Can We Really Exercise Free Will?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
This is how the meat of the word gets buried.

To the reformed crowd Roman 9,10 and 11 is all about us dead folks that can't choose God. God's Sovereignty determines His elect. Period. End of story.

Lazarus was a dead man that God resuscitated. Lazarus could not make a choice. Therefore, we are dead men and can't make a choice. Period. End of story.

Everything That is truly being taught is buried under a 1000 ft of ashes via wood, hay and stubble ........All from the reformed theory.
Yup. Its an hoax IMO. A very sinister hoax.
 
Jer 18
5Then the word of the LORD came to me, saying, 6“Am I not able, house of Israel, to deal with you as this potter does?” declares the LORD. “Behold, like the clay in the potter’s hand, so are you in My hand, house of Israel. 7At one moment I might speak concerning a nation or concerning a kingdom to uproot it, to tear it down, or to destroy it; 8if that nation against which I have spoken turns from its evil, I will relent of the disaster that I planned to bring on it. 9Or at another moment I might speak concerning a nation or concerning a kingdom to build up or to plant it; 10if it does evil in My sight by not obeying My voice, then I will relent of the good with which I said [a]that I would bless it.
Sure sounds like sovereignty to me, predicated upon both justice and mercy.
 
Feel free to expound upon it, but Romans 9 deals largely with the sovereignty of God in the affairs of man.

No one is arguing against the sovereignty of God.

It is your concept that remain nebulous to us...
Yet you see no need to show reason for why it pertained to the sovereignty of God.


It is the sovereignty of God that keeps alive those who abuse the concept like you have been doing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cv5
Here is what is revealed in NT concerning God imputing righteousness to Abraham as shown in Gen 15:6.

Romans 4:3 For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness.

and what is revealed in NT concerning faith:

Romans 4:4-5

4 Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt.

5 But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness.

Those who claim that believing is "works" are in error.

Those who claim that "faith" was imputed to Abraham before he believed have yet to provide the verse showing what they claim.

Those who claim the only path natural man can take when God reveals Himself is the path of hate, rejection, hearing the gospel message as foolishness are the ones who have not considered the fullness of Scripture.

Hebrews 11:8 By faith Abraham, when he was called to go out into a place which he should after receive for an inheritance, obeyed; and he went out, not knowing whither he went.

Like I said in Post 18,702 ... Abraham left Ur of the Chaldees by faith when God called him in Gen 12.

But Abraham did not believe the promise of God that he would be a great nation. Abraham did not believe that promise until Gen 15 ... which was years later. And it is when Abraham believed this promise that Abraham was counted righteous.
.
You missed the point. The NT clearly shows that faith is the result of hearing, and hearing is the result of the word of God. That's true of every believer, OT or NT. Abraham's wasn't born again by his faith; rather, he was born again by the word of God. His faith merely evidenced that he was already born of God. Everyone born again has imputed righteousness.
Paul is employing the example of Abraham in Romans 4 to demonstrate that salvation has always been by faith, and not the law, to his Jewish audience.
 
No one is arguing against the sovereignty of God.

It is your concept that remain nebulous to us...
Yet you see no need to show reason for why it pertained to the sovereignty of God.


It is the sovereignty of God that keeps alive those who abuse the concept like you have been doing.
God choosing Jacob but not Esau before they were born exemplifies the sovereignty of God.
God choosing to show mercy or not exemplifies the sovereignty of God.
God making 1 vessel to honor and another to destruction exemplifies the sovereignty of God.
Some were saying that the theme of sovereignty was not the major emphasis of Romans 9. I disagree.
 
God choosing Jacob but not Esau before they were born exemplifies the sovereignty of God.

What it shows was that God was not seeking works.
That God is seeking and knowing the inner workings of how a person wishes to think.

God saved Jacob, because God searched his heart, and found Jacob wanting to be with God.
God hated Esau, because God saw in Esau's heart the desire to listen to and follow the thinking of the god of this world.

