Biblical Polygamy?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Jun 17, 2025
100
11
18
#41
Gen 2:23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
Gen 2:24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

Mat 19:5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?
Mat 19:6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.

A man can only be one flesh with one woman not multiple wives.

This was from the beginning before Abraham was chosen.

Israel is God's chosen people but He is not going to go against His law that a man should have one wife.

But He is a forgiving and merciful God and Israel is His chosen people so He allowed it.

Jacob had 12 children by 4 women, 2 were his wife, and 2 were his wive's servants.

But God is a forgiving God and had a purpose for Israel so He blessed the children and Jacob was forgiven.

Also it was not the children's sin to be cursed which God said the son shall not bear the sins of the father, and the father shall not bear the sins of the son, but every person shall bear their own sin.

King David had Uriah put in battle so he would die so he could have his wife Bathsheba which he sinned in coveting another man's wife.

He was punished because of it and had a child by Bathsheba, Solomon, who became king and God blessed him with wisdom and riches more then any other king.

We are to have only one wife and now that God is dealing with the world it is probably more of a stricter issue and might not be forgiven like in the Old Testament when He was dealing with Israel.

That is probably why Bishops, Deacons, and Elders, clergy, are commanded to have only one wife.

And that would go for all the saints for all of the saints are to hold the same morality.

Mat 19:5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?
Mat 19:6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.

Jesus came to bring a teaching, and salvation on the spiritual level and He taught what was from the beginning.

I do not believe having more than one wife is permitted but God had a purpose for Israel, was forgiving, and blessed the children.

He allowed it but probably was not permitted but was not a serious offense which we do not see it in the 10 commandments, or in the physical laws, and no person was stoned for it.
Thank you for your post, you have touched on a lot more than you may realize. I have honestly been approaching this subject with discernment and gentleness, ironically.

I was not planning on going for the throat out of the gate, but seems to not be following my train of thought. So I will most next my direct thoughts on the matter.
 
Jun 17, 2025
100
11
18
#42
Gen 2:23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
Gen 2:24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.

Mat 19:5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?
Mat 19:6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.

A man can only be one flesh with one woman not multiple wives.

This was from the beginning before Abraham was chosen.

Israel is God's chosen people but He is not going to go against His law that a man should have one wife.

But He is a forgiving and merciful God and Israel is His chosen people so He allowed it.

Jacob had 12 children by 4 women, 2 were his wife, and 2 were his wive's servants.

But God is a forgiving God and had a purpose for Israel so He blessed the children and Jacob was forgiven.

Also it was not the children's sin to be cursed which God said the son shall not bear the sins of the father, and the father shall not bear the sins of the son, but every person shall bear their own sin.

King David had Uriah put in battle so he would die so he could have his wife Bathsheba which he sinned in coveting another man's wife.

He was punished because of it and had a child by Bathsheba, Solomon, who became king and God blessed him with wisdom and riches more then any other king.

We are to have only one wife and now that God is dealing with the world it is probably more of a stricter issue and might not be forgiven like in the Old Testament when He was dealing with Israel.

That is probably why Bishops, Deacons, and Elders, clergy, are commanded to have only one wife.

And that would go for all the saints for all of the saints are to hold the same morality.

Mat 19:5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?
Mat 19:6 Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.

Jesus came to bring a teaching, and salvation on the spiritual level and He taught what was from the beginning.

I do not believe having more than one wife is permitted but God had a purpose for Israel, was forgiving, and blessed the children.

He allowed it but probably was not permitted but was not a serious offense which we do not see it in the 10 commandments, or in the physical laws, and no person was stoned for it.
Thank you for your post, you have touched on a lot more than you may realize. I have honestly been approaching this subject with discernment and gentleness, ironically.

I was not planning on going for the throat out of the gate, but seems to not be following my train of thought. So I will most next my direct thoughts on the matter.
I appreciate where you are coming from, but we are not discussing Mormonism here, but rather can “Christians” practice bigamy or polygyny?
 
Jul 7, 2022
11,959
5,239
113
Almost Heaven West Virginia
#43
Thank you for your post, you have touched on a lot more than you may realize. I have honestly been approaching this subject with discernment and gentleness, ironically.

I was not planning on going for the throat out of the gate, but seems to not be following my train of thought. So I will most next my direct thoughts on the matter.


I appreciate where you are coming from, but we are not discussing Mormonism here, but rather can “Christians” practice bigamy or polygyny?
I didn't know that was a thing.
There's the fundamentalist Mormons up north that still do.
I think it was Joseph Smith who said it was required for their Celestial salvation but would have to look it up.

