The double-standards of the preterist and why I left that system

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
8,248
3,228
113
#83
amen

The LORD is in his holy temple, The LORD's throne is in heaven: His eyes behold, his eyelids try, the children of men.”
‭‭Psalm‬ ‭11:4‬ ‭KJV‬‬

but one thing is after the new Jerusalem comes down from heaven to earth …..the new creation has the living temple and not a building where Gods spirit dwells tbat needs to be rebuilt bit rather within our hearts through the lamb Jesus Christ

“And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it.”
‭‭Revelation‬ ‭21:22‬ ‭

Jesus already rebuilt the true temple his body
Some people believe an actual physical temple will descend from heaven and will be suspended in space and Jesus will rule from there.
I do not agree with this interpretation because Jesus stated..... but my kingdom is not of this world.
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
8,248
3,228
113
#84
Where did you get that idea? Who told you that? Has someone pressured you into believing it?

Eschatological views are not on the 'heresy' level sufficient to be banned or reprimanded. Deity-of-Jesus is a necessary believe/view for this site; eschatological views are not - as long as they do not somehow cross any actual 'heresy' lines as determined by the site owner/staff. Then, it would no doubt be considered 'heresy' for a non-purely-eschatological reason.

There is a difference between believing that a particular eschatological view is 'heresy' and believing that it is [simply] wrong.

I consider neither Preterism nor Futurism to be heretical - just plain wrong - not biblical truth. I believe both have caused many Christians to be led astray from scriptural truth. But, in the greater picture of the necessity of Christian fellowship - especially in the context of an internet platform like this site - you have to allow for it. And, it should go without saying that eschatology should be discussed in accordance with 1 Corinthians 14:40.

I realize that - if you take the word 'heresy' to its finite definition - anything-and-everything that does not align perfectly with scripture may be considered 'heresy'. However, because we are all human - and, can all be wrong about things - there has to be a limit (or, cut-off point) where we allow for others to have opinions different than our own. So then - it might be said that there are different "levels" of 'heresy' to be considered - with only the "highest" level(s) not being allowed to be "violated" without corrective recourse.

I am quite sure that the site owner/staff does not consider eschatological views to be "high enough" on the 'heresy' scale to necessitate ban or reprimand just for expressing or explaining it to others. I am pretty sure that - as long as the discussion is made in an appropriate manner - all is well and good as far as they are concerned (with regard to the operation of the site).

(If I am wrong about any of this, the site owner/staff is more than welcome to correct me on it.)


I am truly interested in better understanding your view - because, it does not make sense to me - and, I want to know how it is that it does make sense to you. The Historicist view is the only thing that makes sense to me as being supported by scripture. The Preterist and Future views create too many unanswered questions and misalignments to/with scripture. And, I have-been-there-and-done-that with the Future view. I left it long ago (circa 1980 IIRC) - moving to the Historicist view.

What words of Jesus? Can you give me a list of verses?

I understand if you just do not want to discuss your view with others; however, something is seriously wrong if you have somehow been pressured into believing that you are not allowed to express your eschatological view.

Would you consider a PM with me to discuss it?

I am serious about understanding your view better. And - I think you know me well enough by now - I am not trying to get you into any trouble with the site. Nor do you have to be concerned about me being anything-less-than-a-gentleman in my words or actions toward you.

From what I remember going back to 2016 and a former member who was a full preterist was banned for denying a certain future expected return.

I will say, his reasoning and biblical argumentation was sound and that is when I began to reconsider, it helped that I was not completely brainwashed by the Tim LaHaye types.

One of the best things that every happened to me in terms of my spiritual growth and better understanding of all scripture.

I am fine with private PMs if you have that option (I do not).
 
Jul 4, 2021
2,541
1,174
113
#85
I suggest that this statement is made invalid by Mark 15:38.
The curtain tearing was surely a prophetic sign; but it didn't make the temple not-the-temple; the disciples still continued to call it "the temple", and the authors of the scripture contine to refer to it as "the temple".
 
Jul 4, 2021
2,541
1,174
113
#86
Some people believe an actual physical temple will descend from heaven and will be suspended in space and Jesus will rule from there.
That's probably an outlier even among futurists; because it doesn't make any sense- the New Jerusalem is said to descend from heaven; but Rev. says there's no temple in the New Jerusalem because the lamb is the temple.
 
