Can We Really Exercise Free Will?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
You should lie down. You are starting to become delusional.
We, the Victors in battle aren't the ones laying on the ground buddy.

You determinists are getting you clock cleaned by team volition.

It never really was much of a challenge as your weapons of debate consist mainly of whining, childish rants, embarrassing attempts at exegesis and infantile absurdities.

For example, on two separate occasions, @Magenta butchered/fractionated two standalone verses, then promptly erected two different bogus doctrines from them.

Did you want me to retrieve the posts?
 
  • Like
Reactions: HeIsHere
We, the Victors in battle aren't the ones laying on the ground buddy.

You determinists are getting you clock cleaned by team volition.

It never really was much of a challenge as your weapons of debate consist mainly of whining, childish rants, embarrassing attempts at exegesis and infantile absurdities.

For example, on two separate occasions, @Magenta butchered/fractionated two standalone verses, then promptly erected two different bogus doctrines from them.

Did you want me to retrieve the posts?
It's worse than I thought. You have totally melted down. Don't worry, med cart is on the way.
 
descend to the most vile attacks.
I wonder what you call vile, since even your friend saying God raped Mary you did not condemn, but supported him.

Same person saying God acting unilaterally makes Him an unjust tyrannical
monster kidnapping people against their free will. What did you do? Applaud.


We may really need a med vac after that...
 
Just getting started... Thought you'd enjoy some other ilk & a known scholar saying "This text has been most pitifully misunderstood"

If you understood/believed the Bible's foundational doctrine, you wouldn't really need to use a scholar, as over time,
of themselves, the pieces would fall into place behind it. Everything in scripture was built upon, cannot contradict, and is mutually supporting, of that doctrine.
 
Agree, there is no debate, and your presentation of this should have ended the thread, but what can they do, they have to save face, and descend to the most vile attacks.

I remember when there were pastors/churches which where not infected with this nonsense soteriology and held to the traditional plan.

It is very troubling when the simple plan of salvation has become corrupted .. for the appalling wait and see lottery selection process.
Responding positively to the personal GOOD NEWS of God's love and sacrifice......nope, not possible, here are the verses I have pulled out from any context which show the door is closed to you until God activates you, because your positive response is a work even if you could do it.

I find this so disgusting.

Numbers 21:6-9 (see also John 3:14)
The LORD sent fiery serpents among the people and they bit the people, so that many people of Israel died. So the people came to Moses and said, “We have sinned, because we have spoken against the LORD and you; intercede with the LORD, that He may remove the serpents from us.” And Moses interceded for the people. Then the LORD said to Moses, “Make a fiery serpent, and set it on a standard; and it shall come about, that everyone who is bitten, when he looks at it, he will live.” And Moses made a bronze serpent and set it on the standard; and it came about, that if a serpent bit any man, when he looked to the bronze serpent, he lived.

Dave Hunt a great man of the correct soteriology states:

Dave Hunt:

“The healing from the poisonous snakebite was not for a select group within Israel whom God had predestined to be healed, but for ‘everyone...any man.’ The only limitation was to look in faith to the upraised serpent.

Likewise, everyone who has been bitten by ‘that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan’ (Revelation 12:9) is healed if they will but look in faith to Christ lifted up on the Cross.” (What Love is This?, pp.259-260)

ROFL! :ROFL::ROFL::ROFL: Lady, I hate to burst your bubble over your [so-called] "great man of the correct soteriology" but this Hunt fella doesn't read too swell. As I have pointed out on multiple occasions, the bronze serpent incident actually supports Reformed Theology very well, thank you. What you and your bud Hunt can't or don't want to see is there were 2 groups of Israelites involved in God's judgment of the serpent's and that He let the first group perish without ever offering them a remedy. But God spared the second group from being bitten until after divine remedy was offered; for this was the elect group God would save.
 
It never really was much of a challenge as your weapons of debate consist mainly of whining, childish rants, embarrassing attempts at exegesis and infantile absurdities.

All in defense of a "gospel of Non-Reponsibilty"

Bible:

Luke 13:3—“I tell you, no; but unless you repent you will all likewise perish.”
 
I have not time at the moment but I will post the Greek analysis going into the clauses which refutes this.

If faith were a gift then it be plainly stated.
It is not.

John 3:14-15 (see also John 1:29; Numbers 21:6-9; 1st John 2:2; 2nd Corinthians 5:14-15)
As Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of Man be lifted up; so that whoever believes will in Him have eternal life.”