We do see over half of Christianity practices marriage like they do cars.
They trade the older model in when there's a problem for another used car that has fresher paint.
 
Jul 5, 2023
2,436
940
113
65
Colorado, USA
#45
1 word says it all, "obedience". just yesterday, i was talking to a 90 year old woman & she said to me, "i always was a Christian, i don't believe in being born again". i mentioned to her verse John 3:5. she still said she didn't believe it. i have heard this statement hundreds of times. so i said to her, "when you were 1 day old did you say, "Jesus, i accept you as my Lord & savior"? she didn't like hearing that & said she didn't want to talk about it anymore but remained in the issue. so this woman is having her way with the Christianity & it's not what God taught. she is in disobedience.
I've never known a time when I wasn't a Christian. I also believe I was born again.
 
Nov 25, 2024
571
273
63
#47
Yes thank you for raising this point about 1 Corinthians, and I have two questions:

1. Are all commands in 1 Corinthians equal and applicable today?
I believe so in context, but feel free to quote one you think is not.

2. Verse 20, so if a many us a polygynist, should he seek to not be?
Is that what the verse says?


@everyone

I am Achilles at the siege of Troy, you all wanted to talk about the ins and outs of marriage in the Bible not me.


I will pose another question to you, two men one in a homosexual marriage one in bigamy, both want to continue their relationships as is also their partners agree and they cite 1 Corinthians 7:20.
A homosexual "marriage" is not a marriage. The question is invalid. A homosexual relationship is an abomination, and can never be a marriage.


I would say that the homosexual “marriage” cannot ever be reconciled with scripture or the Christian lifestyle, so that is a non-starter.
Correct.


But if we say that the bigamist cannot because it is equally contradictory to scripture as the homosexual relationship, how do we reconcile that God permitted a sin equal to homosexual practices within his people if only for a time?
No. Homosexuality is flagged as an abomination.


Are all sins equal, then why are some sins given a death sentences where others are given means of restitution?
All sins are not equal.

As for bigamy, what did David do when Phaltiel the son of Laish was involved in bigamy with his wife Michal, whom David had purchased for an hundred foreskins of the Philistines? He took her back.

2 Samuel 3:14 - 16
14 And David sent messengers to Ishbosheth Saul's son, saying, Deliver me my wife Michal, which I espoused to me for an hundred foreskins of the Philistines.
15 And Ishbosheth sent, and took her from her husband, even from Phaltiel the son of Laish.
16 And her husband went with her along weeping behind her to Bahurim. Then said Abner unto him, Go, return. And he returned.
 
Jun 12, 2025
82
29
18
USA
#48
Polygamy, polygyny, polyandry, polyamory, I often use polygamy meaning polygyny, but it is an umbrella term that could mean all of them so I will try to say polygyny to be precise.

I think we can agree that only polygyny was practiced in biblical times among God's people.
The common belief is that God tolerated this but did not endorse or recommend it.
I know of one biblical example where God sanctioned Polygyny, but I would not like to reveal that yet.

In the case for Adam, God referred to his singleness as "not good" and made a helper "suitable for him."
Paul says that it is best to be single, that all men should be as he is. which makes tension between the two examples.
But I personally believe that some are called to be married, and some are called to be single.

The common belief, which I disagree with, is that Paul requires church officers (bishops/elders/deacons) to have only "one wife"

So, the question is what do we do with converts who are polygynists?
If you God into the third world or direct a ministry to a cult like the FLDS,
And a man who has three wives comes to christ, what is he to do with his three wives?
Common arguments I hear are:
1. Stay married, but cannot pursue officership.
2. must divorce all but one.
a. divorce we obligation to provide
b. divorce with obligation not to provide
3. Something else entirely that I have not though of?
You said, “I know of one biblical example where God sanctioned polygyny, but I would not like to reveal that yet.”
With respect—if you’re going to make that claim, show your hand. Don’t dangle a mystery. God doesn’t hide His moral standard behind riddles. If you can’t point to a clear, righteous endorsement of polygyny in Scripture, then what you’re calling “sanction” may simply be God’s mercy in the middle of man’s mess, not His approval of it.

Let’s start at the beginning, because that’s what Jesus did.

> “Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’?” —Matthew 19:4–5



That is not vague. That is one man + one woman = one flesh. Not three. Not four. Not interchangeable. Jesus affirmed monogamy as God’s original and enduring design.

And when Paul talks about elders being “the husband of one wife” (1 Timothy 3:2, Titus 1:6), he isn’t being culturally restrictive—he’s setting a moral example. The phrase in Greek literally means “a one-woman man.” It’s not about social optics—it’s about reflecting the covenant nature of Christ and His Bride.

