT.

Libs are angry that we’re not accepting their definitions of male and female anymore they’re a bit angry but yes we are here for them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PennEd
That’s what we’re doing bro.
We’re telling him to wake up but like I said earlier Trump’s hair bothers him a lot. I mean A LOT.

Libs are angry that we’re not accepting their definitions of male and female anymore they’re a bit angry but yes we are here for them.

@Eli1 : Good comments, Bro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eli1
like I said earlier Trump’s hair bothers him a lot. I mean A LOT.

Libs are angry that we’re not accepting their definitions of male and female anymore they’re a bit angry but yes we are here for them.

In other words, he's reprobate.
 
@PennEd : On the other hand: what if what @ResidentAlien said is true?!
Forget the lies about Bigotry and racism. Categoric lies.

He said he reaped what he sowed!
You are saying there is a possibility RA is right, and he DID reap what he sowed.

Are suggesting that because of whatever speech he engaged in, he DESERVED to blown away in front of his wife and children?

Can you clarify? Otherwise your post is VERY disturbing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeanM and Eli1
No, it wasn't. I reposted it for you to read. It was directed at HeIsHere. I asked you after that post if you could think for yourself. The initial post said nothing to you, didn't mention your name, didn't ask for your defense.
You are blatantly lying. Either you are mad, don't understand English, or deception is your second nature, and I can't figure out which yet. I post your comment below - again. My name is Charlesiii. You posted to Charlesiii. That is directing a comment or question at me!!! If you keep denying the obvious, I'm going to have to put you on ignore. It's not personal, but I can't converse with one who will deny what was said only several 2 pages prior.

@Charlesiii so are you aligning yourself with everything HeIsHere says, just so I know for the future. Or can you think for yourself?

As irrational as judging a person for not having a signature? Don't be kind, be you. Why hide your real self? I'll make sure to judge everything you do and say irrationally and see how you enjoy it.
Until you admit you directed a comment or question to me (and then denied you did it repeatedly), I don't see you in a position to judge who is irrational.

I didn't, you didn't. The post you took HeIsHere's side on didn't mention you and wasn't directed at you. But none of this is about that. This is about my support of the Jews. I won't change it. I can support a person on one thing and disagree on another. HeIsHere can't, apparently you can't either. Duly noted. I can ignore you both.
As posted above. You clearly used my username, directing a query to me. Don't deny it.
 
And Romans 2:29 is reason to be a racist Jew hating bigot???

Romans 11:14 - Christians should provoking them be to jealousy so that some will get saved, not being racist against them in hate and bigotry
I don't think anyone is talking about Christians supporting racism except you...
 
  • Like
Reactions: DeanM
If the words " I , me, mine" are in our vocabulary we are not where we need to be as Christians, we are no longer our own when we are in Him.
best wishes
I don't ignore your words, friend. Refer to Proverbs 9. I, me and mine does indeed belong to Him, He and Thine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeIsHere
You are blatantly lying. Either you are mad, don't understand English, or deception is your second nature, and I can't figure out which yet. I post your comment below - again. My name is Charlesiii. You posted to Charlesiii. That is directing a comment or question at me!!! If you keep denying the obvious, I'm going to have to put you on ignore. It's not personal, but I can't converse with one who will deny what was said only several 2 pages prior.



Until you admit you directed a comment or question to me (and then denied you did it repeatedly), I don't see you in a position to judge who is irrational.

As posted above. You clearly used my username, directing a query to me. Don't deny it.

The "think for yourself" comment was pretty funny though, :D if you read people's posts around here. notice how they swoop down on those who dare challenge the accepted narrative on any topic, people are shunned out of the news forum all the time over and over again.

Do you read anything outside of the Rupert Murdoch talking points? Rarely, oh but they can can differentiate between a man and woman so that is all that matters, as though that is the sum total of political discourse.

I wish there was a more superlative word than irony cause it just does not really hit the mark anymore.
 
In regards to our walk with Him, if we are focused on I me and mine, we have not been conformed to the image of the Son to the point where people look at us and see Jesus.
Look at the world through the lens of the Father, not ourselves, this is the renewing of the mind as He requires of His Own.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThereRoseaLamb
In regards to our walk with Him, if we are focused on I me and mine, we have not been conformed to the image of the Son to the point where people look at us and see Jesus.
Look at the world through the lens of the Father, not ourselves, this is the renewing of the mind as He requires of His Own.
God's truth is never old.
Only perhaps to those who miss the mark.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ThereRoseaLamb
You are blatantly lying. Either you are mad, don't understand English, or deception is your second nature, and I can't figure out which yet.

ThereRoseaLamb said:
@Charlesiii so are you aligning yourself with everything HeIsHere says, just so I know for the future. Or can you think for yourself?

I am talking about the initial post # 842 !!! I was not speaking to you. I knew HisH was going to mark an x on the post but I asked you AFTER that post why you were in a flap when nothing was said to you so why were you marking an x. So I am NOT lying, you are misunderstanding which post I have been talking about. Go look at it. In that post you were not mentioned. And here comes HisH again to stir up trouble and back you up. Your name was not mentioned in that post, and you said you did it for whatever reasons and the argument went from there. I am not a liar, and I don't expect an apology. From you or your friend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dude653
The "think for yourself" comment was pretty funny though, :D if you read people's posts around here. notice how they swoop down on those who dare challenge the accepted narrative on any topic, people are shunned out of the news forum all the time over and over again.
I feel like I'm in one of the old horror movies where people aren't getting the obvious!

Do you read anything outside of the Rupert Murdoch talking points? Rarely, oh but they can can differentiate between a man and woman so that is all that matters, as though that is the sum total of reality.
:LOL: So true. It's like if they can recognise this basic biological fact that the 6 year old child got in Kindergarten Cop back in the day, they are experts on everything!

I wish there was a more superlative word than irony cause it just does not really hit the mark anymore.
Yes. We're all agreed it was absolutely sickening that some were celebrating Charlie Kirk's violent and public execution, but when Zionists like Josh Hammer post tweets supporting "public execution" mere hours before Charlie Kirk's very public assassination, or subsequently call - in public - for the "neutralisation" of honest journalists like Tucker Carlson for reporting on the same, crickets. The same rule needs to apply for all - calling for violence is not a right for the Left or for Zionists.

Great signature line and profile picture, by the way. I think it really helps weed out true doctrine from false, especially in this time where so many are believing in heresy.
 
In regards to our walk with Him, if we are focused on I me and mine, we have not been conformed to the image of the Son to the point where people look at us and see Jesus.
Look at the world through the lens of the Father, not ourselves, this is the renewing of the mind as He requires of His Own.

Paul referred to himself many times in his letters, so what are you saying he was not conformed to the image of Christ.
You are misusing and misapplying scripture as a way to judge others and their walk.

Not cool.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.