Can We Really Exercise Free Will?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Just asking because I have only read replies talking about WORKS [{(after)}] God leading them to Salvation.

Yes, and that is how I meant it - works after and from salvation, not before. Salvation was a result solely of Christ's works - the works of a Savior, not my works. My works are the works of the saved, not the works of the Savior.
But not sure how you meant "God leading them to salvation". God doesn't lead to salvation - God does the saving, entirely.
So, I may have misunderstood your post.
 
So a child is trusting themselves when they trust in their parent to take care of them, yes that makes sense. :rolleyes:
When you receive the gift-promise, where does your trust then lie? Not with yourself that's for sure. You put your faith and trust in the fidelity of the Giver.
 
Yes, and that is how I meant it - works after and from salvation, not before. Salvation was a result solely of Christ's works - the works of a Savior, not my works. My works are the works of the saved, not the works of the Savior.
But not sure how you meant "God leading them to salvation". God doesn't lead to salvation - God does the saving, entirely.
So, I may have misunderstood your post.
The verse on God’s drawing to salvation is John 6 v 44 where Jesus declares that “no one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him, and I will raise him up at the last day.” The Greek word translated “draw” is helkuo, which means “to drag” (literally or figuratively). [He draws us with loving kindness that we may repent.] Clearly, this drawing is a one-sided affair. God does the drawing to salvation; we who are drawn have a passive role in the process. There is no doubt that we respond to His drawing us, but the drawing itself is all on His part. (from GQ) So much for divine intervention not being needed at all. And so much for God not acting unilaterally in matters of salvation. The free will camp is washed out. They have the man who is a slave to sin and opposed to the things of God deciding with no help from God at all choosing to walk into the light which he hates as a lover of darkness and slave to sin. The free willer essentially claims these truths about the unregenerated man are not true. According to them, he can receive and comprehend the spiritual things of God even though Scripture says he cannot. According to them, he can summit to and obey God even though Scripture says he cannot.
 
Yes, and that is how I meant it - works after and from salvation, not before. Salvation was a result solely of Christ's works - the works of a Savior, not my works. My works are the works of the saved, not the works of the Savior.
But not sure how you meant "God leading them to salvation". God doesn't lead to salvation - God does the saving, entirely.
So, I may have misunderstood your post.
Magenta partially answered my meaning with John 6:44.

Even though Magenta is using a 3rd version definition we know that a person has to decide to go to Church to hear the Gospel preached. We know once that person hears the Gospel they choose to go to the altar and pray. Nowhere did God come to that person and physically drag that person to Church and then to the altar.

This is why I use the word God leads because we feel the drawing and we follow. That is not nor ever will be physically dragged. That's a Rapture definition.
 
The verse on God’s drawing to salvation is John 6 v 44 where Jesus declares that “no one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him, and I will raise him up at the last day.” The Greek word translated “draw” is helkuo, which means “to drag” (literally or figuratively). [He draws us with loving kindness that we may repent.] Clearly, this drawing is a one-sided affair. God does the drawing to salvation; we who are drawn have a passive role in the process. There is no doubt that we respond to His drawing us, but the drawing itself is all on His part. (from GQ) So much for divine intervention not being needed at all. And so much for God not acting unilaterally in matters of salvation. The free will camp is washed out. They have the man who is a slave to sin and opposed to the things of God deciding with no help from God at all choosing to walk into the light which he hates as a lover of darkness and slave to sin. The free willer essentially claims these truths about the unregenerated man are not true. According to them, he can receive and comprehend the spiritual things of God even though Scripture says he cannot. According to them, he can summit to and obey God even though Scripture says he cannot.
Candy coating the core determinist "pre-birth sovereign lottery" dogma with Christian sounding sprinkles again are we?

That psy-op is called "cooling off the mark" just to let you know ....
 