Sep 2, 2020
15,286
6,220
113
#87
Amen indeed!

Everyone needs to reconsider/reevaluate what the Abomination of Desolation really actually was - when in history it really-actually-and-only happened (once) - and, keep this in mind when interpreting scripture...
I think if we just read longer sections for instance the op mentions this

“But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day: for then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be…..

but when Jesus is done telling them what’s about to happen in Jerusalem to them preparing them he eventually comes to this place

Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.”
‭‭Matthew‬ ‭24:20-21, 34‬ ‭KJV‬‬

that part tells us it was going to happen in that generation which 70 ad was about appx 30 yrs after Jesus told them and prepared them for the destruction of Jerusalem and it’s desolation.

“And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh. Then let them which are in Judæa flee to the mountains; and let them which are in the midst of it depart out; and let not them that are in the countries enter thereinto. For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled. ( it’s about the things in the ot being fulfilled the wrath upon jerusalem ) But woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck, in those days! for there shall be great distress in the land, and wrath upon this people. And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.”
‭‭Luke‬ ‭21:20-24‬ ‭KJV‬‬

Nothing ever says it’s going to be rebuilt in the nt but after the time of the gentiles being allowed into the kingdom then Christ will return

The temples purpose was a holy place for Gods spirit to dwell in the center of and he could dwell
Among the people this way be among his chosen israelite people ….but that’s the Old Testament now he has a temple already

“Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.”
‭‭1 Corinthians‬ ‭3:16-17‬ ‭KJV‬‬

“in whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord: in whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.”
‭‭Ephesians‬ ‭2:21-22‬ ‭KJV‬‬

God doesn’t need a building now he has a church to dwell within and among that’s new there’s no purpose any longer for a temple …..it has no function anymore there’s no building on earth God will dwell within because he dwells in believers and they in him . There’s a place restored Jerusalem but no temple in it

“And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. ….And there came unto me one of the seven angels which had the seven vials full of the seven last plagues, and talked with me, saying, Come hither, I will shew thee the bride, the Lamb's wife. ( he describes the city )

….And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it.”
‭‭Revelation‬ ‭21:2, 9, 22‬ ‭KJV‬‬

There’s no more need for an imperfect levite priest to sacrifice animals blood upon an altar , and the veil was already torn to hide the inner most holy place .

No more need for the daily sacrifices ect if you break it down everything the temple was built for is already fulfilled in Christianity .



Jerusalem will eventually be revealed but for now it’s a heavenly place and will come from heaven to earth


 
Sep 2, 2020
15,286
6,220
113
#88
Some people believe an actual physical temple will descend from heaven and will be suspended in space and Jesus will rule from there.
I do not agree with this interpretation because Jesus stated..... but my kingdom is not of this world.
after the city is revealed it’s described

“And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it.”
‭‭Revelation‬ ‭21:22‬ ‭

But Not of this world

“And I saw a new heaven and a new earth:

for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea.”
‭‭Revelation‬ ‭21:1‬ ‭KJV‬‬

Not of this world

“but the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.”
‭‭2 Peter‬ ‭3:7‬ ‭KJV‬‬

“But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.

(of this promised world )

Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness.”
‭‭2 Peter‬ ‭3:10, 13‬ ‭

agreed there’s no temple needed now and in eternity in the new world …… there isnt one
 
Feb 17, 2023
2,235
1,272
113
#89
I think if we just read longer sections for instance the op mentions this

“But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day: for then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be…..

but when Jesus is done telling them what’s about to happen in Jerusalem to them preparing them he eventually comes to this place

Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass, till all these things be fulfilled.”
‭‭Matthew‬ ‭24:20-21, 34‬ ‭KJV‬‬

that part tells us it was going to happen in that generation which 70 ad was about appx 30 yrs after Jesus told them and prepared them for the destruction of Jerusalem and it’s desolation.