God is not waiting for us to believe to save us.
God is waiting for us to see for ourselves that we believe.
 
What it shows was that God was not seeking works.
That God is seeking and knowing the inner workings of how a person wishes to think.

God saved Jacob, because God searched his heart, and found Jacob wanting to be with God.
God hated Esau, because God saw in Esau's heart the desire to listen to and follow the thinking of the god of this world.

God is not waiting for us to believe to save us.
God is waiting for us to see for ourselves that we believe.
This is not in the text. No where in Romans 9 does it state God is responding to the contents of men's hearts. In direct contrast to this, Paul uses the example of Jacob and Esau before they are even born...before they ever had a desire one way or the other.
 
This is not in the text. No where in Romans 9 does it state God is responding to the contents of men's hearts. In direct contrast
to this, Paul uses the example of Jacob and Esau before they are even born...before they ever had a desire one way or the other.
Romans9-11-13.png

Romans 9 verses 11-13 ~ Before the twins were born or had done anything good or bad, in order that God’s plan of election might stand, not by works but by Him who calls, she (Rebekah) was told, “The older will serve the younger.” So it is written: “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cameron143
Yes he did Mem. Some have to use analogies that have nothing to do with accepting or rejecting the Gospel in order to justify their beliefs. So be it.

God's sovereign choice in the matter is what He chooses to do with those who accept. He chose to give life hence, Lazarus was raised.
:D
John 11:25
Jesus said to her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believes in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live:
 
  • Like
Reactions: sawdust
If Scripture taught the following about man:
  • loves light rather than darkness
  • can come to God on his own FW
  • is not a slave to sin
  • is by nature a child of God
  • is not blinded by Satan
  • is saved by works
Then the FWers and the Reformed would be in total agreement

The Fwers, because that's really what they would like to hear anyway
And the Reformed would agree because it was the word of God.
 
You missed the point. The NT clearly shows that faith is the result of hearing, and hearing is the result of the word of God. That's true of every believer, OT or NT. Abraham's wasn't born again by his faith; rather, he was born again by the word of God. His faith merely evidenced that he was already born of God. Everyone born again has imputed righteousness.
Paul is employing the example of Abraham in Romans 4 to demonstrate that salvation has always been by faith, and not the law, to his Jewish audience.
Perhaps it ought to be said who actually hears, since free willers have been known to say that everyone hears, even though that very much directly contradicts what Jesus said. Of course we know free willers have a terrible habit of contradicting and denying Bible verses, even when it is the words of our Lord they mangle and butcher and sometimes rewrite to suit their vain self-exalting theology.
 
If Scripture taught the following about man:
  • loves light rather than darkness
  • can come to God on his own FW
  • is not a slave to sin
  • is by nature a child of God
  • is not blinded by Satan
  • is saved by works
Then the FWers and the Reformed would be in total agreement

The Fwers, because that's really what they would like to hear anyway
And the Reformed would agree because it was the word of God.
So true BillyBob! And good day... :D

