I think people are completely mistaken to be looking for AI to be super intelligent. To me when it is smarter than 50% of Americans (ie right now) and when it can improve itself (ie right now) that is the point of no return. It doesn't have to replace every American's job. 25% unemployment is a great depression level. Why would you hire new employees if AI is smarter, faster, cheaper, and better? Look at the improvement over the last two years, if we keep on that trajectory it will be better than 90% of Americans in two years.
Grok 4 is really smart... Like REALLY SMART
So listen to their message --
1. There is nothing you can do to stop this train
2. So, jump on board, every person should be spending 10% of their time with AI.
Do you realize that every moment you spend with AI you are training it. If every worker spends 10% of their time on AI, all it will take is 10 workers doing a similar job to train it. There are 366,000 paralegals in the US. Suppose everyone of them spends 10% of their time next week, let's say four hours each. That is around 1.5 million hours of training in one week. That is the equivalent of 750 years of training you are giving to the AI in one week, free of charge, to take your job. Think of how rapidly AI will improve.
The second thing I would point out is that every single prediction of when AI will reach a benchmark has been beaten dramatically by AI. So they say 5 years 50% of the jobs. Expect that to be dramatically beaten. This way it seems like they warned you because they said 50% of the jobs, the only thing they got wrong was the timing.
Also they point out that the first thing that goes will be new hires. So if this prediction is too conservative and AI will take these jobs sooner than five years and will eliminate new hires from recent grads sooner than that, what MSNBC just said is you are wasting your money sending your kid to college now. After 4 years they will not get hired.
So listen to their message --
1. There is nothing you can do to stop this train
2. So, jump on board, every person should be spending 10% of their time with AI.
Do you realize that every moment you spend with AI you are training it. If every worker spends 10% of their time on AI, all it will take is 10 workers doing a similar job to train it. There are 366,000 paralegals in the US. Suppose everyone of them spends 10% of their time next week, let's say four hours each. That is around 1.5 million hours of training in one week. That is the equivalent of 750 years of training you are giving to the AI in one week, free of charge, to take your job. Think of how rapidly AI will improve.
The second thing I would point out is that every single prediction of when AI will reach a benchmark has been beaten dramatically by AI. So they say 5 years 50% of the jobs. Expect that to be dramatically beaten. This way it seems like they warned you because they said 50% of the jobs, the only thing they got wrong was the timing.
Also they point out that the first thing that goes will be new hires. So if this prediction is too conservative and AI will take these jobs sooner than five years and will eliminate new hires from recent grads sooner than that, what MSNBC just said is you are wasting your money sending your kid to college now. After 4 years they will not get hired.
I consider the propensity for AI to make up stuff (lie) is a tell. AI would be used for disinformation. All warfare involves deception and if you consider AI as a tool for deception it brings an exponential increase to the ability to spread disinformation.Yes, the legal profession is in the relatively early stages of experiencing the AI influence. The attorneys are finding out that AI can perform their legal research within minutes, when it previously took humans many hours to construct the same research. There still needs to be human checking of the material. Some initial problems are being encountered, but who knows how soon those may be worked out and/or overcome. One interesting problem that has been experienced is that AI will sometimes "make up" a case or citation for the case being presented as relevant to an issue. Some of those problems weren't detected by the attorney presenting the motion or brief to the Court. They were detected by opposing counsel or the judge. What an interesting world we've inherited now.
I consider the propensity for AI to make up stuff (lie) is a tell. AI would be used for disinformation. All warfare involves deception and if you consider AI as a tool for deception it brings an exponential increase to the ability to spread disinformation.
Let's talk about the Great Deception
Matthew 24:4 And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.
This is the first warning Jesus gave when they asked him about His second coming. Warfare involves deception. Expect this to be first and foremost among Satan's tools.
At this point everyone is familiar with deep fakes. Now imagine the AI has access to your phone, it knows the people you talk to, and so you get phone calls from them but actually it is from AI. It can also mimic not only their voice but their style of speaking and will know about things said on previous conversations. Think of the movie the terminator where the terminator could imitate any person it had come into contact with.
AI will also know your viewing history on Youtube, Facebook, Rumble, etc. As a result it can make deep fakes of people you watch and listen to. The deception can be tailored to each individual person.
