Charlie Kirk - so what now ?

[ZNP]

there was a clip when he was asked about how many School shooters have been transgender.
His reply was "too many"
That was not an answer to the question or was it and honest attempt to engage the question.

Then he was asked a question about how many mass shootings happen in America in his reply was...... does that include gang violence?
Another dodge and disingenuous answer.

so I guess he was good at dodging questions

It isn't a dodge. Have you ever heard that "serial killers are usually white males"? A serial killer is someone who has killed three or more people. By that definition serial killers are almost exclusively members of criminal gangs and enterprises. But they exclude all the gang violence, all the cartels. It is just like the Lord's word that they strain out the camel and then choke on the gnat. By all means let's strain out the gnat, but 80% of the problem is gang violence, why are we ignoring that?

 

[gb9]

there was a clip when he was asked about how many School shooters have been transgender.
His reply was "too many"
That was not an answer to the question or was it and honest attempt to engage the question.

Then he was asked a question about how many mass shootings happen in America in his reply was...... does that include gang violence?
Another dodge and disingenuous answer.

so I guess he was good at dodging questions

the transgender answer- acceptable.

( any school shooting done by anyone is horrible).

as far as " mass shootings", do a little research in how the media defines a mass shooting, and you will see it is nowhere near as bad as made out to be..

 

[Dude653]

the transgender answer- acceptable.

( any school shooting done by anyone is horrible).

as far as " mass shootings", do a little research in how the media defines a mass shooting, and you will see it is nowhere near as bad as made out to be..

an honest answer to that question is that a very tiny percentage of school shootings are done by transgender people

 

[ZNP]

an honest answer to that question is that a very tiny percentage of school shootings are done by transgender people

I think the main factor common to most if not all is that they view themselves as outsiders who in many cases were bullied.

However, if anyone has ever seen the dog whisperer he explains how the pack can identify problem dogs. I am wondering if sometimes the bullying is simply kids realizing this other kid is a psychopath. It doesn't mean the bullying is the right response but rather there is a problem and it is never 100% on one person and 0% on the other. Perhaps some of what is perceived as "bullying" is simply the kids realizing there is something seriously scary about this other kid. That may explain why the kid is a loner.

 

[Dude653]

I think the main factor common to most if not all is that they view themselves as outsiders who in many cases were bullied.

However, if anyone has ever seen the dog whisperer he explains how the pack can identify problem dogs. I am wondering if sometimes the bullying is simply kids realizing this other kid is a psychopath. It doesn't mean the bullying is the right response but rather there is a problem and it is never 100% on one person and 0% on the other. Perhaps some of what is perceived as "bullying" is simply the kids realizing there is something seriously scary about this other kid. That may explain why the kid is a loner.

that doesn't address what I said.
The reality is that transgender people are extremely tiny percentage of school shooters.
Most School shooters are cis white men

He dodged that question for a reason

 

[ZNP]

that doesn't address what I said.
The reality is that transgender people are extremely tiny percentage of school shooters.
Most School shooters are cis white men

He dodged that question for a reason

Transgender students are an extremely tiny percentage to begin with. The issue is not race and it is not some other factor, the factors that are most relevant are people who are loners and were bullied. They may be loners because the other kids have realized something is wrong with this kid. So it may be that they became school shooters because kids bullied them and they had no friends, or it may be that they had no friends because kids realized something was really wrong with them and ultimately it was manifested when they were school shooters.

 

[Dude653]

Transgender students are an extremely tiny percentage to begin with. The issue is not race and it is not some other factor, the factors that are most relevant are people who are loners and were bullied. They may be loners because the other kids have realized something is wrong with this kid. So it may be that they became school shooters because kids bullied them and they had no friends, or it may be that they had no friends because kids realized something was really wrong with them and ultimately it was manifested when they were school shooters.

Probably the point that student was trying to make is that it's not fair to demonizing an entire demographic of people for the actions of a few.

Remember when Greg Gutgeld went on Fox " "News". and said that being transgender or being a transgender Ally equates to thinking murder is okay?