The verse on God’s drawing to salvation is John 6 v 44 where Jesus declares that “no one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him, and I will raise him up at the last day.” The Greek word translated “draw” is helkuo, which means “to drag” (literally or figuratively). [He draws us with loving kindness that we may repent.] Clearly, this drawing is a one-sided affair. God does the drawing to salvation; we who are drawn have a passive role in the process. There is no doubt that we respond to His drawing us, but the drawing itself is all on His part. (from GQ) So much for divine intervention not being needed at all. And so much for God not acting unilaterally in matters of salvation. The free will camp is washed out. They have the man who is a slave to sin and opposed to the things of God deciding with no help from God at all choosing to walk into the light which he hates as a lover of darkness and slave to sin. The free willer essentially claims these truths about the unregenerated man are not true. According to them, he can receive and comprehend the spiritual things of God even though Scripture says he cannot. According to them, he can summit to and obey God even though Scripture says he cannot.
You provided a sophomoric one word study from one verse, then backed it up with several paragraphs of your own opinions.

This effort does NOT constitute trustworthy sound doctrine.
 
Magenta said:
Total hypocrite. FWers use their freedom to sin.
hah! ... under that surmising, you could consider yourself a"total hypocrite" and a "FWer" ... hahahaha!!!

1 John 1:8, 10 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. ... If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.
.
Yep.
Said the quiet part out loud.
 
Magenta partially answered my meaning with John 6:44.

Even though Magenta is using a 3rd version definition we know that a person has to decide to go to Church to hear the Gospel preached. We know once that person hears the Gospel they choose to go to the altar and pray. Nowhere did God come to that person and physically drag that person to Church and then to the altar.

This is why I use the word God leads because we feel the drawing and we follow. That is not nor ever will be physically dragged. That's a Rapture definition.
Eh? I quoted a source and gave it, I guess your blindness extends to that also. Plus, nobody decides to hear. Are you one of the ones who says God would not command things people cannot do? Are you going to tell us how you circumcised your ears so you could hear? Because the gospel message is foolishness to the unregenerated. Just one of those many many many things Scripture explicitly articulates that FWers deny. Please also tell us how you circumcised your heart, also. Thanks. Oh, just to clarify, the part I said was that God draws us with loving kindness that we may repent. Did you miss that too?

And free willers have no verses articulating what they believe. It is all
their imagination, conflation and opinion. IOW, self-exalting vanity.
 
Eh? I quoted a source and gave it, I guess your blindness extends to that also. Plus, nobody decides to hear. Are you one of the ones who says God would not command things people cannot do? Are you going to tell us how you circumcised your ears so you could hear? Because the gospel message is foolishness to the unregenerated. Just one of those many many many things Scripture explicitly articulates that FWers deny. Please also tell us how you circumcised your heart, also. Thanks. Oh, just to clarify, the part I said was that God draws us with loving kindness that we may repent. Did you miss that too?

And free willers have no verses articulating what they believe. It is all
their imagination, conflation and opinion. IOW, self-exalting vanity.
I was born into a family that goes back to the ancient Hebrew Jew so I would have always been informed and taught about God.

Then it just so happens that a few generations prior to my own birth my family were saved and accepted Jesus Christ as their personal Lord God and Savior.

I was always destined to know about God because of my family and the fact God chose and elected my ancient ancestors.
 
seekandsave.png

Jesus answered, “It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick.” Luke 5 v 31 The Son of Man came to seek and to save the lost. Luke 19 v 10 For the Son of Man came to save the lost. Matthew 18 v 11 I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners. Matthew 9 v 13b, Mark 2 v 17b I will seek the lost, bring back the strays, bind up the broken, and strengthen the weak; but the sleek and strong I will destroy. Ezekiel 34 v 1 6

The "sleek and strong" sound an awful lot like FWers. BEFORE they make their "freewill" decision to believe and repent of their sins, they don't need a new heart, a circumcised heart, the fear of the Lord instilled into them or to be raised from the dead. Those FWers are surely "sleek and strong" -- so they think in their hearts.
 
so if God never acts unilaterally in matters of salvation what exactly do they mean by that ?