> “This mystery is great, but I am speaking with reference to Christ and the church.” —Ephesians 5:32



Christ has one Bride. Not many.
That’s the model. That’s the mystery. That’s the gospel.

Regarding converts with multiple wives:

Yes, this is a real issue in missions. But we must not create new doctrine to accommodate broken situations. We handle them with mercy, wisdom, and truth—not compromise.

1. Keep all wives, but bar from leadership.
This is the most consistent position—not because polygyny is ideal, but because covenant matters. You don’t fix past sin by compounding it with new sin—like divorcing women who have been joined to you, especially when they have children. Let them remain married, provide for them, but do not allow that situation to be modeled as a “norm.”


2. Forcing divorce is dangerous and unbiblical.
God hates divorce (Malachi 2:16). Even in a polygynous state, covenant carries weight. You don’t fix error with abandonment. That’s not biblical restoration—that’s spiritual pride wearing moral glasses.


3. Church leaders must reflect the ideal, not exceptions.
Leadership requires the pattern of Christ. A man with three wives may be genuinely saved, but his household doesn’t reflect the covenant of Christ and the Church. He can be discipled, used, and loved—but not held up as a shepherd or overseer.




---

Bottom line:
Polygyny was recorded in the Bible. It was never prescribed.
It caused pain, rivalry, division, and spiritual fallout—every single time.

Abraham? Hagar became a source of strife and bitterness.

Jacob? Leah and Rachel’s war wounded a generation.

David? His many wives led to a fractured house.

Solomon? His wives led him into idolatry and destroyed his heart.


Not one example ends well. Not one is called righteous because of it.
God may work through polygamous men—but never because of their polygamy.


---

This generation needs clarity, not ambiguity. Holiness, not hypotheticals.

The gospel doesn’t adjust to culture. It calls every culture to the unchanging standard of Jesus Christ.
And when the standard is hard, we don’t lower it—we raise our cross and follow Him anyway.

> “Be holy, for I am holy.” —1 Peter 1:16
“Present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and acceptable to God…” —Romans 12:1
“He will purify the sons of Levi…” —Malachi 3:3



This is not about legality—it’s about purity. And the Bride must be pure.

So no—we don’t normalize polygyny.
We preach Christ. We counsel with grace.
And we never redefine the standard to fit man’s failure.

—Shane
 

Karlon

Well-known member
Mar 8, 2023
3,305
1,521
113
#49
I've never known a time when I wasn't a Christian. I also believe I was born again.
you were not a Christian when a baby & a bit after that. none of us are. impossible. if we are born in a Christian family that doesn't mean we are Christians. you have to become one while understanding that you are now accountable, reliable, responsible for yourself. (not an argument but a discussion).
 
Jul 5, 2023
2,436
940
113
65
Colorado, USA
#50
you were not a Christian when a baby & a bit after that. none of us are. impossible. if we are born in a Christian family that doesn't mean we are Christians. you have to become one while understanding that you are now accountable, reliable, responsible for yourself. (not an argument but a discussion).
You have no idea WHEN I was born again. Understanding that I was accountable, reliable, and responsible for myself was a process, not a moment.
 
Jul 5, 2023
2,436
940
113
65
Colorado, USA
#51
I didn't know that was a thing.
There's the fundamentalist Mormons up north that still do.
I think it was Joseph Smith who said it was required for their Celestial salvation but would have to look it up.

We do see over half of Christianity practices marriage like they do cars.
They trade the older model in when there's a problem for another used car that has fresher paint.
Modern Mormanism is much more Brigham Young than Joseph Smith.
 
Jun 17, 2025
100
11
18
#55
ok, thanks, and best wishes!

... so, how many you think you want?

:coffee::unsure:
For sake of argument, Let's say I want a dozen,
Does whether, I want 0 or 1 or 2 or 12, mean that my arguments are invalid,
I am assuming you accept Paul's opinions on marriage though he has no wife,
Are my opinions on marriage automatically invalid because I have 12?

Ad hominem argument?
 

lrs68

Well-known member
Dec 30, 2024
1,543
432
83
#57
For sake of argument, Let's say I want a dozen,
Does whether, I want 0 or 1 or 2 or 12, mean that my arguments are invalid,
I am assuming you accept Paul's opinions on marriage though he has no wife,
Are my opinions on marriage automatically invalid because I have 12?

Ad hominem argument?
This is for entertainment purposes only:

One Wife = Sanity

Each Wife after the First = ° [degrees] of Insanity
 
Jul 31, 2013
38,822
13,881
113
#58
For sake of argument, Let's say I want a dozen,
Does whether, I want 0 or 1 or 2 or 12, mean that my arguments are invalid,
I am assuming you accept Paul's opinions on marriage though he has no wife,
Are my opinions on marriage automatically invalid because I have 12?

