The Triage System of Dating -- What Happens When You're Put Behind a Gaggle of Other Candidates?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

seoulsearch

OutWrite Trouble
May 23, 2009
17,692
6,456
113
#1
Hey Everyone,

"Triage" is defined as: the process of examining problems in order to decide which are the most serious and must be dealt with first.

It's often used in medicine (deciding which patients need help first,) and business (deciding which problems need action first,) but I think it can be applied to dating as well.

A friend and I were talking about something we've observed on dating sites -- first of all, we all know that the men and women who are deemed most attractive/have the most desirable traits (looks, money, job, own a home, etc.) are going to get the most people messaging them.

So what happens when people have several options?

Let's say that Paul finds Sara attractive and sends her a message. Sara thinks Paul is a nice guy, but she also has messages from John, Bill, Frank, and Stan.

And so, Sara does a "triage" evaluation of all her options. She politely answers each of them, but early on, she knows that she is interested in John and Bill more than any of the others. She doesn't think she is compatible with Frank or Stan, so she allows communication with them to die down and eventually stop. Paul seems like a nice guy, but she doesn't feel feel especially attracted to him -- she has some contact with Paul, but it's very casual, infrequent, and also dies off.

About 2 months pass, and Sara has not talked with Paul at all during this time, because she's more interested in John and and Bill. Sara has spent all her time during these months trying to get to know them. However, things do not work out. John finally says he's not interested in her, and Sara realizes that she and Bill aren't really a match.

And so, after around 2 months of no communication, Sara decides to write Paul "out of the blue" to "see how he's doing."

In other words, her first choices didn't work out -- and so now, she's "working on down the list."

* How should Paul feel about this?

* Should he give her a chance, or keep moving? What would you do?

* What do you do when you know you're not a "first choice," but just an "alternative" who's further on down the list?

And on the flip side:

* If YOU were the one with several options, how would you handle it?

* Would you prioritize who you liked best, see if things worked out, then also move on down the list if it didn't? Is this to be expected when you have more than one "option"?

* Is there a "proper" Christian way to handle these situations that respects others and their feelings?


And of course, it can go both ways.

I was on Christian Mingle back when it had chat rooms, and one of the reason I'm not on the dating sites is because (from what I've seen,) they don't have live chats anymore.

A guy with an especially noticeable "model-like" picture was always bantering with me in the chat room, and the other girls private messaged me saying, "Beware of this one. He's talking to every girl here, and he won't answer your questions. He sends plenty of pictures, but he doesn't talk about his actual life, and we don't think those pictures are actually him."

So aside from the catfishing (presumably presenting a deceptively attractive picture,) he was also "going on down the list," picking and choosing which girl(s) he liked best, and who would be the "better" option(s.)

But this is bound to happen on dating sites, and to be expected, since these sites are open to so many people.

* Christians, what is the best way to handle these circumstances, whether we are the one with the gaggle of options, or the one being put in the backseat behind a long list of "first picks"?
 
Jun 28, 2025
22
13
3
Southeast USA
#2
Hey Everyone,

"Triage" is defined as: the process of examining problems in order to decide which are the most serious and must be dealt with first.

It's often used in medicine (deciding which patients need help first,) and business (deciding which problems need action first,) but I think it can be applied to dating as well.

A friend and I were talking about something we've observed on dating sites -- first of all, we all know that the men and women who are deemed most attractive/have the most desirable traits (looks, money, job, own a home, etc.) are going to get the most people messaging them.

So what happens when people have several options?

Let's say that Paul finds Sara attractive and sends her a message. Sara thinks Paul is a nice guy, but she also has messages from John, Bill, Frank, and Stan.

And so, Sara does a "triage" evaluation of all her options. She politely answers each of them, but early on, she knows that she is interested in John and Bill more than any of the others. She doesn't think she is compatible with Frank or Stan, so she allows communication with them to die down and eventually stop. Paul seems like a nice guy, but she doesn't feel feel especially attracted to him -- she has some contact with Paul, but it's very casual, infrequent, and also dies off.