Not whoever is "gifted" belief.
Jesus intentionally codifies this correlation between Him (and the salvation He brings) and the bronze serpent episode.
Intending to TEACH a critical LESSON to the wise. This teaching/lesson being God breathed and therefore of "the THINGS of the Spirit of God."

And lo and behold......the Calvinists "RECEIVETH NOT" this teaching, as they consider it "FOOLISHNESS".
Absolutely CRICKETS from them, they have no answer.

So lets get this straight:
-receiveth not
-foolishness
-the things of the Spirit of God

Now where have we heard of this list of items on this thread? Oh I know......

1Co 2:14
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
 
ROFL! :ROFL::ROFL::ROFL: Lady, I hate to burst your bubble over your [so-called] "great man of the correct soteriology" but this Hunt fella doesn't read too swell. As I have pointed out on multiple occasions, the bronze serpent incident actually supports Reformed Theology very well, thank you. What you and your bud Hunt can't or don't want to see is there were 2 groups of Israelites involved in God's judgment of the serpent's and that He let the first group perish without ever offering them a remedy. But God spared the second group from being bitten until after divine remedy was offered; for this was the elect group God would save.

That is your god alright. :rolleyes:

The author of both good and evil, hate and love, in equal measure.

R. C. Sproul would be proud.

“God wills all things that come to pass…God desired for man to fall into sin. I am not accusing God of sinning; I am suggesting that God created sin.” R.C. Sproul Jr., Almighty Over All (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House, 1999), 54
 
Jesus intentionally codifies this correlation between Him (and the salvation He brings) and the bronze serpent episode.
Intending to TEACH a critical LESSON to the wise. This teaching/lesson being God breathed and therefore of "the THINGS of the Spirit of God."

And lo and behold......the Calvinists "RECEIVETH NOT" this teaching, as they consider it "FOOLISHNESS".
Absolutely CRICKETS from them, they have no answer.

So lets get this straight:
-receiveth not
-foolishness
-the things of the Spirit of God

Now where have we heard of this list of items on this thread? Oh I know......

1Co 2:14
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

Yes, I have been thinking how so very ironic this is, considering their pet proof text (out of context).
 
All in defense of a "gospel of Non-Reponsibilty"
And a gospel of non-accountability, one of no justice, and no rewards as there is no overcoming to worry about either.
Or pretty much anything else that God holds critical and important.
 
ROFL! :ROFL::ROFL::ROFL: Lady, I hate to burst your bubble over your [so-called] "great man of the correct soteriology" but this Hunt fella doesn't read too swell. As I have pointed out on multiple occasions, the bronze serpent incident actually supports Reformed Theology very well, thank you. What you and your bud Hunt can't or don't want to see is there were 2 groups of Israelites involved in God's judgment of the serpent's and that He let the first group perish without ever offering them a remedy. But God spared the second group from being bitten until after divine remedy was offered; for this was the elect group God would save.
God sent the snakes among them in the first place... I wonder what HeIsHere will say about God because of that.

She already thinks he is unfair, and applauds when another calls Him an unjust
tyrannical monster, and defended the same person when he called God a rapist.


It's inane, as if reformed theology doesn't include repentance. You did order the medi-vac, right?
Well, in the purposeful misrepresentations presented by free willers, pastors of the reformed
persuasion do not even preach the gospel on Sunday. I wonder what they think they do?
 
My sanity is not in question.
Yours? Filled with episodes of irrationality like this.....

"it (FAITH) results from the choice of man"
This is more of your dishonesty. It's why you don't post the entire post. It would show your deceit. Better up your dosage.
 
It's inane, as if reformed theology doesn't include repentance. You did order the medi-vac, right?

It does, it fits in perfectly with the Gospel of NON-Responsibilty.

III. Repentance Is a Gift From God

Last week we saw that saving faith is a gift of God, so we should not be surprised that repentance from sin, which is also essential to salvation, is a gift of God as well. We shall briefly consider three passages which teach this concept. The first comes from the defense of Peter before the Sanhedrin:
NKJ Acts 5:31 Him [the Lord Jesus] God has exalted to His right hand to be Prince and Savior, to give [δίδωμι, dídōmi] repentance [μετάνοια, metánoia] to Israel and forgiveness of sins.

The Baptist Churches have been taken over. :(

Reformed Baptist Blog -- SADLY