dvsg.png

Man’s heart is deceitful above all things and incurable (Jer 17 v 9), himself full of evil (Mark 7 v 21-23), loves darkness rather than light (John 3 v 19), cannot come to God on his own (John 6 v 44), does not seek for God (Rom 3 v 10-12), is helpless and ungodly (Rom 5 v 6), nothing good dwells in his flesh (Rom 7 v 18), is a slave of sin (Rom 6 v 20, John 8 v 34, 2 Tim 2 v 26), cannot receive spiritual things (1 Cor 2 v 14), is dead in his sins (Eph 2 v 1), is by nature a child of wrath (Eph 2 v 3), is at enmity with God (Eph 2 v 15), hostile to God and cannot submit to God's law (Rom 8 v 7), blinded by Satan (2 Cor 4 v 4), hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his evil deeds will be exposed (John 3 v 20). Therefore we rightfully conclude in accordance with the conditions described of the unregenerated man in Scripture that his inborn inclination is to reject God. Thanks be to God, Who appoints people to believe (Acts 13 v 48), chooses who is to be holy and blameless (Eph 1 v 4), predestines us to adoption (Eph 1 v 5), calls according to His purpose (2 Tim 1 v 9), chooses us for salvation (2 Thes 2 v 13), leads us to and grants us repentance (Rom 2 v 4, 2 Tim 2 v 24-25), grants the act of believing (Phil 1 v 29), works faith in the believer (John 6 v 28-29), causes us to be born again (1 Pet 1 v 3), born again not by our will, effort or desire but by His will and desire (John 1 v 12-13), grants that we come to Jesus (John 6 v 65), draws people to Himself (John 6 v 44), predestines us to salvation (Rom 8 v 29-30), and circumcises our heart (with the heart one believes [Rom 10 v 10]) as promised in Deut 30 v 6, all according to His purpose (Phil 2 v 13). The stony ground of man’s wicked heart is not good soil. A bad tree cannot bring forth good fruit. Jesus said so! (Matt 7 v 18 + 12 v 33; Luke 6 v 43). All this and more weighed against zero verses articulating the so-called “free will” of the natural man, which is a vain man-exalting philosophically based doctrine erroneously and egregiously elevated to Bible truth. Praise God and to His glory, what is impossible with man is possible with God.
 
If Scripture taught the following about man:
  • loves light rather than darkness
  • can come to God on his own FW
  • is not a slave to sin
  • is by nature a child of God
  • is not blinded by Satan
  • is saved by works
Then the FWers and the Reformed would be in total agreement

The Fwers, because that's really what they would like to hear anyway
And the Reformed would agree because it was the word of God.

You forgot to add grace into the mix.

Grace changes everything.

:D
 
  • Like
Reactions: cv5
God choosing Jacob but not Esau before they were born exemplifies the sovereignty of God.
God choosing to show mercy or not exemplifies the sovereignty of God.
God making 1 vessel to honor and another to destruction exemplifies the sovereignty of God.
Some were saying that the theme of sovereignty was not the major emphasis of Romans 9. I disagree.
Nope. You've got that all wrong. What you opine are kindergarten toddler myths long dispelled as infantile.

Unfortunately you flunked out on the Romans 9 course too little buddy. Several times already.
This failure despite PhD level lectures already being provided for correction and education. Several times.

You just are not packing the gear little buddy. And you aren't the only one.
 
Perhaps it ought to be said who actually hears, since free willers have been known to say that everyone hears, even though that very much directly contradicts what Jesus said. Of course we know free willers have a terrible habit of contradicting and denying Bible verses, even when it is the words of our Lord they mangle and butcher and sometimes rewrite to suit their vain self-exalting theology.
Tell us again how God anesthetized Adam, surgically removed an actual rib bone, and grew Eve in a big test tube.
 
Nope. You've got that all wrong. What you opine are kindergarten toddler myths long dispelled as infantile.

Unfortunately you flunked out on the Romans 9 course too little buddy. Several times already.
This failure despite PhD level lectures already being provided for correction and education. Several times.

You just are not packing the gear little buddy. And you aren't the only one.
More gobbledygook.
 
God saved Jacob, because God searched his heart, and found Jacob wanting to be with God.
God hated Esau, because God saw in Esau's heart the desire to listen to and follow the thinking of the god of this world.
AND. The context is not individual salvation. It is the birth right and the worldly blessing that came along with it. Esau lost out on these blessings, NEVER to regain them. For a nation.

I contend that Esau was arguably saved, but lost blessings. And they(blessings) were without repentance.

As long as we draw breath we can be saved by grace through faith.
 
AND. The context is not individual salvation. It is the birth right and the worldly blessing that came along with it. Esau lost out on these blessings, NEVER to regain them. For a nation.

I contend that Esau was arguably saved, but lost blessings. And they(blessings) were without repentance.

As long as we draw breath we can be saved by grace through faith.
Agree, Esau was likely saved. King Saul definitely.