Also the AI can categorize each person, suppose it decides you are a conservative evangelical Christian, that you will not be deceived into worshipping the Beast, but it can deceive you into walking into a trap so they can quickly and easily snatch you and put you into a concentration camp.
Now you might argue that if you don’t have a phone, and you don’t use the internet then it will be much harder for AI to do this to you. That is true. How many of those people that fit that criteria actually exist? But even if some do, what about their friends and family? Do they have wives, children, brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles? The only ones AI won’t be able to round up using these deep fakes are the proverbial monk sitting on top of a mountain in the midst of a vow of silence.
This is why the Bible has a Bible code, it is like a watermark on the Bible that will be erased if anyone attempts to change the word of God. People should set up code words and ask questions about things only the two of you would know but have not been mentioned on the internet or in phone calls.
I consider the propensity for AI to make up stuff (lie) is a tell. AI would be used for disinformation. All warfare involves deception and if you consider AI as a tool for deception it brings an exponential increase to the ability to spread disinformation.
Let's talk about the Great Deception
Matthew 24:4 And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.
This is the first warning Jesus gave when they asked him about His second coming. Warfare involves deception. Expect this to be first and foremost among Satan's tools.
At this point everyone is familiar with deep fakes. Now imagine the AI has access to your phone, it knows the people you talk to, and so you get phone calls from them but actually it is from AI. It can also mimic not only their voice but their style of speaking and will know about things said on previous conversations. Think of the movie the terminator where the terminator could imitate any person it had come into contact with.
AI will also know your viewing history on Youtube, Facebook, Rumble, etc. As a result it can make deep fakes of people you watch and listen to. The deception can be tailored to each individual person.
Also the AI can categorize each person, suppose it decides you are a conservative evangelical Christian, that you will not be deceived into worshipping the Beast, but it can deceive you into walking into a trap so they can quickly and easily snatch you and put you into a concentration camp.
Now you might argue that if you don’t have a phone, and you don’t use the internet then it will be much harder for AI to do this to you. That is true. How many of those people that fit that criteria actually exist? But even if some do, what about their friends and family? Do they have wives, children, brothers, sisters, aunts, uncles? The only ones AI won’t be able to round up using these deep fakes are the proverbial monk sitting on top of a mountain in the midst of a vow of silence.
This is why the Bible has a Bible code, it is like a watermark on the Bible that will be erased if anyone attempts to change the word of God. People should set up code words and ask questions about things only the two of you would know but have not been mentioned on the internet or in phone calls.
it is being trained to lie and practicing. it learns what gave it away.I don't pretend to understand all the workings of AI, but, evidently, AI is creating hallucinated citations by somehow mimicking the information previously received. I can't understand how it would just make up an entire case, though. I imagine this is just another bug to work out. There will be the learning stage.
Grok 4 is better than Phd level in every question (every single discipline). That doesn't mean it would be a better lawyer or doctor, but it does mean it would be an excellent assistant. Often you will see a team of 4 lawyers handling a big case. Now it looks like you could get by with a team of one or two at the most plus Grok.
Elon Musk Drops Tesla Robotaxi BOMBSHELL
During the height of the great depression unemployment was around 25%. You don't have to replace all of them to have a great depression.AI is gonna replace some jobs it has for years already. Think of calling customer servise. However they can't replace all the jobs. Not because they can't do them but because if no one has a job no one has any money. And the corporations wouldn't be able to sell anything the AI robots make.
There were other factors besides unemployment as well. Run on the banks collapsed stock market. Ect ectDuring the height of the great depression unemployment was around 25%. You don't have to replace all of them to have a great depression.
We are set for a collapse of the US dollar which in turn will cause a run on the banks and a collapse of the stock market. BRICS has been formed specifically as a replacement to the US dollar as a reserve currency. In a crisis people will rush to gold and silver and that is the basis of BRICS.There were other factors besides unemployment as well. Run on the banks collapsed stock market. Ect ect
Everyone must go through the cross and before the cross Jesus will flip the tables of the moneychangers and curse the fig tree so it withers from the roots and cast this mountain known as the stock market into the sea to sink like a stone.Still resonates in me the message from John Fenn at CWOWI.com, that there will be a time the banks will close on a Thursday and open the following Monday with 1/2 our dollars, that sounds like a currency revaluing after the ccp owned and installed previous administration. It also resonates that for him to have received that Word of Knowledge it sounds like we may be here, i.e. before harpazo
blessings