“And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh. Then let them which are in Judæa flee to the mountains; and let them which are in the midst of it depart out; and let not them that are in the countries enter thereinto. For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled. ( it’s about the things in the ot being fulfilled the wrath upon jerusalem ) But woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck, in those days! for there shall be great distress in the land, and wrath upon this people. And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled.”
‭‭Luke‬ ‭21:20-24‬ ‭KJV‬‬

Nothing ever says it’s going to be rebuilt in the nt but after the time of the gentiles being allowed into the kingdom then Christ will return

The temples purpose was a holy place for Gods spirit to dwell in the center of and he could dwell
Among the people this way be among his chosen israelite people ….but that’s the Old Testament now he has a temple already

“Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.”
‭‭1 Corinthians‬ ‭3:16-17‬ ‭KJV‬‬

“in whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto an holy temple in the Lord: in whom ye also are builded together for an habitation of God through the Spirit.”
‭‭Ephesians‬ ‭2:21-22‬ ‭KJV‬‬

God doesn’t need a building now he has a church to dwell within and among that’s new there’s no purpose any longer for a temple …..it has no function anymore there’s no building on earth God will dwell within because he dwells in believers and they in him . There’s a place restored Jerusalem but no temple in it

“And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. ….And there came unto me one of the seven angels which had the seven vials full of the seven last plagues, and talked with me, saying, Come hither, I will shew thee the bride, the Lamb's wife. ( he describes the city )

….And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it.”
‭‭Revelation‬ ‭21:2, 9, 22‬ ‭KJV‬‬

There’s no more need for an imperfect levite priest to sacrifice animals blood upon an altar , and the veil was already torn to hide the inner most holy place .

No more need for the daily sacrifices ect if you break it down everything the temple was built for is already fulfilled in Christianity .



Jerusalem will eventually be revealed but for now it’s a heavenly place and will come from heaven to earth

I think the Jewish temple will be rebuilt - not because God wants it rebuilt - but that the antichrist does, even more than the Jews want it. He needs it to declare himself God. I know it's ridiculous and none of the Christians will accept him as he's already a big joke and a non-self aware loser, but the rest of world won't know that.

I think the antichrist (who isn't Muslim) will be so desperate to have it built that he won't care if the Muslims get mad at him to destroy the Dome of the Rock and whatever else is there to the third temple built.


🎻
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
10,180
4,448
113
mywebsite.us
#90
Some people believe an actual physical temple will descend from heaven and will be suspended in space and Jesus will rule from there.
I do not agree with this interpretation because Jesus stated..... but my kingdom is not of this world.
This is an idea that (in my experience) has always been associated with the New Jerusalem after the GWTJ (which is after the Millennium) rather than during the Millennium. I believe the idea of it being suspended up in the sky comes from this verse:

Revelation 21:

24 And the nations of them which are saved shall walk in the light of it: and the kings of the earth do bring their glory and honour into it.

- as if it were like a 'sun' of sorts, lighting the [whole] earth below.

Personally, I believe it will come down all the way to the earth.
 
Last edited:

Mem

Senior Member
Sep 23, 2014
7,660
2,344
113
#91
I think you missed the point. The issue is - would the Bible call something 'the temple of God' that God did not actually consider to be valid?

Or, are we to assume that the phrase is strictly being used from the perspective of the son of perdition?
That the phrase is used with the perspective of the son of perdition without regard of what it actually doesn't change the message that he, the son of perdition, assumes the validity of successfully accomplishing such a position as "'standing' where it ought not.' Before the torn veil, there was no one, other than the high priest, was permitted behind the veil and nor could anyone (else) "stand" if anyone dared to venture it (is the account for the requirement of the rope being tied to the priest's ankle written within scripture or is it only hearsay?). Wasn't Satan cast out of heaven for the very notion that he could 'ascend above the throne of God'?
 
Aug 22, 2024
255
20
18
#92
What we saw in the post to which you responded is the typical outflow from allegorizing scripture. Somehow, it's all ethereal, like a ghost.

THAT is how they make it say whatever they want within their story-telling antics to try and make the context say whatever they want it to say. Their "Bible Answer Man" clown does that every time he opens his mouth to talk about eschatology. That's the beauty in making scripture so very subjective; he attracts those who like making scripture say what HE and THEY want it to say.

