Precious friend,
@LeeLoving, there is Much
Confusion about water baptism, which is
Not for us,
Today,
Under Grace, As God Only Has ONE [ Spiritual ] Baptism In This Dispensation Of Grace!
Amen.
I have to respectfully disagree.
If your statement is factual, why did the Spirit give the order to Philip to join the Ethiopian's chariot, for the purpose of preaching the good news of Jesus, and carrying out water baptism?
Acts 8:29
And the Spirit said to Philip, “Go over and join this chariot.”
Acts 8:30
So Philip ran to him and heard him reading Isaiah the prophet and asked, “Do you understand what you are reading?”
Acts 8:35
Then Philip opened his mouth, and beginning with this Scripture he told him the good news about Jesus.
Acts 8:36
And as they were going along the road they came to some water, and the eunuch said, “See, here is water! What prevents me from being baptized?”
Acts 8:38
And he commanded the chariot to stop, and they both went down into the water, Philip and the eunuch, and he baptized him.
Acts 8:39
And when they came up out of the water, the Spirit of the Lord carried Philip away, and the eunuch saw him no more, and went on his way rejoicing.
If water baptism is no longer for us, why didn't the Spirit, through Philip, tell the Ethiopian that water baptism was now obsolete?
Also, when Peter visited Cornelius, the Holy Spirit fell on all those who heard the word, causing Peter to declare:
Acts 10:47-48
“
Can anyone withhold water for baptizing these people, who have received the Holy Spirit just as we have?” And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ.
Surely that's two biblical examples of water baptism still being relevant?
In the case of the Ethiopian eunuch, belief in Jesus, preceding water baptism. And concerning the gentiles, the gift of the Holy Spirit poured out on them, preceding water baptism.
The baptism of John has been superseded by baptism in the name of Jesus, but immersion in water is still applicable.