No, what you have supplied is commentary; an expression of opinions or offering of explanations about an event or situation.
The actual biblical account reveals:
1. Jesus gave the command to baptize in a singular name. Matthew 28:19
2. The apostles understood what name Jesus was referring to as revealed and confirmed numerous times in scripture. (Acts 2:4-41, 8:12-18, 10:43-48, 19:1-7)
3. Church history reveals when men decided they knew better than God and His apostles, and stripped the name of Jesus from the practice. The word of God expresses that the traditions of men have the ability to make the word of God of none effect. (Mark 7:13)
4. Jesus Christ is the one who died, was buried and resurrected. And those who are baptized are buried with whom? Him. (Rom. 6:3-6, Col. 2:10-15)
People should seriously consider what Peter told those who objected to the apostles using the name of Jesus:
"Then Peter said, Silver and gold have I none; but such as I have give I thee: In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth rise up and walk." Acts 3:6
"Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole.
11 This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner.
12 Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.
13 Now when they saw the boldness of Peter and John, and perceived that they were unlearned and ignorant men, they marvelled; and they took knowledge of them, that they had been with Jesus.
14 And beholding the man which was healed standing with them, they could say nothing against it.
15 But when they had commanded them to go aside out of the council, they conferred among themselves,
16 Saying, What shall we do to these men? for that indeed a notable miracle hath been done by them is manifest to all them that dwell in Jerusalem; and we cannot deny it.
17 But that it spread no further among the people, let us straitly threaten them, that they speak henceforth to no man in this name.
18 And they called them, and commanded them not to speak at all NOR teach in the name of Jesus.
19 But Peter and John answered and said unto them, Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye. Acts 4:10-18
The actual biblical account reveals:
1. Jesus gave the command to baptize in a singular name. Matthew 28:19
2. The apostles understood what name Jesus was referring to as revealed and confirmed numerous times in scripture. (Acts 2:4-41, 8:12-18, 10:43-48, 19:1-7)
3. Church history reveals when men decided they knew better than God and His apostles, and stripped the name of Jesus from the practice. The word of God expresses that the traditions of men have the ability to make the word of God of none effect. (Mark 7:13)
4. Jesus Christ is the one who died, was buried and resurrected. And those who are baptized are buried with whom? Him. (Rom. 6:3-6, Col. 2:10-15)
People should seriously consider what Peter told those who objected to the apostles using the name of Jesus:
"Then Peter said, Silver and gold have I none; but such as I have give I thee: In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth rise up and walk." Acts 3:6
"Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole.
11 This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner.
12 Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.
13 Now when they saw the boldness of Peter and John, and perceived that they were unlearned and ignorant men, they marvelled; and they took knowledge of them, that they had been with Jesus.
14 And beholding the man which was healed standing with them, they could say nothing against it.
15 But when they had commanded them to go aside out of the council, they conferred among themselves,
16 Saying, What shall we do to these men? for that indeed a notable miracle hath been done by them is manifest to all them that dwell in Jerusalem; and we cannot deny it.
17 But that it spread no further among the people, let us straitly threaten them, that they speak henceforth to no man in this name.
18 And they called them, and commanded them not to speak at all NOR teach in the name of Jesus.
19 But Peter and John answered and said unto them, Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye. Acts 4:10-18
You try to use Grammatical jujitsu ". Jesus gave the command to baptize in a singular name. Matthew 28:19"
You focus on the name while missing the authority.
"2. The apostles understood what name Jesus was referring to as revealed and confirmed numerous times in scripture. "(Acts 2:4-41, 8:12-18, 10:43-48, 19:1-7)
Your two points here are given at the expense of all Scripture. You took a term, made a context, and left out what was said before and after Mathew 28:17-20
17 When they saw him, they worshiped him; but some doubted. 18 Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. 19 Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”
Who gave Jesus the Authority? “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. "
Why would Jesus need one to give him Authority? If Jesus was speaking in singular, he surely was not when HE said the authority was given to him. That is because in the name of means commissioned by an authority, "IN the name of in the Greek " means the name, i.e. for one's rank, authority, interests, pleasure, command, excellences, deeds, etc.
-
2
- Show all