About 2 months pass, and Sara has not talked with Paul at all during this time, because she's more interested in John and and Bill. Sara has spent all her time during these months trying to get to know them. However, things do not work out. John finally says he's not interested in her, and Sara realizes that she and Bill aren't really a match.

And so, after around 2 months of no communication, Sara decides to write Paul "out of the blue" to "see how he's doing."

In other words, her first choices didn't work out -- and so now, she's "working on down the list."

* How should Paul feel about this?

* Should he give her a chance, or keep moving? What would you do?

* What do you do when you know you're not a "first choice," but just an "alternative" who's further on down the list?

And on the flip side:

* If YOU were the one with several options, how would you handle it?

* Would you prioritize who you liked best, see if things worked out, then also move on down the list if it didn't? Is this to be expected when you have more than one "option"?

* Is there a "proper" Christian way to handle these situations that respects others and their feelings?


And of course, it can go both ways.

I was on Christian Mingle back when it had chat rooms, and one of the reason I'm not on the dating sites is because (from what I've seen,) they don't have live chats anymore.

A guy with an especially noticeable "model-like" picture was always bantering with me in the chat room, and the other girls private messaged me saying, "Beware of this one. He's talking to every girl here, and he won't answer your questions. He sends plenty of pictures, but he doesn't talk about his actual life, and we don't think those pictures are actually him."

So aside from the catfishing (presumably presenting a deceptively attractive picture,) he was also "going on down the list," picking and choosing which girl(s) he liked best, and who would be the "better" option(s.)

But this is bound to happen on dating sites, and to be expected, since these sites are open to so many people.

* Christians, what is the best way to handle these circumstances, whether we are the one with the gaggle of options, or the one being put in the backseat behind a long list of "first picks"?
On somewhat of a sidenote, if anyone knows of any dating sites that have live chat rooms, please do tell. I wasn't aware that some even had that option. Gracias!
 

Tall_Timbers

Well-known member
Mar 31, 2023
1,694
2,000
113
69
Cheyenne WY
christiancommunityforum.com
#3
In the example given, if I was the leftover guy after the favorites withered away, I'd be interested to know that she thought she saw in her favorites that she didn't see in me that attracted her. If I could get the truth out of her, that might help determine if I'd want to get to know her better, or not. And why was I in the reject pile, what about me led her to put me in that pile.

Clearly, since you don't know the person it's very possible to make mistakes, but if I could understand her motives, dreams, and desires, I might learn if there was any possibility of compatibility between us. Those are things that people often don't share, at least not early on. They're more likely to share what they think you might want to hear.
 

Texasgal

Active member
Feb 15, 2025
620
172
43
#4
I guess it all depends on our own situation. If I was on a dating site and there was all sorts of beautiful people left and right, I would’ve probably started off with the one I liked best and tried to stay in the game until we would hit it off or one of us ghosted the other. Then moved onto the next one and so forth. I don’t think I could have applied the Triage method to this.
 

RodB651

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2021
898
598
93
59
#5
And so, after around 2 months of no communication, Sara decides to write Paul "out of the blue" to "see how he's doing."

In other words, her first choices didn't work out -- and so now, she's "working on down the list."
If Sara has other options, that's great for her.

If I were Paul, I'd want to know what happened? .. and move on!
 

tourist

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2014
43,286
17,631
113
70
Tennessee
#6
On somewhat of a sidenote, if anyone knows of any dating sites that have live chat rooms, please do tell. I wasn't aware that some even had that option. Gracias!
I met my late second wife in an AOL chatroom way back in the day. This particular chat room was called. Christian Single Romance. Met my current (and last) wife on this site shortly after I joined. We started conversing in the Single Forum which is very much a chatroom but usually with more in-depth conversations on various topics.
 

seoulsearch

OutWrite Trouble
May 23, 2009
17,692
6,456
113
#7
Just to clarify, I apologize if I didn't word my first post very clearly.

In the traditional meaning, the word "triage" is usually used in the sense of "Who or what is in the most danger -- what people or issues need to be addressed first to try to save them/the company?"