Ad hominem argument?
only poking fun.

so, i suppose in balance i should give you a serious reply:

  • imo no one should ever "seek" authority, not secular power nor church leadership. it's a calling not an ambition.
  • 1 Cor. 7 is clear advice; if a married person comes to belief, they should not seek divorce but if their spouse/spouses seek it, let them leave.
 
Jun 17, 2025
100
11
18
#59
So, I have been having problems accessing and posting to the site, has anyone else had similar issues?

Here is the best presentation of my argument, in a nutshell, that I can make.
God created Adam, it was "not good" for him to be only, so God made Eve, and it was "very good."
He commanded them, "to be fruitful and multiply" which I believe is the commissioning of a mandate for sex in marriage.
Paul presents an argument saying that he wishes all [mankind] to be [single} as he is," and that this is "better"
I do think there is a conflict here, but I will give Paul some poetic license (which is another reason why I am hasn't to argue a hard and fast argument from Paul on this topic.)
Jesus says, speaking against serial monogamy and divorce that it is a sin to divorce one's wife.
(But only stipulates "adultery" as the "only" justifiable reason,
Which opens the can of worms with is "abuse" "abandonment" "coma" etc. also exceptions?)
And so, I do sincerely appreciate extrapolating the argument that,
If serial marriage is a sin, then so is plural marriage.
The question I then raise is are converts who are polygynist grandfathered in?
And if so, why is this not an avenue for all believing men and consenting women?
Should we treat polygyny as we do homosexual marriage?
I would say no, you are free to disagree, but I feel that plural marriage whether for the convert or the believer or even the non-believer is a bell that cannot be un-rung (I almost spelled in wrung, lol.)
So now we go for the throat,
I have sincerely not wanted to bring this up because I know it will be missed used.
But there is a biblical example of God endorsing polygyny.
Adam was called to have one wife, Paul was called to have none,
And David was called to have many.
And what verse makes me say this?
"And I gave you your master’s house and your master’s wives into your arms and gave you the house of Israel and of Judah. And if this were too little, I would add to you as much more." (2 Samuel 12:8)
And I am sure your kneejerk reaction will be, "but he punished David for having more than one wife?"
But no, you are wrong, he punished David and his unborn child for Adultery with Bathsheba and the murder of Uriah.
(And just for another cheap shot Ezekiel 18:20)

Now you have become like me,
knowing good and evil,
You wanted this,
Do you have buyer's remorse yet?
 
Jun 17, 2025
100
11
18
#60
So, I have been having problems accessing and posting to the site, has anyone else had similar issues?

Here is the best presentation of my argument, in a nutshell, that I can make.
God created Adam, it was "not good" for him to be only, so God made Eve, and it was "very good."
He commanded them, "to be fruitful and multiply" which I believe is the commissioning of a mandate for sex in marriage.
Paul presents an argument saying that he wishes all [mankind] to be [single} as he is," and that this is "better"
I do think there is a conflict here, but I will give Paul some poetic license (which is another reason why I am hasn't to argue a hard and fast argument from Paul on this topic.)
Jesus says, speaking against serial monogamy and divorce that it is a sin to divorce one's wife.
(But only stipulates "adultery" as the "only" justifiable reason,
Which opens the can of worms with is "abuse" "abandonment" "coma" etc. also exceptions?)
And so, I do sincerely appreciate extrapolating the argument that,
If serial marriage is a sin, then so is plural marriage.
The question I then raise is are converts who are polygynist grandfathered in?
And if so, why is this not an avenue for all believing men and consenting women?
Should we treat polygyny as we do homosexual marriage?
I would say no, you are free to disagree, but I feel that plural marriage whether for the convert or the believer or even the non-believer is a bell that cannot be un-rung (I almost spelled in wrung, lol.)
So now we go for the throat,
I have sincerely not wanted to bring this up because I know it will be missed used.
But there is a biblical example of God endorsing polygyny.
Adam was called to have one wife, Paul was called to have none,
And David was called to have many.
And what verse makes me say this?
"And I gave you your master’s house and your master’s wives into your arms and gave you the house of Israel and of Judah. And if this were too little, I would add to you as much more." (2 Samuel 12:8)
And I am sure your kneejerk reaction will be, "but he punished David for having more than one wife?"
But no, you are wrong, he punished David and his unborn child for Adultery with Bathsheba and the murder of Uriah.
(And just for another cheap shot Ezekiel 18:20)

Now you have become like me,
knowing good and evil,
You wanted this,
Do you have buyer's remorse yet?