I doubt you'll get any takers Brother. She's pretty mean, lol.
Funny coming from the guy who says can't means can.You’ve redefined half the dictionary and all the rules of logic—but at least you recognized in one brief moment of wisdom the need for faithful brothers to help get you to the destination. We were born of the Firstborn Servant and are led by His Spirit. So yes, sit back. We’ll get you there.
No, but rather consider that Jesus offered (in good faith) the sop of fellowship to Judas at probably all four Passover suppers.Wow. Now it is your position that Christians should abandon truth. The sinking ship is the freewill ship. You won't be able to plug the holes by redefining words and emotional rants.
He did so knowing what would occur. Was Judas not going to fulfill prophecy?No, but rather consider that Jesus offered (in good faith) the sop of fellowship to Judas at probably all four Passover suppers.
While the host of angels looked down on the spectacle.
It is only man centered if created by man.
Traditional biblical, exegetical correct soteriology is not created by man, it is the logical and chronological plan of salvation given by God.
As already clearly presented.....
Acts 2:38: “Repent, and each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit” (NASB) [4].
God cannot perform the act of regeneration (an act of sanctification) in a person before he or she is justified.
God moves in with His sanctifying grace only after the guilt problem is satisfied by justification.
To argue otherwise is to violate the law of non-contradiction.
(a proposition and its negation cannot both be true at the same time and in the same sense)
The logical order cannot be violated even by your feeble attempts to divide separate regeneration and life.
Seriously this dogma is horrible apposed to God's sovereign plan.
Best you abandon this sinking ship where sovereignty is not even remotely, correctly understood.
Funny coming from the guy who says can't means can.
Wow. Now it is your position that Christians should abandon truth. The sinking ship is the freewill ship. You won't be able to plug the holes by redefining words and emotional rants.
You mean here?
You're becoming more like your boat buddy.
- Clause 1: The soulish man willfully refuses the Spirit’s teaching.
- Clause 2 (gar = “for”): His reason is that he considers it to be nonsense.
- Clause 3 (kai = “and so”): The result of this judgment is that he cannot truly know it.
- Clause 4 (hoti = “because”): The deeper reason for his inability is that these truths require spiritual discernment.
Funny coming from the guy who says can't means can.
You started well. The first 2 points are correct. The natural man believes the the things of the Spirit of God are foolishness; hence He will not receive them. You begin err after that. You attribute not knowing to believing the things of God are foolishness. The verse attributes not knowing to the fact that the things of God are spiritually discerned. You draw a conclusion that scripture does not, likely to prop up your man-centered ideology.You mean here?
You're becoming more like your boat buddy.
- Clause 1: The soulish man willfully refuses the Spirit’s teaching.
- Clause 2 (gar = “for”): His reason is that he considers it to be nonsense.
- Clause 3 (kai = “and so”): The result of this judgment is that he cannot truly know it.
- Clause 4 (hoti = “because”): The deeper reason for his inability is that these truths require spiritual discernment.
There's no sense answering you. You can't even define terms properly.Of course the side step once again.
Hhhhmmmm interesting. Very familiar and consistent actually.![]()
cannot does not mean can
Wrong again. This MUST be categorized as a willful intentional attempt at promulgating a false teaching.The natural man believes the the things of the Spirit of God are foolishness; hence He will not receive them.
Well, that's the part where I agreed with @studier , so he'll be glad to know you believe he is wrong.Wrong again. This MUST be categorized as a willful intentional attempt at promulgating a false teaching.
Why can't God!? God's elect were fully justified in His eyes in eternity when he chose the elect in Christ! You seem to forget that God's grace was given to the elect before the beginning of time (2Tim 1:9)...AND that the elect are also justified by that grace (Rom 3:23-24).
Since God alone gives understanding, then it takes the Holy Spirit to efficaciously open a sinner's HEART in order to discern.
Hhhhmmmm interesting. Very familiar and consistent actually.
Jhn 14:17
Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, ***because*** it seeth G2334 him G846 not, G3756 (CONSEQUENTLY) neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you.
2334 theōréō (from 2300 /theáomai, "to gaze, contemplate") – gaze on for the purpose of analyzing (discriminating).
And who in Israel did not "see" Jesus and His mighty works? Evidently, turning your back rather than gazing upon/analyzing/contemplating Jesus has its consequences. Sounds much like the bronze serpent event.
Num 21:9
So Moses made a bronze serpent, and put it on a pole; and so it was, if a serpent had bitten anyone, when he looked at the bronze serpent, he lived.