It has an air of emergency and needing to keep someone or something afloat.

In terms of dating, I was thinking of kind of the opposite -- instead of choosing top "emergencies," in this case, the person is choosing and prioritizing the most appealing candidates over the less or no-appeal ones.

They then devote all their time and energy to the top choices -- but if those don't work out, they start working on the ones who were initially seen as less appealing. It's a process that probably can't really be avoided when there are "options," but this sure doesn't soften the blow to the hearts that don't land "first choice."

I'm sorry for any confusion in my use of this term.

We've been getting some very insightful answers here, and I hope it will continue!
 

seoulsearch

OutWrite Trouble
May 23, 2009
17,692
6,456
113
#8
On somewhat of a sidenote, if anyone knows of any dating sites that have live chat rooms, please do tell. I wasn't aware that some even had that option. Gracias!
I honestly don't know if any dating sites with chat rooms exist now. It's been many years since I looked. And yes, real-time chat can sure be an eye-opener.

Many years ago I was on Christian Cafe, which had a general live chat.

And back then, Christian Mingle had chat rooms divided by decades -- 20's, 30's, 40's, 50's, 60+ -- but you could go to any one you wanted.

Some in their 50's and 60's, both men and women, would firmly plant themselves as fixtures in the 20's and 30's room. I was in my 30's at the time, and there was one woman in her mid-50's saying if she could kick the rest of us 30-something women out, she'd stand a chance with the 30-something guys. (I often wondered if she, and others, were actually sober when they were posting some of the things they did.)

If I got a message from a guy or had an interest in one, I'd often go to the live chats to see if he was there. I became friends with some of the regulars there -- and I believe the things they shared saved me from what would have been a lot of dead ends (for both me, and for the other person.)

I'm guessing that dating sites found chats much too labor intensive and expensive to maintain (too much drama and complaints,) and decided that typical static profiles are the easiest way to keep the money rolling.

I definitely could be wrong though, and it would be interesting to know if any such Christian dating sites with live chats exist.
 

Lynx

Folksy yet erudite
Aug 13, 2014
29,379
10,651
113
#9
That's the main reason why I never went out looking for romance. I don't want to treat people like products and I don't want to be treated like a product.

I choose a laptop based on what it can do for me and what I have to pay to get it. I don't want to choose a lady or have a lady choose me that way. Love is not a car.

If she chooses me because her first choices failed, she is trying to find a man to fill what she needs. She doesn't want me because she loves me. She just wants someone to be in that role in her life.

If I go down a list trying to find a girl, why do I think I need one so badly that I'm sorting through them like job applications?
 

Lynx

Folksy yet erudite
Aug 13, 2014
29,379
10,651
113
#10
This could open the door for all kinds of terminology.

If a guy chooses a girl because she's not very demanding and he's lazy and doesn't want to do a lot for her, did he get her on the clearance rack? :geek: He's not paying a lot, and she has learned not to be too needy. One could say she was marked down and he snatched up a deal.
 

CarriePie

Well-known member
Jan 7, 2024
2,724
1,798
113
#12
That's the main reason why I never went out looking for romance. I don't want to treat people like products and I don't want to be treated like a product.

I choose a laptop based on what it can do for me and what I have to pay to get it. I don't want to choose a lady or have a lady choose me that way. Love is not a car.

If she chooses me because her first choices failed, she is trying to find a man to fill what she needs. She doesn't want me because she loves me. She just wants someone to be in that role in her life.

If I go down a list trying to find a girl, why do I think I need one so badly that I'm sorting through them like job applications?