I know it's only Gods choice, and that's what unilaterally mean doesn't it , it means one persons choice, something done by one person ?

You mean like the unilateral promises of the New Covenant by which God alone fulfills those promises!? And this is why the NC is very much unlike the Old!
 
But he hadn't been regenerated yet.

You're assuming that! Besides, Cornelius was gifted by God's grace of the Fear of the Lord which is a New Covenant promise made to God's covenant people. So...it certainly appears that this Gentile somehow inherited a covenant promise that was made only to God's covenant people ISRAEL! How do you explain this?
 
no he never asked it for it no.

That was given against his will.

Which means a persons own will is very limited when it comes to God.

So nice scripture btw, I've read them a lot in the past, I used to do challenges when I was kid growing up, of how fast I could break a record in reading a whole book without having to stop to understand it, it's amazing really a 500 page book that takes you 2 weeks to fully read can be done in just 3 days,

It's mainly done by the understanding the character and characters, God's main character is all about leading people with his will.

Like the slaves of egypt scared to leave Egypt because there own will said otherwise.

So God drove the slaves out by having them chased by the Egyptians as the slaves where never going to go through the parted waters, the open door to heaven by themselves

What!? God didn't ask Paul for his permission first!? FWers will be aghast! :rolleyes:
 
The "sleek and strong" sound an awful lot like FWers. BEFORE they make their "freewill" decision to believe and repent of their sins, they don't need a new heart, a circumcised heart, the fear of the Lord instilled into them or to be raised from the dead. Those FWers are surely "sleek and strong" -- so they think in their hearts.
Yes... they believe they have outsmarted God because God claims to have confounded the wise. FWers are certainly wise in their own eyes, to make such a good moral decision especially when Scripture proclaims the unregenerated are unable to do the things they claim he can, like bring forth fruit unto life from their flesh while serving the law of sin and refusing to come into the light as a slave to sin and lover of darkness.

As a follow-up to what one of our many dishonest FWers claimed, Helkuo is also used in John 21:6 to refer to a heavy net full of fish being dragged to the shore. In John 18:10 we see Peter drawing his sword, and in Acts 16:19 helkuo is used to describe Paul and Silas being dragged into the marketplace before the rulers. Clearly, the net had no part in its being drawn to the shore, Peter’s sword had no part in being drawn, and Paul and Silas did not drag themselves to the marketplace. The same can be said of God’s drawing of some to salvation. Some come willingly, and some are dragged unwillingly, but all eventually come, although we have no part in the drawing.

The term is most notably used in the Bible to express the concept of God drawing people to Himself.

One might wonder why a FWer would lie about such a thing but it becomes so
obvious that dishonesty comes so easily to them it may as well be their name.


Lexical Summary
helkó: To draw, to drag
Original Word: ἕλκω
Part of Speech: Verb
Transliteration: helkó
Pronunciation: HEL-ko
Phonetic Spelling: (hel-koo'-o)
KJV: draw
NASB: dragged, drew, drag, draw, draws, haul
Word Origin: [probably akin to G138 (αἱρέομαι - choose)]


1. to drag
{literally or figuratively}
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rufus
But what would have happened if the lord didn't cloth them.

Without being loved what happens to a person who isn't living very well.
Without the name that's considered a name for the living like eve, how can you feel like living.

Did eve think her punishment had been taken away because Adam called her eve the mother of living.

Was eves spiritual existence totally secure the moment she was called eve.

Well it may have been but God coupled have looked at her whole life first spent with God . Is that a possibility 🤔

Eve's eternal spiritual existence was made certain and secure the moment God made His decree about her to the Serpent (Gen 3:15); for the decree clearly implies that God reconciled Eve unto Himself the moment he decreed the enmity between her and the Serpent.
 
What!? God didn't ask Paul for his permission first!? FWers will be aghast! :rolleyes:
Some already call God an unjust tyrannical monster kidnapping people against their free will, and disgustingly enough, a rapist,
though definitely these things are just their vile blasphemous opinions, for which they will have to give an account some day.