As you saw, the tattered quilt woven together by ripping other passages from their contexts in order to draw the subjective and false lines of parallel to the third temple, all in an attempt to try and discredit what makes far greater sense when taken literally as a physical temple, wah-lah...they have their man-made story-interpretation that utterly defies what I know as an Israeli as the truth. Heck, those people are also a large portion of the sourcing from which we hear some of the outlandish garbage of replacement theology. That poster was right in one sense....what use do Gentiles have for a temple if they were replaced by the Gentile Church? That gang is well aware of Israel's fall, as stated by Paul, and Preterism is all but too happy to force Gentiles into the place of Israel in all God's plans for the future. Satan really likes all that given that he's been trying to wipe us Israelis off the face of the earth since Abraham.

What the ethereal/allegory gang fails to take into consideration as a gauge to their misrepresentations of scripture is the 70 weeks of Jacob's trouble, the last seven years of which are those years within which the third temple will exist. Looking back, we can see that the LITERAL decree to rebuild was for a literal, physical walls and temple 434 years prior to the crucifixion of Messiah, which was also literal, with Messiah being literal. All throughout, those walls were literally physical walls, and that temple was a literal, physical temple that was rebuilt. It took them 49 years to accomplish that with their ancient tools and back-breaking labor. The Jewish Messiah then entered the city on a colt the very day of that decree 434 years after that work was accomplished...to the day!

Ahhh, but for the future, it's much easier for the blind to convince the blind who are all too happy to go along with reshaping the narrative into a hyper-spiritualized mess that creates more problems than it solves. After all, EVERYBODY likes to think of themselves as being so very spiritual, and so applying interpretational methods that fail to conform to the history and constraints of biblical language and meaning as understood through accepted hermeneutical methodology, proven time after time as a reliable system, the new religions rear their ugly heads, a large percentage of the population of which also think that we today must be baptized unto the remission of sins, which is works-based salvation that simply doesn't mix with salvation by grace through faith. They boast in their baptisms and their works of restraint to keep from allegedly losing salvation.

Falsehood has many, many faces. The effectiveness behind falsehoods is the prime reason Satan doesn't possess people today. Falsehoods are a far more effective weapon, especially when he can get people to downplay the absolute merits of the Blood of Christ by mixing it with their own efforts, their own works. Such as Christ is completely unknown to the scriptures. Those are all false christs, of which scripture effectively warns against when taken literally...

The main purpose for the third temple isn't so much that it will be God's dwelling place, but the place where the man of sin will declare himself god. It will be the trigger for the greatest of all the wrath God will already have been pouring out upon the earth.

MM
From what I have seen most amils are replacement theology.
The new replacement breed of warriors denies The term "replacement". They don't like it.
But it perfectly defines them.

Amil is an animal all it's own, and robs them in other areas of God's word.
Amil is confusion.
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
8,248
3,228
113
#93
From what I have seen most amils are replacement theology.
The new replacement breed of warriors denies The term "replacement". They don't like it.
But it perfectly defines them.

Amil is an animal all it's own, and robs them in other areas of God's word.
Amil is confusion.
People who accuse of "replacement" do not understand the covenant God made with Abraham.
 

Pilgrimshope

Well-known member
Sep 2, 2020
15,286
6,220
113
#94
I think the Jewish temple will be rebuilt - not because God wants it rebuilt - but that the antichrist does, even more than the Jews want it. He needs it to declare himself God. I know it's ridiculous and none of the Christians will accept him as he's already a big joke and a non-self aware loser, but the rest of world won't know that.

I think the antichrist (who isn't Muslim) will be so desperate to have it built that he won't care if the Muslims get mad at him to destroy the Dome of the Rock and whatever else is there to the third temple built.


🎻
yeah brother could be I’m just speaking from my perspective and opinion from things I’ve read and considered, certainly not here to tell you you’re wrong or anything.

But if you examine the nt prophecy and scripture at what point do we see it rebuilt ? That would be all I would need to convert my thinking but I’ve never seen it in the doctrine

I understand your saying because of this then the temple needs to be rebuilt

“Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.”
‭‭2 Thessalonians‬ ‭2:3-4‬ ‭KJV‬‬

i just don’t see this as a rebuilding of a jewish temple in the end times before the lord returns. But it’s just what I think doesn’t mean you are wrong
 
Feb 17, 2023
2,235
1,272
113
#95
yeah brother could be I’m just speaking from my perspective and opinion from things I’ve read and considered, certainly not here to tell you you’re wrong or anything.