I think this is why I never joined any dating sites or anything that has to do with looking for a date/relationship. My relationships have happened after getting to know someone at school, work, or online and finding out we liked spending time together, then the relationship would happen. After that is when the fun begins. But, I never got to know a guy because I was looking for a relationship. If it headed that way, it headed that way.
 

enril

Well-known member
Aug 18, 2024
711
356
63
15
#14

seoulsearch

OutWrite Trouble
May 23, 2009
17,692
6,456
113
#15
Oh boy, Seouls at it again. :geek::LOL:o_O
Since 2009... And Going... For As Long As God Allows.
I almost feel sorry for the people who thought/think I might just be a flash in the thread-frying pan. :LOL:
To be honest, my motivations for writing these threads are:

1. To bring people together, help them meet, etc. -- this seems to be a primary component in my calling.

And not just strictly for dating or marriage. I always hope that all kinds of people can meet through these discussions, like parents who are feeling alone but realize they're not the only ones, or those struggling in their situations but see others who are getting through in faith, etc.

I always smile when we get the occasional person here who doesn't like what they see and then proclaims they're putting everyone on ignore -- but yet can't understand why they're not meeting anyone! :cool: Well... It's no guarantee, but people know people -- and if spend the time to get to know people here... We might just know -- or be -- someone you might like to meet. ;)

2. To draw awareness to topics I've always found interesting or troubling, but rarely, if ever, see discussed in church.

3. To give people a sense of community, thread by thread.

Many years ago, someone wrote me and said he was extremely lonely, but that he checked the forum everyday to see if I'd written a new thread. He said it gave him a sense of being able to participate in a group.

I'm sorry that I can't write threads every day (I'm thinking there would be a boycott anyway!) but I hope the ones we do have still give people a sense of being able to join in.

4. And, the most important reason of all -- I need to live up to the title under my username, which says everything!

"Outright Trouble."

I have a reputation to keep, and it's a full-time job! :LOL:
 
Jun 28, 2025
22
13
3
Southeast USA
#16
I honestly don't know if any dating sites with chat rooms exist now. It's been many years since I looked. And yes, real-time chat can sure be an eye-opener.

Many years ago I was on Christian Cafe, which had a general live chat.

And back then, Christian Mingle had chat rooms divided by decades -- 20's, 30's, 40's, 50's, 60+ -- but you could go to any one you wanted.

Some in their 50's and 60's, both men and women, would firmly plant themselves as fixtures in the 20's and 30's room. I was in my 30's at the time, and there was one woman in her mid-50's saying if she could kick the rest of us 30-something women out, she'd stand a chance with the 30-something guys. (I often wondered if she, and others, were actually sober when they were posting some of the things they did.)

If I got a message from a guy or had an interest in one, I'd often go to the live chats to see if he was there. I became friends with some of the regulars there -- and I believe the things they shared saved me from what would have been a lot of dead ends (for both me, and for the other person.)

I'm guessing that dating sites found chats much too labor intensive and expensive to maintain (too much drama and complaints,) and decided that typical static profiles are the easiest way to keep the money rolling.

I definitely could be wrong though, and it would be interesting to know if any such Christian dating sites with live chats exist.
Yes, I met one of my girlfriends in one of the Christian AOL chat rooms. I always found those to be pretty good. I also had many online friends develop from those. I had no idea, though, that any of the Christian singles sites ever had those. Interesting. Yeah, they may have found out they are too expensive/laborious to maintain. Who knows.
 

RodB651

Well-known member
Feb 11, 2021
898
598
93
59
#17
This could open the door for all kinds of terminology.

If a guy chooses a girl because she's not very demanding and he's lazy and doesn't want to do a lot for her, did he get her on the clearance rack? :geek: He's not paying a lot, and she has learned not to be too needy. One could say she was marked down and he snatched up a deal.
🤦🤦🤦
 
Jun 28, 2025
22
13
3
Southeast USA
#18
If the demand for such a lady is high (not sure, so won't assume one way or another), her value may indeed be high. He may have some competition for her. So, if he "lands" such a lady, he may be very fortunate to have wooed her and have to figure out other ways to keep her.
 

Lynx

Folksy yet erudite
Aug 13, 2014
29,379
10,651
113
#19
If the demand for such a lady is high (not sure, so won't assume one way or another), her value may indeed be high. He may have some competition for her. So, if he "lands" such a lady, he may be very fortunate to have wooed her and have to figure out other ways to keep her.
By the way: Howdy and welcome to the forum.