 

[ZNP]

Probably the point that student was trying to make is that it's not fair to demonizing an entire demographic of people for the actions of a few.

Remember when Greg Gutgeld went on Fox " "News". and said that being transgender or being a transgender Ally equates to thinking murder is okay?

I must have missed that but I do remember being demonized because a few people got arrested on January 6. You had a million people at that rally, you have many, many rallies prior to that one, and yet less than 100 are arrested. That meant that 99.9% were not arrested.

 

[Doll]

True. As an example of what we are blessed not, being in the grace of God .

there was a clip when he was asked about how many School shooters have been transgender.
His reply was "too many"
That was not an answer to the question or was it and honest attempt to engage the question.

Then he was asked a question about how many mass shootings happen in America in his reply was...... does that include gang violence?
Another dodge and disingenuous answer.

so I guess he was good at dodging questions

You are truly lost and depraved in spirit thinking you can judge him.
You claim you've watched his videos,so ignorance isn't your excuse.
Patent evil is your demeanor.

He didn't dodge the question. You're just incapable of understanding his answer. Which was exactly on point.

I would be a waste of time to try to explain to someone who have their mind made up as an enemy of the truth what Charlie was actually pointing out.

You are devoid of grace.

 

[Dude653]

You are truly lost and depraved in spirit thinking you can judge him.
You claim you've watched his videos,so ignorance isn't your excuse.
Patent evil is your demeanor.

He didn't dodge the question. You're just incapable of understanding his answer. Which was exactly on point.

I would be a waste of time to try to explain to someone who have their mind made up as an enemy of the truth what Charlie was actually pointing out.

You are devoid of grace.

sick ad hom

do you have anything that addresses the actual topic

 

[ZNP]

Candace Owens has an excellent podcast which has methodically refuted a lot of the lies the media and government officials have tried to spread.

Yes, The C.I.A.* has verified all of her claims.

*Candace Intelligence Agency

 

[Citizen]

Candace Owens has an excellent podcast which has methodically refuted a lot of the lies the media and government officials have tried to spread.

Disagree. She claimed to be Charlie's friend, and but could not wait until after the funeral to start dumping unsubstantiated claims, conspiracy theories, and gossip about him in public. Imagine being Erika Kirk and hearing this trotted out in public while you're grieving and have no way to defend yourself and your family. Owens could have shown some humanity, but she chose not to because that's who she really is. That whole thing was despicable.

I have yet to see any actual hard evidence that Owens is a reliable source of information. She can say anything she wants and spin a fantastic story that seemingly supports her theory, but that's not hard evidence. Her latest claim is that Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and Peter Thiel are not human but 'hybrids'. Yes, she said that and no, she's not going to provide a shred of evidence because she can't. Whether anyone likes those people or not, she has smeared and dehumanized them.

Her theories and claims get more and more absurd because she knows she'll get more attention and more followers. I'm not a fan of Brigitte Macron, but should she prove her case in court and win, I hope she sues Owens into oblivion.

 

[Doll]

Disagree. She claimed to be Charlie's friend, and but could not wait until after the funeral to start dumping unsubstantiated claims, conspiracy theories, and gossip about him in public. Imagine being Erika Kirk and hearing this trotted out in public while you're grieving and have no way to defend yourself and your family. Owens could have shown some humanity, but she chose not to because that's who she really is. That whole thing was despicable.

I have yet to see any actual hard evidence that Owens is a reliable source of information. She can say anything she wants and spin a fantastic story that seemingly supports her theory, but that's not hard evidence. Her latest claim is that Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and Peter Thiel are not human but 'hybrids'. Yes, she said that and no, she's not going to provide a shred of evidence because she can't. Whether anyone likes those people or not, she has smeared and dehumanized them.

Her theories and claims get more and more absurd because she knows she'll get more attention and more followers. I'm not a fan of Brigitte Macron, but should she prove her case in court and win, I hope she sues Owens into oblivion.

The mistake that can be made in regards to Owens is to think she's a grounded credible journalist.

If you watch her videos you'll notice her reporting is based on hearsay.
"I've been told..." And such.
That's not evidence.

