Random Questions; Bible-based answers

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
If anyone ever asked me if I believe the Bible is the inerrant Word of God, my reply would be, everything is the inerrant Word of God, otherwise it wouldn't exist. Nothing that is, is without Him. Whether anyone correctly translates and interprets the Bible is always up for debate.

Glad to meet you DM.
Here are my thoughts regarding Biblical inspiration from Lesson 10 of our website <truthseekersfellowship.com> :

Those who view the biblical canon as inspired by God disagree about what this means. Some people speak as though God dictated every word of the Bible to the human writers, which causes many folks to be confused, because they do not realize that the dictation theory has several caveats, such as that it refers to the original manuscripts (which we do not have) correctly interpreted. And the key to correct interpretation is NOT viewing the Bible as a modern science or history textbook, but rather as concerned with communicating God’s will to humanity regarding His requirement for salvation: THAT is what is inerrant!

The salvationist view of inspiration seems more logical than the dictationist view according to the following train of thought: Suppose God Himself wrote the inerrant message to humanity: “Thou shalt not lie, steal, murder or fornicate.” Suppose the first manuscript copier accidentally left out the comma between lie and steal. Would that invalidate God’s commandment? No, but it is still a mistake and no longer perfectly inerrant.

Now suppose an evil copier intentionally changed the word fornicate to fumigate. Would that invalidate God’s commandment? Not all of it; only the changed word. How could we know which word or words were correct and not changed? We would need to compare the commandment with other statements purported to be inspired by God in order to see what is the overall or consistent message, so that we can acquire sufficient evidence to have reasonable belief that the word fumigate should be discounted.

Finally, suppose that no one changed God’s original commandment. How could we know absolutely or infallibly that it was inerrant? We could not; we walk by faith. We would still need to compare it with the totality of truth in order to discover whether there were any inconsistencies. Thus, a completely inerrant Bible is not needed, as long as there is sufficient consistency in God’s messages to humanity via the creation (TOJ #4), the scriptures (TOJ #3), the incarnate word (TOJ #186) and logic (TOJ #182) for souls to discern God’s requirement for salvation.

Inspiration is like a river: God determines its banks so that the overall revelation each generation along its banks has includes truth sufficient regarding salvation (kerygma), but God allows the river of revelation to have eddies or discrepancies or minor errors that do not prevent God’s purpose from being accomplished (Isa. 55:10f, 1Pet. 1:10-12, Heb. 11:2-12:2). This topic will conclude by considering the claim of contradictions in the Bible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tourist
What is the purpose of the Holy Ghost today?

The Holy Spirit plays a vital role in the lives of believers, primarily guiding them towards truth, empowering them to live righteously, and offering comfort and strength. He also serves as a witness of Jesus Christ and a source of personal revelation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Suze
The Holy Spirit plays a vital role in the lives of believers, primarily guiding them towards truth, empowering them to live righteously, and offering comfort and strength. He also serves as a witness of Jesus Christ and a source of personal revelation.

No. The Holy Ghost. What is the function of the Holy Ghost today?
 
The Holy Spirit plays a vital role in the lives of believers, primarily guiding them towards truth, empowering them to live righteously, and offering comfort and strength. He also serves as a witness of Jesus Christ and a source of personal revelation.
HOLY SPIRIT DOVE - Copy (1).jpg Isaiah+6-8Here+Am+I++Send+Me+white - Copy.jpg
 
Acts Chapter 4: "And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost and began to speak with other tongues as the Spirit gave utterance."
What is the function of the Holy Ghost today?

Metaphor ...a figure of speech in which a word or phrase is applied to an object or action to which it is not literally applicable.
 
How can you read Acts 4 and still come away with that?

Spiritual Realism, Spiritual realism is a philosophical perspective that posits the existence of a spiritual reality alongside the physical world, emphasizing a connection between the two.

LOL. Did you tell God about this newfound discovery of your's? I think the Bible is pretty clear.?

No need to. Spiritual maturity is vacant in many, but contempt is surely alive and well with some.
God bless you on your quest for clarity. 2764 (1).png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Suze
Spiritual Realism, Spiritual realism is a philosophical perspective that posits the existence of a spiritual reality alongside the physical world, emphasizing a connection between the two.



No need to. Spiritual maturity is vacant in many, but contempt is surely alive and well with some.
God bless you on your quest for clarity. View attachment 278128
OK. My arrogance aside, and I apologize, but if I understand you, there is no difference between the Holy Spirit being poured out onto all mankind as described by the Prophet Joel and being filled with the Holy Ghost after baptism and evidenced by speaking in tongues? Both Spirit and Ghost have the same function? Simple verbiage is all?
 
OK. My arrogance aside, and I apologize, but if I understand you, there is no difference between the Holy Spirit being poured out onto all mankind as described by the Prophet Joel and being filled with the Holy Ghost after baptism and evidenced by speaking in tongues? Both Spirit and Ghost have the same function? Simple verbiage is all?

No, both terms "Ghost" and "Spirit" translate the same Greek word and thus there is no "both G & S" but rather "G = S".
(IOW, same nounage :^)
 
No, both terms "Ghost" and "Spirit" translate the same Greek word and thus there is no "both G & S" but rather "G = S".
(IOW, same nounage :^)

Why would God do that? Why not just use one or the other. God is not a God of confusion, but, that sounds confusing. And it has several churches confused.
 
Why would God do that? Why not just use one or the other. God is not a God of confusion, but, that sounds confusing. And it has several churches confused.

While God is not the author of confusion, He allows it, and how the extant Bible came to be produced is comparable to making sausage.
Because the KJ English is confusing to modern Americans, it would behoove churches to use a modern English version for starters.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tourist
Why would God do that? Why not just use one or the other. God is not a God of confusion, but, that sounds confusing. And it has several churches confused.
The issue is simply one of translation era. The King James version (1611) primarily uses “Holy Ghost” while modern translations (post 1900) primarily use “Holy Spirit”. The terms are synonymous, though “Spirit” is a better rendering given current usage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tourist
While God is not the author of confusion, He allows it, and how the extant Bible came to be produced is comparable to making sausage.
Because the KJ English is confusing to modern Americans, it would behoove churches to use a modern English version for starters.

I've always used the King James Version. The challenge causes diligence.
 
The issue is simply one of translation era. The King James version (1611) primarily uses “Holy Ghost” while modern translations (post 1900) primarily use “Holy Spirit”. The terms are synonymous, though “Spirit” is a better rendering given current usage.
But aren't we supposed to be baptized and filled with the Holy Ghost and then walk in the Spirit according to all the major translations? Is there a difference there?
 
I've always used the King James Version. The challenge causes diligence.

Yes, but it can also cause confusion. I liked the KJV, but I asked for a NEB the first Christmas after it came out and began reading
it and making notes in the margins. However, about halfway through the OT for some reason the binding was flawed and came unglued,
so it was replaced and I had to start from In the beginning again. Talk about needing diligence!
 
  • Like
Reactions: tourist
But aren't we supposed to be baptized and filled with the Holy Ghost and then walk in the Spirit according to all the major translations? Is there a difference there?

No, I think most modern translations use Spirit instead of Ghost in every verse,
(perhaps because "ghost" makes people think of Casper).