But if you examine the nt prophecy and scripture at what point do we see it rebuilt ? That would be all I would need to convert my thinking but I’ve never seen it in the doctrine

I understand your saying because of this then the temple needs to be rebuilt

“Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.”
‭‭2 Thessalonians‬ ‭2:3-4‬ ‭KJV‬‬

i just don’t see this as a rebuilding of a jewish temple in the end times before the lord returns. But it’s just what I think doesn’t mean you are wrong

I think it is significant that God doesn't even treat the building of the third temple like it is a prophecy - because it really isn't. It's not something He is backing with His approval and support. He's just acknowledging that the antichrist (and the poor unknowing Jews) really wants it built.

I looked up how long would it take to build it, and since the Jews have all the materials and building parts completed, they can complete it within supposedly 7 years. BUT the Jews can start daily animal sacrifices even earlier without waiting for it to be completed.

This may be a time to signal to Christians to start getting ready for the great tribulation, building up your endurance first and foremost and then doing everything God tells you to get ready to endure to the end or till He takes you home before that.


🎻
 

HeIsHere

Well-known member
May 21, 2022
8,248
3,228
113
#96
The curtain tearing was surely a prophetic sign; but it didn't make the temple not-the-temple; the disciples still continued to call it "the temple", and the authors of the scripture contine to refer to it as "the temple".
Until it was destroyed, there was a period of transition which God allowed.
 
Nov 25, 2024
446
218
43
#97
The "complete fulfillment" of what exactly-and-precisely? How does the destruction of Jerusalem become the "complete fulfillment" of all End Times Scenario prophecy? Otherwise, what is left to be fulfilled?

If Jesus returned circa 70 A.D. - how do you "explain away" all of the things the Bible indicates will occur at/after His Second Coming before his reign begins? (please understand the context)
I haven't committed to the following idea - just asking about it to see if it could fit. I know you are aware of the lies told to make people believe Earth is a ball - what if similar lies were told to try to deny the millennial kingdom of Christ?

If the first resurrection has already occurred - that only leaves the second resurrection before the GWTJ. How do the "tribulation saints" that do not worship the beast or accept the mark of the beast - and, reign with Christ - fit into this? Are they in their 'glorified body' right now "reigning with Christ" on the earth?
I think the answer to this question is the same, whether we are talking the below passage with the millennial kingdom in the past, or to come - it doesn't make sense to me. How can Satan do this with Jesus reigning on Earth? Is the passage explicit that Jesus is on Earth when this happens? How can people in their right minds be deceived by Satan when Jesus has been reigning on Earth for 1000 years? I don't know.

Revelation 20:7 And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison,
8 And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog, and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea.
9 And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them.

What happens to this

Had the beast system and the mark of the beast already been brought into existence and enforced before/by circa 70 A.D.?

Armageddon? When did that happen? What about the great valley?

Where are the 144,000?

The Two Witnesses? The Trumpets? The Vials? Stars fall from heaven? Everything moved out of its place? When did these things happen?
I think the answers to all of these would be yes (given the initial assumption), and prior to the kingdom coming. There is strange, poorly explained archeological evidence - what appears to be melted cities (i.e. as if destroyed by extreme heat/fire). Some of the accounts of the black death are that it was more of a supernatural event than a natural plague - I don't believe the current explanation does justice to the alleged fatality rate from it. Some estimates are that a third of the people were killed by it, that it was spread by supernatural entities (i.e. similar to a judgement described in Revelation).

Bible prophecy puts all of these things - and more - at the time of the Second Coming of Christ - before the 1000-year reign gets started.
Yes, there would have to be deception involved, but you would also admit that Satan has been pretty good at that with what you're aware of.
 

Pilgrimshope

Well-known member
Sep 2, 2020
15,286
6,220
113
#98
I think it is significant that God doesn't even treat the building of the third temple like it is a prophecy - because it really isn't. It's not something He is backing with His approval and support. He's just acknowledging that the antichrist (and the poor unknowing Jews) really wants it built.

