Charlie Kirk - so what now ?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Status
Not open for further replies.
The "official narrative" is falling apart rather quickly.
The shot came from behind and he was buried with no autopsy, wonder why?
As far as I am concerned the official narrative has been completely discredited.
 
Yeah, I don't get that. What's so scary about him?

Trump is unpredictable, but within a predictable framework. The VP is unpredictable in a way that even the universe cant control the ramifications of.

That’s pretty much why…
 
Sounds good.

You stay over here:

I'm over here:

You sound a bit like Gus Cannon parodying Booker T. Washington…

Now Booker T. he left Tuskegee
To the White House he went one day
He was going to call on the president
In a quiet and a sociable way
Was in his car
A'was feeling fine
 
  • Like
Reactions: Eli1
Trump is unpredictable, but within a predictable framework. The VP is unpredictable in a way that even the universe cant control the ramifications of.

That’s pretty much why…
Oh I think Vance is very predicatble.

As is trump

they say what they say, and then carry it out. Unlike the last president
 
this statement is based on theory not fact.

it is that the police and government are failing in their duty to investigate this properly and thoroughly.?
This statement is based on the contradictory evidence appearing to come from the government. The claim that the shooter on the roof was Tyler, although the footage revealed doesn't support this, doesn't show the figure on the roof fire a weapon (which would have been caught on the same camera if a rifle was fired), doesn't support that the rifle in question was ever on the roof, clearly shows there was insufficient time for the gun to have been folded away (which is being given as the excuse for why the rifle can't be seen in the footage). The (incomplete) text messages which were released without timestamps and which use language more aligned to the military or police than used by young people, the false story released by the media about Tyler confessing to the crime... I'm not saying the guy is not guilty, but there are holes and holes and holes in the story released. Truth doesn't come with so many holes, and I haven't even listed them all.

should the same group that was demonstrably compromised during the January 6 "insurrection" false flag
Do you deny the fact that 274 undercover FBI officers were present during the January 6 "insurrection"? And that this fact was only forthcoming recently, some 4 - 5 years after the event? To me, this smacks of corruption and lack of accountability for an organisation which is supposed to demonstrate exactly the opposite. I believe a secret police force is exactly what we don't need.

and for not holding Epstein pedophiles to account (amongst many other examples) have any role in investigations until the corruption which permitted it to commit the aforementioned crimes is routed out?
Unless you're arguing that Epstein was innocent and the first court which found him guilty got it wrong, or that secret trials were held for his clients who he trafficked sex slaves to, I'm not sure what your point is here. Guilty people, who should have been investigated, went free, and the people haven't been given adequate answers as to why.
 
The last president did that too. He said nothing and carried out nothing.
Your right, That was Biden.

I put trump in office because he promised to do many things.

Unlike the last president, Trump has fulfilled pretty much everything he said that I myself wanted. and the rest, He is still trying.
 
This statement is based on the contradictory evidence appearing to come from the government.
Which is conspiracy

The claim that the shooter on the roof was Tyler, although the footage revealed doesn't support this, doesn't show the figure on the roof fire a weapon (which would have been caught on the same camera if a rifle was fired), doesn't support that the rifle in question was ever on the roof, clearly shows there was insufficient time for the gun to have been folded away (which is being given as the excuse for why the rifle can't be seen in the footage). The (incomplete) text messages which were released without timestamps and which use language more aligned to the military or police than used by young people, the false story released by the media about Tyler confessing to the crime... I'm not saying the guy is not guilty, but there are holes and holes and holes in the story released. Truth doesn't come with so many holes, and I haven't even listed them all.
Again conspiracy,, not based on fact

Do you deny the fact that 274 undercover FBI officers were present during the January 6 "insurrection"? And that this fact was only forthcoming recently, some 4 - 5 years after the event? To me, this smacks of corruption and lack of accountability for an organisation which is supposed to demonstrate exactly the opposite. I believe a secret police force is exactly what we don't need.
yes. I do agree. and who asked them to be there? Trump? they were there to make it appear there was an insurrection when there was not..

Unless you're arguing that Epstein was innocent and the first court which found him guilty got it wrong, or that secret trials were held for his clients who he trafficked sex slaves to, I'm not sure what your point is here. Guilty people, who should have been investigated, went free, and the people haven't been given adequate answers as to why.
I am not arguing anything about epstien.. Until I know the fact. everything about what he did or did not do and about why the documents are not released are hearsay and not based on fact.
 
Your right, That was Biden.

I put trump in office because he promised to do many things.

Unlike the last president, Trump has fulfilled pretty much everything he said that I myself wanted. and the rest, He is still trying.

Yes, but it is not Trump I’m talking about in fear and agony, but the VP.
 
Which is conspiracy


Again conspiracy,, not based on fact
No, it's not. I've seen the videos. I've heard and read the accounts. The "official narrative", at least up until the present, does not make sense. It is self contradictory and internally inconsistent.

yes. I do agree. and who asked them to be there? Trump? they were there to make it appear there was an insurrection when there was not..
I don't care who asked them to be there. They were there, they should not have been, and it took 4 or 5 years to admit it. It's a secret police force, and I'd argue should not be trusted at least until all those involved are routed out and put on trial.

I am not arguing anything about epstien.. Until I know the fact. everything about what he did or did not do and about why the documents are not released are hearsay and not based on fact.
Probably no point engaging, then, for another few years, until most of the facts are known. My aim is to expose the lies as they occur in real time in order to possibly affect the outcome in a positive way for truth and justice. I do understand others would prefer the complete narrative to be spoon fed to them once the government has got it figured out, but the government are a long way from that at present.
 
My aim is to expose the lies as they occur in real time in order to possibly affect the outcome in a positive way for truth and justice.

Thanks for your efforts.
The red wave is happening in real time despite your efforts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doll
No, it's not. I've seen the videos. I've heard and read the accounts. The "official narrative", at least up until the present, does not make sense. It is self contradictory and internally inconsistent.

I don't care who asked them to be there. They were there, they should not have been, and it took 4 or 5 years to admit it. It's a secret police force, and I'd argue should not be trusted at least until all those involved are routed out and put on trial.

Probably no point engaging, then, for another few years, until most of the facts are known. My aim is to expose the lies as they occur in real time in order to possibly affect the outcome in a positive way for truth and justice. I do understand others would prefer the complete narrative to be spoon fed to them once the government has got it figured out, but the government are a long way from that at present.
I have seen videos too.. I have also seen alot of other stuff.

The secret police force has been run by the left. Trump is trying to demolish them, yet your saying this is a conspiracy.

Stop listening to fake news
 
  • Like
Reactions: Doll and Eli1
Fireing Squad is the outcome. After 30 years of lawyers making money from appeals and several thousand dollars spent feeding this animal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.