What do you think of Sarah calling Abraham Lord?
As another side note, Sarah called Abraham "lord", not "Lord". There is a huge difference
What do you think of Sarah calling Abraham Lord?
In the Greek NT, KURIOS has several nuances. Some uses in the NT are Lord, lord, father, master, Master, owner, Sir.
In the Greek NT, KURIOS has several nuances. Some uses in the NT are Lord, lord, father, master, Master, owner, Sir.
Have u noticed that no women have replied to this post ?
In our culture, women are very masculine if you ask me. What do you think of Sarah calling Abraham Lord?
It's good for men to become enlightened about how much we do need and actually depend upon our wives that God created to help us. Unfortunately, most men have to lose their wife before learning this valuable lesson.You know this brings to mind. My cousin while his wife was away had decided he was going to do the house work for a couple of days. He cleaned it the first day and couldn't believe it was messy the very next day! My mom say yep that's what happens. oh goodness I still remember the look on his face. Well he was VERY happy his wife came back. He just couldn't fathom doing what we do every day. Woman of course like progress in work but we are also okay with the same and that's where we differ from men.
.
This comment is probably off-topic but it might fit.
The man was created first and later some material was taken from his body
to construct the woman. In matters related to primogeniture, that makes the
man the senior of the two and she the junior. So then it is impossible for
women to ever be equals with men in the natural sphere of things.
Now had the woman been created directly from the earth's soil like the man
was, then she would've bern a living soul in her own right and on equal footing
with the man. But as it is, the woman was the man's paternal offspring, and
we all know from the Ten Commandments that offspring are not equal to
their parents, viz: the woman wasn't Adam's peer; therefore she was given a
supporting role rather than a co-starring role.
_
Nowhere in Scripture is Adam’s creation prior to Eve’s established as reason for them to be unequal. Your comments are rooted in an English mistranslation of “ezer kenegdo” from Genesis 2. I strongly encourage you to do your homework before embarrassing yourself further..
This comment is probably off-topic but it might fit.
The man was created first and later some material was taken from his body
to construct the woman. In matters related to primogeniture, that makes the
man the senior of the two and she the junior. So then it is impossible for
women to ever be equals with men in the natural sphere of things.
Now had the woman been created directly from the earth's soil like the man
was, then she would've bern a living soul in her own right and on equal footing
with the man. But as it is, the woman was the man's paternal offspring, and
we all know from the Ten Commandments that offspring are not equal to
their parents, viz: the woman wasn't Adam's peer; therefore she was given a
supporting role rather than a co-starring role.
_
How exactly was she not a living soul in her own right?had the woman been created directly from the earth's soil like the
man was, then she would've been a living soul in her own right
This is true and already been posted in this thread... but whether he sees it or notNowhere in Scripture is Adam’s creation prior to Eve’s established as reason for them to be unequal. Your comments are rooted in an English mistranslation of “ezer kenegdo” from Genesis 2. I strongly encourage you to do your homework before embarrassing yourself further.
Genesis 2:24.
This comment is probably off-topic but it might fit.
The man was created first and later some material was taken from his body
to construct the woman. In matters related to primogeniture, that makes the
man the senior of the two and she the junior. So then it is impossible for
women to ever be equals with men in the natural sphere of things.
Now had the woman been created directly from the earth's soil like the man
was, then she would've bern a living soul in her own right and on equal footing
with the man. But as it is, the woman was the man's paternal offspring, and
we all know from the Ten Commandments that offspring are not equal to
their parents, viz: the woman wasn't Adam's peer; therefore she was given a
supporting role rather than a co-starring role.
_
That would be his exampling the sins of pride and hubris.This is true and already been posted in this thread... but whether he sees it or not
is uncertain, since any attempt to correct that guy gets you put on his ignore list.
That would be his exampling the sins of pride and hubris.
You cannot hope to educate those who are unable to receive education where they are weak in scripture.
Besides that being pitiable, the blessing is God does not operate by Webber's many false teachings. Webber must do.
In which case,I recommend prayers for his wife.
The devil is in the details apparently.As another side note, Sarah called Abraham "lord", not "Lord". There is a huge difference.
It seems to me that Eve was definitely the peer of Adam as she was made out of his (human) kind..
This comment is probably off-topic but it might fit.
The man was created first and later some material was taken from his body
to construct the woman. In matters related to primogeniture, that makes the
man the senior of the two and she the junior. So then it is impossible for
women to ever be equals with men in the natural sphere of things.
Now had the woman been created directly from the earth's soil like the man
was, then she would've bern a living soul in her own right and on equal footing
with the man. But as it is, the woman was the man's paternal offspring, and
we all know from the Ten Commandments that offspring are not equal to
their parents, viz: the woman wasn't Adam's peer; therefore she was given a
supporting role rather than a co-starring role.
_
Eve was made of the rib of Adam. That strong bone that houses the heart created from God,and the Lungs that carry His breath.It seems to me that Eve was definitely the peer of Adam as she was made out of his (human) kind.
Can't see at all how Eve could be considered the offspring of Adam. I'm no expert on biology but believe that it takes the sperm of a man and the egg of a woman to create a human baby. Maybe Adam called Eve "Baby". That would be sort of a romantic intimate thing to say to her for sure.
Your Ten Commandment reference to this point of contention is bizarre. Adam most definitely was not the parent of Eve. If so, then Adam married his daughter. I'm no bible scholar but I believe that such an act would constitute as being an abomination in the eyes of the Lord.
I write Jew and auto correct wrote,New. At least it didn't autoC to, Geek.Eve was made of the rib of Adam. That strong bone that houses the heart created from God,and the Lungs that carry His breath.
Eve wasn't made from his skull bone so as to be above him. Eve wasn't made from his foot bone so to be tread under by his will.
She was made from the structure that protects his life. As God willed.
And as God said,they were one. Then.
Just as there is no male or female sex divisive nature in his children today. No Jew. No Greek.
We are all one in Him.
It would indeed.It seems to me that Eve was definitely the peer of Adam as she was made out of his (human) kind.
Can't see at all how Eve could be considered the offspring of Adam. I'm no expert on biology but believe that it takes the sperm of a man and the egg of a woman to create a human baby. Maybe Adam called Eve "Baby". That would be sort of a romantic intimate thing to say to her for sure.
Your Ten Commandment reference to this point of contention is bizarre. Adam most definitely was not the parent of Eve. If so, then Adam married his daughter. I'm no bible scholar but I believe that such an act would constitute as being an abomination in the eyes of the Lord.