I looked up how long would it take to build it, and since the Jews have all the materials and building parts completed, they can complete it within supposedly 7 years. BUT the Jews can start daily animal sacrifices even earlier without waiting for it to be completed.

This may be a time to signal to Christians to start getting ready for the great tribulation, building up your endurance first and foremost and then doing everything God tells you to get ready to endure to the end or till He takes you home before that.


🎻
“He's just acknowledging that the antichrist (and the poor unknowing Jews) really wants it built.”

where is he acknowledging this ?

Do you know that the temple mound now is and has been under Islamic control for hundreds of years and on tbe temple mound itself there sits the Islamic mosque that states in its ceiling “ God has no son “ ?

a religion tbat exalts this false alla as the most high God ? Claiming he is God ? Denying Christs divinity and name as the son of God ? Denying his death and resurrection ect

The bible is pretty thorough really usually repeating things again and again in various ways. It tells really detailed about the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem repetetively but after the temple is made desolate nothing in the nt ever says it will be rebuilt ( as far as I know I mean )

But again to be clear these are just my thoughts regarding it , it doesn’t mean I’m right and you are wrong. I think even if it was the antichrist who would have the temple rebuilt it would be a featured subject in the nt especially because it would really then hold importance in doctrine

my opinion is that the temple the son of perdition sits as god in ….. is a false church worshipping a false messiah
 

2ndTimeIsTheCharm

Well-known member
Feb 17, 2023
2,235
1,272
113
#99
“He's just acknowledging that the antichrist (and the poor unknowing Jews) really wants it built.”

where is he acknowledging this ?

I say God acknowledges it because He allows it to be mentioned in the Bible, that's all.


Do you know that the temple mound now is and has been under Islamic control for hundreds of years and on tbe temple mound itself there sits the Islamic mosque that states in its ceiling “ God has no son “ ?

a religion tbat exalts this false alla as the most high God ? Claiming he is God ? Denying Christs divinity and name as the son of God ? Denying his death and resurrection ect

Yeah, it's going to be interesting how the antichrist will get rid of the Dome of the Rock and other Muslim structures there. He will probably play dirty so the Muslims won't even be able to stop him from destroying it to get the third temple built.


The bible is pretty thorough really usually repeating things again and again in various ways. It tells really detailed about the destruction of the temple in Jerusalem repetetively but after the temple is made desolate nothing in the nt ever says it will be rebuilt ( as far as I know I mean )

But again to be clear these are just my thoughts regarding it , it doesn’t mean I’m right and you are wrong. I think even if it was the antichrist who would have the temple rebuilt it would be a featured subject in the nt especially because it would really then hold importance in doctrine

my opinion is that the temple the son of perdition sits as god in ….. is a false church worshipping a false messiah

I think God makes it insignificant because it's not really that important to Him. The Jews and the antichrist are clinging to some past false glory that means nothing to Him. I mean think about it - the antichrist is only going to be in power for 3-1/2 years - 7 years if you count the 3-1/2 year priors to him abolishing the daily sacrifices and desecrating the temple. That's not very long - even Hitler reigned longer - 12 years! Plus the antichrist and false prophet get defeated in the most humiliating way - worse than what Hitler went through. I mean Jesus as the warrior king won't even have to fully level up His Super Saiyan powers!


🎻
 

Jimbone

Senior Member
Aug 22, 2014
3,270
1,145
113
45
I think the Jewish temple will be rebuilt - not because God wants it rebuilt - but that the antichrist does, even more than the Jews want it. He needs it to declare himself God. I know it's ridiculous and none of the Christians will accept him as he's already a big joke and a non-self aware loser, but the rest of world won't know that.

I think the antichrist (who isn't Muslim) will be so desperate to have it built that he won't care if the Muslims get mad at him to destroy the Dome of the Rock and whatever else is there to the third temple built.


🎻
Yeah, I agree this is the only thing that even could happen now, but it still wouldn't be what scripture describes, the AC desecrates the "Holy Place", and that can't be some fake false temple men decided to rebuild. You can't desolate a fraud, it's a desecration in itself. This doesn't even consider the fact that the whole sacrificial Temple system had one purpose, to point to Jesus. Another Temple would be a slap to the face of the King who has already fulfilled salvation and reconciling mans spirit back to His. A 3rd temple makes no sense on any level.