That's the stuff of tabloid trash reporting. I.E. " A source says...."

Her rant begins at 13:23

That chick is no friend of Charlie or his widow.

 

[Dude653]

The mistake that can be made in regards to Owens is to think she's a grounded credible journalist.

If you watch her videos you'll notice her reporting is based on hearsay.
"I've been told..." And such.
That's not evidence.

That's the stuff of tabloid trash reporting. I.E. " A source says...."

Her rant begins at 13:23

That chick is no friend of Charlie or his widow.

Candice Owens is a grifter and a con artist. she sued her high school for racial discrimination and now she claims that she's never experienced racism in her entire life.

 

[ZNP]

Candice Owens is a grifter and a con artist. she sued her high school for racial discrimination and now she claims that she's never experienced racism in her entire life.

So are you jealous, no one said that the left has a monopoly on hypocrites.

 

[SomeDisciple]

So are you jealous, no one said that the left has a monopoly on hypocrites.

If Dude would have bothered to look into Candace, she is a black sheep in her family, politically. People change when they leave high school and the influence of their older family.

On another note, there's a guy now saying the FBI told him to delete evidence. And not only that; they called him later to confirm whether or not he deleted it.
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/charlie-k...i-demanded-he-delete-disturbing-video-1750195

"bury the truth or it will hurt your feelings" -MSM, FBI

 

[seed_time_harvest]

Something needs to be done about the easy access to guns by every unstable person that comes along. Unfortunately, the US government is owned by the gun lobby and they don't have the political will to go against them. I support the second amendment. But is there no one is intelligent enough to come up with something that would be a win/win for everyone? I think they could, they just don't want to upset the applecart.

True but those in agreement with the nra say that if you give them an inch they'll try to take a mile.

 

[ResidentAlien]

True but those in agreement with the nra say that if you give them an inch they'll try to take a mile.

If those in agreement with the NRA have a plan to prevent people from being gunned down, we'd all love to hear it. Democrats are the only ones doing anything. If Republicans don't like what the Democrats are doing with gun legislation, let them get off their butts and do something instead of simply whining about what the Democrats are doing.

 

[ZNP]

If those in agreement with the NRA have a plan to prevent people from being gunned down, we'd all love to hear it. Democrats are the only ones doing anything.

Yep, the Democrats plan is to hand over their lunch money to the bullies.

Back to the Future (1985) - You're George McFly! Scene | Movieclips

"Don't you know if you let people walk over you now they'll be walking over you for the rest of your life"

 

[Citizen]

If those in agreement with the NRA have a plan to prevent people from being gunned down, we'd all love to hear it. Democrats are the only ones doing anything. If Republicans don't like what the Democrats are doing with gun legislation, let them get off their butts and do something instead of simply whining about what the Democrats are doing.

And what are you and the democrats doing to prevent people from being murdered by others using cars, knives, bombs, and any other non-gun methods? Let us know.

I'm not opposed to the idea of regulating arms sales to 'unstable' people, but who gets to decide what that means? Not so many years ago, transgender was recognized for what it is: a mental illness. Thanks to the dems it's now a celebrated and protected class of people. Absolute insanity has won on the left, but yeah - let's let them regulate arms sales. If the dems are in power and able to set regulations, guaranteed the first group they will charge as unstable will be Christians.

The democrats are now the socialist/communist party, so save the propaganda about how they're the only ones doing anything. The dems are hell bent on destroying this country - that's the agenda, that's the goal, that's the ONLY thing they are doing. And they will start by disarming citizens by any means possible, just like every other socialist/communist regime before them.

If the blatant calls for violence and assassination from the left - including political leaders - has not woken you up, nothing will. They literally don't care about murder and violence. They encouraged and promoted the blm/antifa riots, they manipulate crime statistics, they cry racism if anyone brings up gun violence in places like Chicago. THEY DO NOT CARE. They just want a way to remove guns from those who disagree with them and stand in the way of their agenda.

Interesting factoid: Socialist and communist regimes have mass murdered an estimated 100 million people. Once it takes over, you have zero rights to anything, including your life. Even more reason to protect second amendment rights.